股骨骨折手术围手术期静脉输注铁剂的结果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Wen Xian Low , Hetta Friend , Joseph Dulleston , Sophie Heppenstall , Kate Spacey , Ignatius Liew
{"title":"股骨骨折手术围手术期静脉输注铁剂的结果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wen Xian Low ,&nbsp;Hetta Friend ,&nbsp;Joseph Dulleston ,&nbsp;Sophie Heppenstall ,&nbsp;Kate Spacey ,&nbsp;Ignatius Liew","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Patient blood management recommends the use of intravenous (IV) iron infusion to reduce inappropriate blood transfusion perioperatively for anaemic surgical patients. However, evidence regarding its use in urgent </span>femoral fracture surgery is limited. This </span>systematic review<span> aims to collate the current evidence regarding the utilisation of IV iron in femoral fracture surgery.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP databases were systematically searched for </span>randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing the outcomes of perioperative IV iron infusion with placebo in adults requiring surgical management for femoral fractures. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) were calculated with the inverse-variance method for continuous outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Six RCTs with 1292 patients were included. No statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.75; 1.01, p = 0.058) between groups. Statistically significant difference in postoperative haemoglobin concentration was found between groups measured between day 4–7 of admission (MD = 1.93 g/L, 95%CI: 0.48; 3.39, p = 0.024), but not clinically significant. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in </span>mortality rate, length of hospital stay, infection rate, or return to home rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><span>Current evidence indicates that IV iron infusion alone does not provide any clinically significant benefit in femoral fracture surgery. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to explore its synergistic potential when used in combination with other perioperative optimisation methods, including tranexamic acid, </span>erythropoietin and cell salvage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages e171-e180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of perioperative intravenous iron infusion in femoral fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Wen Xian Low ,&nbsp;Hetta Friend ,&nbsp;Joseph Dulleston ,&nbsp;Sophie Heppenstall ,&nbsp;Kate Spacey ,&nbsp;Ignatius Liew\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Patient blood management recommends the use of intravenous (IV) iron infusion to reduce inappropriate blood transfusion perioperatively for anaemic surgical patients. However, evidence regarding its use in urgent </span>femoral fracture surgery is limited. This </span>systematic review<span> aims to collate the current evidence regarding the utilisation of IV iron in femoral fracture surgery.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP databases were systematically searched for </span>randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing the outcomes of perioperative IV iron infusion with placebo in adults requiring surgical management for femoral fractures. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) were calculated with the inverse-variance method for continuous outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Six RCTs with 1292 patients were included. No statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.75; 1.01, p = 0.058) between groups. Statistically significant difference in postoperative haemoglobin concentration was found between groups measured between day 4–7 of admission (MD = 1.93 g/L, 95%CI: 0.48; 3.39, p = 0.024), but not clinically significant. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in </span>mortality rate, length of hospital stay, infection rate, or return to home rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><span>Current evidence indicates that IV iron infusion alone does not provide any clinically significant benefit in femoral fracture surgery. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to explore its synergistic potential when used in combination with other perioperative optimisation methods, including tranexamic acid, </span>erythropoietin and cell salvage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages e171-e180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者血液管理建议使用静脉输注铁剂,以减少贫血手术患者围手术期的不当输血。然而,在股骨骨折紧急手术中使用静脉输注的证据却很有限。本系统性综述旨在整理有关股骨骨折手术中静脉输注铁剂的现有证据:方法:系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、Clinicaltrials.gov 和 WHO ICTRP 数据库中的随机对照试验 (RCT),比较了股骨骨折需要手术治疗的成人围手术期静脉输注铁剂与安慰剂的疗效。对二分结果采用曼特尔-海恩泽尔法计算风险比(RR),对连续结果采用逆方差法计算平均差(MD):结果:共纳入六项研究,1292 名患者。各组间接受红细胞(RBC)输注的患者比例差异无统计学意义(RR=0.87,95%CI:0.75;1.01,P=0.058)。入院第 4-7 天测量的术后血红蛋白浓度在组间存在显著统计学差异(MD = 1.93 g/L,95%CI:0.48;3.39,p = 0.024),但无临床意义。在死亡率、住院时间、感染率或回家率方面,各组之间没有发现明显的统计学差异:结论:目前的证据表明,单纯静脉输注铁剂对股骨骨折手术并无任何临床意义。需要进一步开展高质量的研究性试验,以探索其与其他围手术期优化方法(包括氨甲环酸、促红细胞生成素和细胞抢救)联合使用时的协同潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of perioperative intravenous iron infusion in femoral fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

Patient blood management recommends the use of intravenous (IV) iron infusion to reduce inappropriate blood transfusion perioperatively for anaemic surgical patients. However, evidence regarding its use in urgent femoral fracture surgery is limited. This systematic review aims to collate the current evidence regarding the utilisation of IV iron in femoral fracture surgery.

Method

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP databases were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing the outcomes of perioperative IV iron infusion with placebo in adults requiring surgical management for femoral fractures. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) were calculated with the inverse-variance method for continuous outcomes.

Results

Six RCTs with 1292 patients were included. No statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.75; 1.01, p = 0.058) between groups. Statistically significant difference in postoperative haemoglobin concentration was found between groups measured between day 4–7 of admission (MD = 1.93 g/L, 95%CI: 0.48; 3.39, p = 0.024), but not clinically significant. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in mortality rate, length of hospital stay, infection rate, or return to home rate.

Conclusion

Current evidence indicates that IV iron infusion alone does not provide any clinically significant benefit in femoral fracture surgery. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to explore its synergistic potential when used in combination with other perioperative optimisation methods, including tranexamic acid, erythropoietin and cell salvage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信