1307 名新生儿胸部和腹部 X 射线照相术的辐射量和辐射诱发癌症的估计风险。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10942-x
Deliah Weiß, Martin Beeres, Ulrich Rochwalsky, Thomas J Vogl, Rolf Schlößer
{"title":"1307 名新生儿胸部和腹部 X 射线照相术的辐射量和辐射诱发癌症的估计风险。","authors":"Deliah Weiß, Martin Beeres, Ulrich Rochwalsky, Thomas J Vogl, Rolf Schlößer","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10942-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined radiation exposure and the possible risk of radiation-induced cancer in a large sample of newborn and premature patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we included all hospitalised neonates treated at our university hospital who received at least one X-ray examination from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated the dose area product (DAP), effective dose (ED), and estimated risk. The International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 defines values (2.8-13 × 10<sup>-2 </sup>Sv<sup>-1</sup>) to calculate the estimated risk in relation to the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3843 patients (aged 241.1 ± 35.45 days) treated in the neonatal care unit, 1307 (34%) received at least one X-ray. The mean number of X-ray examinations per patient was 3.19 and correlated negatively with birth weight. The mean cumulative DAP was 5.9 mGy*cm<sup>2</sup>, and the cumulative ED was 23.7 µSv per hospital stay. Patients with a birth weight of < 1000 g showed the highest cumulative ED and DAP (p < 0.001). Patients with a birth weight of < 2500 g had the highest ED and DAP per image (p < 0.001). The highest radiation exposure (ED/DAP) occurred for thoracic/abdominal examinations, especially for neonates < 500 g (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a strong correlation between immaturity, the number of X-ray examinations, and radiation exposure. The total exposure was minimal, and the number of X-rays per patient has been decreasing in recent years.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Possible risks to newborns and premature infants caused by ionising X-rays are often the subject of scientific and clinical discussion. Nevertheless, conventional X-ray imaging remains a frequently used tool, and total exposure remains at a very low level.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The number of X-rays per patient has been decreasing in a large university hospital. Half of all patients received only one X-ray; most had a birth weight over 1500 g. This radiation risk can be classified as 'minimal' for patients with a birth weight of < 500 g and as 'negligible' for others.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"297-308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation exposure and estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer from thoracic and abdominal radiographs in 1307 neonates.\",\"authors\":\"Deliah Weiß, Martin Beeres, Ulrich Rochwalsky, Thomas J Vogl, Rolf Schlößer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-10942-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined radiation exposure and the possible risk of radiation-induced cancer in a large sample of newborn and premature patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we included all hospitalised neonates treated at our university hospital who received at least one X-ray examination from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated the dose area product (DAP), effective dose (ED), and estimated risk. The International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 defines values (2.8-13 × 10<sup>-2 </sup>Sv<sup>-1</sup>) to calculate the estimated risk in relation to the ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3843 patients (aged 241.1 ± 35.45 days) treated in the neonatal care unit, 1307 (34%) received at least one X-ray. The mean number of X-ray examinations per patient was 3.19 and correlated negatively with birth weight. The mean cumulative DAP was 5.9 mGy*cm<sup>2</sup>, and the cumulative ED was 23.7 µSv per hospital stay. Patients with a birth weight of < 1000 g showed the highest cumulative ED and DAP (p < 0.001). Patients with a birth weight of < 2500 g had the highest ED and DAP per image (p < 0.001). The highest radiation exposure (ED/DAP) occurred for thoracic/abdominal examinations, especially for neonates < 500 g (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a strong correlation between immaturity, the number of X-ray examinations, and radiation exposure. The total exposure was minimal, and the number of X-rays per patient has been decreasing in recent years.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Possible risks to newborns and premature infants caused by ionising X-rays are often the subject of scientific and clinical discussion. Nevertheless, conventional X-ray imaging remains a frequently used tool, and total exposure remains at a very low level.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The number of X-rays per patient has been decreasing in a large university hospital. Half of all patients received only one X-ray; most had a birth weight over 1500 g. This radiation risk can be classified as 'minimal' for patients with a birth weight of < 500 g and as 'negligible' for others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"297-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10942-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10942-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究调查了大样本新生儿和早产儿患者的辐射暴露和辐射诱发癌症的可能风险:在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在我校医院接受过至少一次 X 光检查的所有住院新生儿。我们评估了剂量面积乘积(DAP)、有效剂量(ED)和估计风险。根据国际放射防护委员会第 60 号出版物的定义值(2.8-13 × 10-2 Sv-1)来计算与 ED 有关的估计风险:在新生儿监护室接受治疗的 3843 名患者(年龄为 241.1 ± 35.45 天)中,1307 人(34%)至少接受了一次 X 光检查。每位患者接受 X 光检查的平均次数为 3.19 次,与出生体重呈负相关。平均累积 DAP 为 5.9 mGy*cm2,每次住院的累积 ED 为 23.7 µSv。出生时体重为 0.5 μSv 的患者不成熟、X 射线检查次数和辐照量之间存在密切联系。总辐射量很小,近年来每位患者的 X 射线检查次数也在减少:电离 X 射线对新生儿和早产儿可能造成的风险经常成为科学和临床讨论的主题。尽管如此,传统的 X 射线成像仍是一种常用工具,而且总照射量仍处于非常低的水平:一家大型大学医院的每位患者接受 X 射线的次数一直在减少。半数患者只接受过一次 X 光检查;大多数患者的出生体重超过 1500 克。对于出生体重在 1500 克以下的患者,这种辐射风险可归类为 "最小"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Radiation exposure and estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer from thoracic and abdominal radiographs in 1307 neonates.

Radiation exposure and estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer from thoracic and abdominal radiographs in 1307 neonates.

Objective: This study examined radiation exposure and the possible risk of radiation-induced cancer in a large sample of newborn and premature patients.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, we included all hospitalised neonates treated at our university hospital who received at least one X-ray examination from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018. We evaluated the dose area product (DAP), effective dose (ED), and estimated risk. The International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 defines values (2.8-13 × 10-2 Sv-1) to calculate the estimated risk in relation to the ED.

Results: Of the 3843 patients (aged 241.1 ± 35.45 days) treated in the neonatal care unit, 1307 (34%) received at least one X-ray. The mean number of X-ray examinations per patient was 3.19 and correlated negatively with birth weight. The mean cumulative DAP was 5.9 mGy*cm2, and the cumulative ED was 23.7 µSv per hospital stay. Patients with a birth weight of < 1000 g showed the highest cumulative ED and DAP (p < 0.001). Patients with a birth weight of < 2500 g had the highest ED and DAP per image (p < 0.001). The highest radiation exposure (ED/DAP) occurred for thoracic/abdominal examinations, especially for neonates < 500 g (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between immaturity, the number of X-ray examinations, and radiation exposure. The total exposure was minimal, and the number of X-rays per patient has been decreasing in recent years.

Clinical relevance: Possible risks to newborns and premature infants caused by ionising X-rays are often the subject of scientific and clinical discussion. Nevertheless, conventional X-ray imaging remains a frequently used tool, and total exposure remains at a very low level.

Key points: The number of X-rays per patient has been decreasing in a large university hospital. Half of all patients received only one X-ray; most had a birth weight over 1500 g. This radiation risk can be classified as 'minimal' for patients with a birth weight of < 500 g and as 'negligible' for others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信