饮食失调症同伴指导计划:三年来,症状得到改善,入院人数减少。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Anita Raspovic, Rachael Duck, Andrew Synnot, Belinda Caldwell, Andrea Phillipou, David Castle, Richard Newton, Leah Brennan, Zoe Jenkins, Michelle Cunich, Sarah Maguire, Jane Miskovic-Wheatley
{"title":"饮食失调症同伴指导计划:三年来,症状得到改善,入院人数减少。","authors":"Anita Raspovic, Rachael Duck, Andrew Synnot, Belinda Caldwell, Andrea Phillipou, David Castle, Richard Newton, Leah Brennan, Zoe Jenkins, Michelle Cunich, Sarah Maguire, Jane Miskovic-Wheatley","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01051-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peer support involves people (mentors) using their own experiences to assist others (mentees). The impetus to include peer support in eating disorder recovery is high, however research on implementation of peer roles in eating disorder management is limited. A previous pilot study found positive but preliminary results for a Peer Mentor Program (PMP) for eating disorders. The PMP has since developed over time, including broadening its eligibility criteria and shifting to predominantly online delivery during COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the updated version of the PMP, on a larger and more diverse group of mentees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Previously collected PMP service data from July 2020 to April 2022 (during COVID-19 lockdowns) was evaluated for fifty-one mentees using mixed methods. Data from program start (baseline), mid-point (3-months) and end (6-months) for measures of eating disorder symptoms as measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and psychological wellbeing as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) was evaluated. Frequency of eating disorder-related hospital admissions during PMP participation versus the 6 months prior, direct program costs and qualitative mentee feedback were also analysed. One way ANOVA's with post hoc tests were used to evaluate symptom change and thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Program attendance averaged 12.12 (SD ± 1.57) of a possible 13 sessions. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were demonstrated across all subscales of the eating disorder and psychological wellbeing symptom measures. EDE-Q Global score and DASS scores decreased significantly by program end. Fewer eating disorder-related hospital admissions were reported during PMP than the 6-months prior. Qualitative findings were positive and themed around the unique benefits of lived experience connection, a new kind of space for recovery, hope and motivation for change. Challenges with the time limited nature of the mentee-mentor relationship were expressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The important benefits of a PMP for individuals with eating disorders are further supported. There is a pressing need for high quality, co-produced research, utilising a mixture of designs and fidelity to core peer work principles, to inform further implementation of peer work into eating disorder policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A peer mentoring program for eating disorders: improved symptomatology and reduced hospital admissions, three years and a pandemic on.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Raspovic, Rachael Duck, Andrew Synnot, Belinda Caldwell, Andrea Phillipou, David Castle, Richard Newton, Leah Brennan, Zoe Jenkins, Michelle Cunich, Sarah Maguire, Jane Miskovic-Wheatley\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-024-01051-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peer support involves people (mentors) using their own experiences to assist others (mentees). The impetus to include peer support in eating disorder recovery is high, however research on implementation of peer roles in eating disorder management is limited. A previous pilot study found positive but preliminary results for a Peer Mentor Program (PMP) for eating disorders. The PMP has since developed over time, including broadening its eligibility criteria and shifting to predominantly online delivery during COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the updated version of the PMP, on a larger and more diverse group of mentees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Previously collected PMP service data from July 2020 to April 2022 (during COVID-19 lockdowns) was evaluated for fifty-one mentees using mixed methods. Data from program start (baseline), mid-point (3-months) and end (6-months) for measures of eating disorder symptoms as measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and psychological wellbeing as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) was evaluated. Frequency of eating disorder-related hospital admissions during PMP participation versus the 6 months prior, direct program costs and qualitative mentee feedback were also analysed. One way ANOVA's with post hoc tests were used to evaluate symptom change and thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Program attendance averaged 12.12 (SD ± 1.57) of a possible 13 sessions. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were demonstrated across all subscales of the eating disorder and psychological wellbeing symptom measures. EDE-Q Global score and DASS scores decreased significantly by program end. Fewer eating disorder-related hospital admissions were reported during PMP than the 6-months prior. Qualitative findings were positive and themed around the unique benefits of lived experience connection, a new kind of space for recovery, hope and motivation for change. Challenges with the time limited nature of the mentee-mentor relationship were expressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The important benefits of a PMP for individuals with eating disorders are further supported. There is a pressing need for high quality, co-produced research, utilising a mixture of designs and fidelity to core peer work principles, to inform further implementation of peer work into eating disorder policy and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247779/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01051-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01051-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:同伴支持是指人们(指导者)利用自己的经验帮助他人(被指导者)。将同伴支持纳入饮食失调康复的推动力很大,但有关在饮食失调管理中实施同伴作用的研究却很有限。之前的一项试点研究发现,针对饮食失调症的同伴指导计划(PMP)取得了积极但初步的成果。随着时间的推移,PMP 也在不断发展,包括在 COVID-19 期间扩大了其资格标准,并转向主要通过网络提供服务。本研究旨在对更新版的 PMP 进行评估,评估对象包括更大、更多样化的被指导者群体:方法:采用混合方法对之前收集的 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 4 月(COVID-19 禁闭期间)的 PMP 服务数据进行评估,共涉及 51 名被指导者。评估了项目开始(基线)、中期(3 个月)和结束(6 个月)时的数据,包括饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)测量的饮食失调症状和抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS)测量的心理健康状况。此外,还分析了参与 PMP 期间与之前 6 个月饮食失调相关的入院频率、直接项目成本和被指导者的定性反馈。采用单向方差分析和事后检验来评估症状变化,并对定性数据进行主题分析:在可能的 13 次课程中,平均每次课程的参加人数为 12.12 (SD ± 1.57)。在饮食失调和心理健康症状测量的所有分量表中,均显示出具有统计学意义和临床意义的改善。在项目结束时,EDE-Q 总分和 DASS 分数都有明显下降。与之前的 6 个月相比,在 PMP 期间与饮食失调相关的入院人数有所减少。定性研究结果是积极的,其主题是生活经验联系的独特益处、一种新的康复空间、改变的希望和动力。结论:结论:PMP 对进食障碍患者的重要益处得到了进一步支持。目前迫切需要开展高质量的共同研究,利用各种设计和忠实于同伴工作核心原则的方法,为进一步将同伴工作纳入饮食失调政策和实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A peer mentoring program for eating disorders: improved symptomatology and reduced hospital admissions, three years and a pandemic on.

Background: Peer support involves people (mentors) using their own experiences to assist others (mentees). The impetus to include peer support in eating disorder recovery is high, however research on implementation of peer roles in eating disorder management is limited. A previous pilot study found positive but preliminary results for a Peer Mentor Program (PMP) for eating disorders. The PMP has since developed over time, including broadening its eligibility criteria and shifting to predominantly online delivery during COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the updated version of the PMP, on a larger and more diverse group of mentees.

Methods: Previously collected PMP service data from July 2020 to April 2022 (during COVID-19 lockdowns) was evaluated for fifty-one mentees using mixed methods. Data from program start (baseline), mid-point (3-months) and end (6-months) for measures of eating disorder symptoms as measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and psychological wellbeing as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) was evaluated. Frequency of eating disorder-related hospital admissions during PMP participation versus the 6 months prior, direct program costs and qualitative mentee feedback were also analysed. One way ANOVA's with post hoc tests were used to evaluate symptom change and thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data.

Results: Program attendance averaged 12.12 (SD ± 1.57) of a possible 13 sessions. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were demonstrated across all subscales of the eating disorder and psychological wellbeing symptom measures. EDE-Q Global score and DASS scores decreased significantly by program end. Fewer eating disorder-related hospital admissions were reported during PMP than the 6-months prior. Qualitative findings were positive and themed around the unique benefits of lived experience connection, a new kind of space for recovery, hope and motivation for change. Challenges with the time limited nature of the mentee-mentor relationship were expressed.

Conclusions: The important benefits of a PMP for individuals with eating disorders are further supported. There is a pressing need for high quality, co-produced research, utilising a mixture of designs and fidelity to core peer work principles, to inform further implementation of peer work into eating disorder policy and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信