AcornHRD:与中国乳腺癌蒽环类新辅助化疗高度相关的HRD算法。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Jia-Ni Pan, Pu-Chun Li, Meng Wang, Ming-Wei Li, Xiao-Wen Ding, Tao Zhou, Hui-Na Wang, Yun-Kai Wang, Li-Bin Chen, Rong Wang, Wei-Wu Ye, Wei-Zhu Wu, Feng Lou, Xiao-Jia Wang, Wen-Ming Cao
{"title":"AcornHRD:与中国乳腺癌蒽环类新辅助化疗高度相关的HRD算法。","authors":"Jia-Ni Pan, Pu-Chun Li, Meng Wang, Ming-Wei Li, Xiao-Wen Ding, Tao Zhou, Hui-Na Wang, Yun-Kai Wang, Li-Bin Chen, Rong Wang, Wei-Wu Ye, Wei-Zhu Wu, Feng Lou, Xiao-Jia Wang, Wen-Ming Cao","doi":"10.1186/s40001-024-01936-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to develop and validate a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scoring algorithm in the Chinese breast cancer population.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Ninety-six in-house breast cancer (BC) samples and 6 HRD-positive standard cells were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Besides, 122 BCs from the TCGA database were down-sampled to ~ 1X WGS. We constructed an algorithm named AcornHRD for HRD score calculated based on WGS at low coverage as input data to estimate large-scale copy number alteration (LCNA) events on the genome. A clinical cohort of 50 BCs (15 cases carrying BRCA mutation) was used to assess the association between HRD status and anthracyclines-based neoadjuvant treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 100-kb window was defined as the optimal size using 41 in-house cases and the TCGA dataset. HRD score high threshold was determined as HRD score ≥ 10 using 55 in-house BCs with BRCA mutation to achieve a 95% BRCA-positive agreement rate. Furthermore, the HRD status agreement rate of AcornHRD is 100%, while the ShallowHRD is 60% in standard cells. BRCA mutation was significantly associated with a high HRD score evaluated by AcornHRD and ShallowHRD (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003, respectively) in the TCGA dataset. However, AcornHRD showed a higher positive agreement rate than did the ShallowHRD algorithm (70% vs 60%). In addition, the BRCA-positive agreement rate of AcornHRD was superior to that of ShallowHRD (87% vs 13%) in the clinical cohort. Importantly, the high HRD score assessed by AcornHRD was significantly correlated with a residual cancer burden score of 0 or 1 (RCB0/1). Besides, the HRD-positive group was more likely to respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy than the HRD-negative group (pCR [OR = 9.5, 95% CI 1.11-81.5, p = 0.040] and RCB0/1 [OR = 10.29, 95% CI 2.02-52.36, p = 0.005]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the AcornHRD algorithm evaluation, our analysis demonstrated the high performance of the LCNA genomic signature for HRD detection in breast cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AcornHRD: an HRD algorithm highly associated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer in China.\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Ni Pan, Pu-Chun Li, Meng Wang, Ming-Wei Li, Xiao-Wen Ding, Tao Zhou, Hui-Na Wang, Yun-Kai Wang, Li-Bin Chen, Rong Wang, Wei-Wu Ye, Wei-Zhu Wu, Feng Lou, Xiao-Jia Wang, Wen-Ming Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-024-01936-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to develop and validate a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scoring algorithm in the Chinese breast cancer population.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Ninety-six in-house breast cancer (BC) samples and 6 HRD-positive standard cells were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Besides, 122 BCs from the TCGA database were down-sampled to ~ 1X WGS. We constructed an algorithm named AcornHRD for HRD score calculated based on WGS at low coverage as input data to estimate large-scale copy number alteration (LCNA) events on the genome. A clinical cohort of 50 BCs (15 cases carrying BRCA mutation) was used to assess the association between HRD status and anthracyclines-based neoadjuvant treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 100-kb window was defined as the optimal size using 41 in-house cases and the TCGA dataset. HRD score high threshold was determined as HRD score ≥ 10 using 55 in-house BCs with BRCA mutation to achieve a 95% BRCA-positive agreement rate. Furthermore, the HRD status agreement rate of AcornHRD is 100%, while the ShallowHRD is 60% in standard cells. BRCA mutation was significantly associated with a high HRD score evaluated by AcornHRD and ShallowHRD (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003, respectively) in the TCGA dataset. However, AcornHRD showed a higher positive agreement rate than did the ShallowHRD algorithm (70% vs 60%). In addition, the BRCA-positive agreement rate of AcornHRD was superior to that of ShallowHRD (87% vs 13%) in the clinical cohort. Importantly, the high HRD score assessed by AcornHRD was significantly correlated with a residual cancer burden score of 0 or 1 (RCB0/1). Besides, the HRD-positive group was more likely to respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy than the HRD-negative group (pCR [OR = 9.5, 95% CI 1.11-81.5, p = 0.040] and RCB0/1 [OR = 10.29, 95% CI 2.02-52.36, p = 0.005]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the AcornHRD algorithm evaluation, our analysis demonstrated the high performance of the LCNA genomic signature for HRD detection in breast cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253386/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01936-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01936-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的研究旨在开发并验证中国乳腺癌人群同源重组缺陷(HRD)评分算法:通过全基因组测序(WGS)分析了96个内部乳腺癌(BC)样本和6个HRD阳性标准细胞。此外,我们还对 TCGA 数据库中的 122 个乳腺癌样本进行了约 1 倍 WGS 的下采样。我们构建了一种名为 AcornHRD 的算法,根据低覆盖率 WGS 计算的 HRD 分数作为输入数据,估算基因组上的大规模拷贝数改变(LCNA)事件。研究人员利用50例BC(15例携带BRCA突变)的临床队列来评估HRD状态与基于蒽环类药物的新辅助治疗结果之间的关联:利用41个内部病例和TCGA数据集,将100kb窗口定义为最佳大小。使用 55 例 BRCA 突变的内部 BC 确定 HRD 评分高阈值为 HRD 评分≥ 10,以达到 95% 的 BRCA 阳性一致率。此外,在标准细胞中,AcornHRD 的 HRD 状态一致率为 100%,而 ShallowHRD 为 60%。在 TCGA 数据集中,AcornHRD 和 ShallowHRD 评估的 BRCA 突变与 HRD 高分显著相关(分别为 p = 0.008 和 p = 0.003)。不过,AcornHRD 的阳性一致率高于 ShallowHRD 算法(70% 对 60%)。此外,在临床队列中,AcornHRD 的 BRCA 阳性一致率优于 ShallowHRD(87% vs 13%)。重要的是,AcornHRD 评估的高 HRD 得分与残余癌症负担得分 0 或 1(RCB0/1)显著相关。此外,HRD阳性组比HRD阴性组更有可能对蒽环类化疗产生反应(pCR [OR = 9.5, 95% CI 1.11-81.5, p = 0.040] 和 RCB0/1 [OR = 10.29, 95% CI 2.02-52.36, p = 0.005]):通过对 AcornHRD 算法的评估,我们的分析证明了 LCNA 基因组特征在乳腺癌 HRD 检测中的高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AcornHRD: an HRD algorithm highly associated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer in China.

Purpose: Our study aimed to develop and validate a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scoring algorithm in the Chinese breast cancer population.

Methods and materials: Ninety-six in-house breast cancer (BC) samples and 6 HRD-positive standard cells were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Besides, 122 BCs from the TCGA database were down-sampled to ~ 1X WGS. We constructed an algorithm named AcornHRD for HRD score calculated based on WGS at low coverage as input data to estimate large-scale copy number alteration (LCNA) events on the genome. A clinical cohort of 50 BCs (15 cases carrying BRCA mutation) was used to assess the association between HRD status and anthracyclines-based neoadjuvant treatment outcomes.

Results: A 100-kb window was defined as the optimal size using 41 in-house cases and the TCGA dataset. HRD score high threshold was determined as HRD score ≥ 10 using 55 in-house BCs with BRCA mutation to achieve a 95% BRCA-positive agreement rate. Furthermore, the HRD status agreement rate of AcornHRD is 100%, while the ShallowHRD is 60% in standard cells. BRCA mutation was significantly associated with a high HRD score evaluated by AcornHRD and ShallowHRD (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003, respectively) in the TCGA dataset. However, AcornHRD showed a higher positive agreement rate than did the ShallowHRD algorithm (70% vs 60%). In addition, the BRCA-positive agreement rate of AcornHRD was superior to that of ShallowHRD (87% vs 13%) in the clinical cohort. Importantly, the high HRD score assessed by AcornHRD was significantly correlated with a residual cancer burden score of 0 or 1 (RCB0/1). Besides, the HRD-positive group was more likely to respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy than the HRD-negative group (pCR [OR = 9.5, 95% CI 1.11-81.5, p = 0.040] and RCB0/1 [OR = 10.29, 95% CI 2.02-52.36, p = 0.005]).

Conclusion: Using the AcornHRD algorithm evaluation, our analysis demonstrated the high performance of the LCNA genomic signature for HRD detection in breast cancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信