{"title":"印度哈里亚纳邦外围公共医疗保健中心使用数据进行循证计划决策的决定因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health policies and programs in India are put into practice at the local level, where the frontline managers -Medical Officers in Charges (MOICs) use data for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) and implementing these programs. However, there are various organizational, technical, and individual determinants that can impact data use. The study aims to recognize the determinants of data-driven decision-making at the grassroots level.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The cross-sectional study collected primary empirical data from 120 MOICs from six identified districts in Haryana, India<strong>.</strong> Data utilization was the variable of interest and was measured through Data Utilization Score (DUS). Determinants affecting DUS were extracted through Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of data utilization from the extracted factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MOICs used routine data to plan, implement, manage, and monitor health programs, and administrative activities. Actual skill for data usage (65 %) was less than the anticipated skill (82 %). Twenty-seven reliable organizational, technical, and individual factors were generated from the 154 variables explaining 57.7 %–68 % of the total variance. Regression analysis showed that management meetings with superiors/subordinates, data-conducive and promotive culture, perceived data quality, incentivization, basic software knowledge/skills, and training needs were among the most significant predictors of data usage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although a disparity exists between the expected and actual data utilization skills of MOICs, still data-based decisions can be enhanced by effective management meetings, fostering a robust data culture, prioritizing skill development, and incentivizing data use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002094/pdfft?md5=50fc42d7ae8bd976d522a2671271f71f&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002094-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of data use for programmatic evidence-based decision making at peripheral public health care centres in Haryana, India\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health policies and programs in India are put into practice at the local level, where the frontline managers -Medical Officers in Charges (MOICs) use data for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) and implementing these programs. However, there are various organizational, technical, and individual determinants that can impact data use. The study aims to recognize the determinants of data-driven decision-making at the grassroots level.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The cross-sectional study collected primary empirical data from 120 MOICs from six identified districts in Haryana, India<strong>.</strong> Data utilization was the variable of interest and was measured through Data Utilization Score (DUS). Determinants affecting DUS were extracted through Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of data utilization from the extracted factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MOICs used routine data to plan, implement, manage, and monitor health programs, and administrative activities. Actual skill for data usage (65 %) was less than the anticipated skill (82 %). Twenty-seven reliable organizational, technical, and individual factors were generated from the 154 variables explaining 57.7 %–68 % of the total variance. Regression analysis showed that management meetings with superiors/subordinates, data-conducive and promotive culture, perceived data quality, incentivization, basic software knowledge/skills, and training needs were among the most significant predictors of data usage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although a disparity exists between the expected and actual data utilization skills of MOICs, still data-based decisions can be enhanced by effective management meetings, fostering a robust data culture, prioritizing skill development, and incentivizing data use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002094/pdfft?md5=50fc42d7ae8bd976d522a2671271f71f&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002094-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determinants of data use for programmatic evidence-based decision making at peripheral public health care centres in Haryana, India
Background
Health policies and programs in India are put into practice at the local level, where the frontline managers -Medical Officers in Charges (MOICs) use data for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) and implementing these programs. However, there are various organizational, technical, and individual determinants that can impact data use. The study aims to recognize the determinants of data-driven decision-making at the grassroots level.
Methods
The cross-sectional study collected primary empirical data from 120 MOICs from six identified districts in Haryana, India. Data utilization was the variable of interest and was measured through Data Utilization Score (DUS). Determinants affecting DUS were extracted through Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of data utilization from the extracted factors.
Results
MOICs used routine data to plan, implement, manage, and monitor health programs, and administrative activities. Actual skill for data usage (65 %) was less than the anticipated skill (82 %). Twenty-seven reliable organizational, technical, and individual factors were generated from the 154 variables explaining 57.7 %–68 % of the total variance. Regression analysis showed that management meetings with superiors/subordinates, data-conducive and promotive culture, perceived data quality, incentivization, basic software knowledge/skills, and training needs were among the most significant predictors of data usage.
Conclusion
Although a disparity exists between the expected and actual data utilization skills of MOICs, still data-based decisions can be enhanced by effective management meetings, fostering a robust data culture, prioritizing skill development, and incentivizing data use.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.