与 COVID 相关的洗手行为的心理和社会心理决定因素:系统综述。

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Rachel Leonard, Sean R. O'Connor, Jennifer Hanratty, Ciara Keenan, Yuan Chi, Jenny Ferguson, Ariana Axiaq, Anna Volz, Ceri Welsh, Kerry Campbell, Victoria Hawkins, Sarah Miller, Declan Bradley, Martin Dempster
{"title":"与 COVID 相关的洗手行为的心理和社会心理决定因素:系统综述。","authors":"Rachel Leonard,&nbsp;Sean R. O'Connor,&nbsp;Jennifer Hanratty,&nbsp;Ciara Keenan,&nbsp;Yuan Chi,&nbsp;Jenny Ferguson,&nbsp;Ariana Axiaq,&nbsp;Anna Volz,&nbsp;Ceri Welsh,&nbsp;Kerry Campbell,&nbsp;Victoria Hawkins,&nbsp;Sarah Miller,&nbsp;Declan Bradley,&nbsp;Martin Dempster","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has resulted in illness, deaths and societal disruption on a global scale. Societies have implemented various control measures to reduce transmission of the virus and mitigate its impact. Individual behavioural changes are crucial to the successful implementation of these measures. One commonly recommended measure to limit risk of infection is frequent handwashing. It is important to identify those factors that can predict the uptake and maintenance of handwashing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence on malleable psychological and psychosocial factors that determine uptake and adherence to handwashing aimed at reducing the risk of infection or transmission of COVID-19.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched various literature sources including electronic databases (Medline ALL, Child Development &amp; Adolescent Studies, ERIC, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science), web searches, conference proceedings, government reports, other repositories of literature and grey literature. The search strategy was built around three concepts of interest including (1) context (terms relating to COVID-19), (2) behaviour of interest and (3) terms related to psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID Health-Related Behaviours and adherence or compliance with handwashing, to capture malleable determines. Searches capture studies up until October 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\n \n <p>Eligibility criteria included observational studies (both retrospective and prospective) and experimental studies that measure and report malleable psychological and psychosocial determinants and handwashing at an individual level, amongst the general public. Screening was supported by the Cochrane Crowd. Titles and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria by three independent screeners. Following this, all potentially relevant studies were screened at full-text level by the research team. All conflicts between screeners were resolved by discussion between the core research team.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\n \n <p>All data extraction was managed in EPPI-Reviewer software. All eligible studies, identified through full-text screening were extracted by one author. We extracted data on study information, population, determinant, behaviour and effects. A second author checked data extraction on 20% of all included papers. All conflicts were discussed by the two authors until consensus was reached.</p>\n \n <p>We assessed methodological quality of all included studies using an adapted version of the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our initial searches yielded 23,587 results, of which 56 studies were included in this review. The included studies were cross sectional in design, came from 22 countries and had a combined sample of 199,376 participants. The vast majority of studies had samples from the general public, with eight of the studies focusing on specific samples. All included studies considered people over the age of 18. The quality of the majority of the studies was good (<i>n</i> = 30 rated low risk of bias), with 8 rated high risk of bias, predominately due to lack of reporting of recruitment, sample characteristics and methodology. Thirty-four studies were included in the narrative synthesis and 28 in the meta-analysis.</p>\n \n <p>Findings indicated that emotions about COVID-19 (worry [0.381, confidence interval [CI] = 0.270–0.482, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 92%) and anxiety (0.308, CI = 0.154–0.448, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91%]), knowledge of COVID-19 (0.323, CI = 0.223–0.417, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94%), and perceived social norms (0.303, CI = 0.184–0.413, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 92%) were among the malleable determinants most associated with handwashing. Perceived severity (0.006, CI = -0.011–0.023) and susceptibility of COVID-19 (0.041, CI = −0.034 to 0.115) had little to no effect on handwashing behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the effects of various malleable determinants on COVID-related handwashing can aid in the development and implementation of interventions and public health campaigns to promote handwashing behaviour in potential new waves of COVID-19 or other respiratory infections. Emotions about COVID, knowledge of COVID and perceived social norms warrant further consideration in future research and policy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID-related handwashing behaviours: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Leonard,&nbsp;Sean R. O'Connor,&nbsp;Jennifer Hanratty,&nbsp;Ciara Keenan,&nbsp;Yuan Chi,&nbsp;Jenny Ferguson,&nbsp;Ariana Axiaq,&nbsp;Anna Volz,&nbsp;Ceri Welsh,&nbsp;Kerry Campbell,&nbsp;Victoria Hawkins,&nbsp;Sarah Miller,&nbsp;Declan Bradley,&nbsp;Martin Dempster\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cl2.1421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has resulted in illness, deaths and societal disruption on a global scale. Societies have implemented various control measures to reduce transmission of the virus and mitigate its impact. Individual behavioural changes are crucial to the successful implementation of these measures. One commonly recommended measure to limit risk of infection is frequent handwashing. It is important to identify those factors that can predict the uptake and maintenance of handwashing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence on malleable psychological and psychosocial factors that determine uptake and adherence to handwashing aimed at reducing the risk of infection or transmission of COVID-19.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Search Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched various literature sources including electronic databases (Medline ALL, Child Development &amp; Adolescent Studies, ERIC, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science), web searches, conference proceedings, government reports, other repositories of literature and grey literature. The search strategy was built around three concepts of interest including (1) context (terms relating to COVID-19), (2) behaviour of interest and (3) terms related to psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID Health-Related Behaviours and adherence or compliance with handwashing, to capture malleable determines. Searches capture studies up until October 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eligibility criteria included observational studies (both retrospective and prospective) and experimental studies that measure and report malleable psychological and psychosocial determinants and handwashing at an individual level, amongst the general public. Screening was supported by the Cochrane Crowd. Titles and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria by three independent screeners. Following this, all potentially relevant studies were screened at full-text level by the research team. All conflicts between screeners were resolved by discussion between the core research team.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\\n \\n <p>All data extraction was managed in EPPI-Reviewer software. All eligible studies, identified through full-text screening were extracted by one author. We extracted data on study information, population, determinant, behaviour and effects. A second author checked data extraction on 20% of all included papers. All conflicts were discussed by the two authors until consensus was reached.</p>\\n \\n <p>We assessed methodological quality of all included studies using an adapted version of the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our initial searches yielded 23,587 results, of which 56 studies were included in this review. The included studies were cross sectional in design, came from 22 countries and had a combined sample of 199,376 participants. The vast majority of studies had samples from the general public, with eight of the studies focusing on specific samples. All included studies considered people over the age of 18. The quality of the majority of the studies was good (<i>n</i> = 30 rated low risk of bias), with 8 rated high risk of bias, predominately due to lack of reporting of recruitment, sample characteristics and methodology. Thirty-four studies were included in the narrative synthesis and 28 in the meta-analysis.</p>\\n \\n <p>Findings indicated that emotions about COVID-19 (worry [0.381, confidence interval [CI] = 0.270–0.482, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 92%) and anxiety (0.308, CI = 0.154–0.448, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91%]), knowledge of COVID-19 (0.323, CI = 0.223–0.417, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94%), and perceived social norms (0.303, CI = 0.184–0.413, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 92%) were among the malleable determinants most associated with handwashing. Perceived severity (0.006, CI = -0.011–0.023) and susceptibility of COVID-19 (0.041, CI = −0.034 to 0.115) had little to no effect on handwashing behaviour.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Authors' Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Understanding the effects of various malleable determinants on COVID-related handwashing can aid in the development and implementation of interventions and public health campaigns to promote handwashing behaviour in potential new waves of COVID-19 or other respiratory infections. Emotions about COVID, knowledge of COVID and perceived social norms warrant further consideration in future research and policy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campbell Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campbell Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由 SARS-CoV-2 病毒引起的 COVID-19 大流行在全球范围内造成了疾病、死亡和社会混乱。社会已采取各种控制措施,以减少病毒传播并减轻其影响。个人行为的改变对这些措施的成功实施至关重要。通常推荐的一项限制感染风险的措施是勤洗手。确定哪些因素可以预测是否接受和坚持洗手非常重要:我们旨在确定并综合有关可塑心理和社会心理因素的证据,这些因素决定了是否采取和坚持洗手,从而降低感染或传播 COVID-19 的风险:我们搜索了各种文献来源,包括电子数据库(Medline ALL、儿童发展与青少年研究、ERIC、PsycInfo、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)、网络搜索、会议记录、政府报告、其他文献库和灰色文献。搜索策略围绕三个感兴趣的概念展开,包括:(1) 背景(与 COVID-19 相关的术语);(2) 感兴趣的行为;(3) 与 COVID 健康相关行为的心理和社会心理决定因素以及坚持或遵守洗手相关的术语,以捕捉可塑的决定因素。筛选标准:资格标准包括观察性研究(包括回顾性研究和前瞻性研究)和实验性研究,这些研究测量并报告了可塑的心理和社会心理决定因素以及普通大众个人层面的洗手情况。筛选工作得到了 Cochrane Crowd 的支持。三名独立筛选员根据资格标准对标题和摘要进行筛选。随后,研究团队对所有可能相关的研究进行全文筛选。筛选者之间的所有冲突均由核心研究团队讨论解决:所有数据提取均通过 EPPI-Reviewer 软件进行管理。通过全文筛选确定的所有符合条件的研究均由一位作者负责提取。我们提取了有关研究信息、人群、决定因素、行为和效果的数据。第二位作者检查了所有收录论文中 20% 的数据提取情况。我们使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的横断面研究质量评估工具(Quality appraisal tool)的改编版对所有纳入研究的方法学质量进行了评估:我们的初步搜索结果为 23,587 项,其中 56 项研究被纳入本综述。纳入的研究均为横断面设计,来自 22 个国家,共有 199376 名参与者。绝大多数研究的样本都来自普通公众,其中 8 项研究的重点是特定样本。所有纳入的研究都考虑了 18 岁以上的人群。大多数研究的质量良好(30 项研究被评为低偏倚风险),8 项研究被评为高偏倚风险,主要原因是缺乏对招募、样本特征和方法的报告。研究结果表明,COVID-19(担忧[0.381,置信区间[CI] = 0.270-0.482,I 2 = 92%)和焦虑(0.308,CI = 0.154-0.448,I 2 = 91%])、对 COVID-19 的了解(0.323,CI = 0.223-0.417,I 2 = 94%)和感知的社会规范(0.303,CI = 0.184-0.413,I 2 = 92%)是与洗手最相关的可塑决定因素。认为的严重程度(0.006,CI = -0.011-0.023)和 COVID-19 的易感性(0.041,CI = -0.034-0.115)对洗手行为几乎没有影响:了解各种可塑性决定因素对与 COVID 相关的洗手行为的影响有助于制定和实施干预措施和公共卫生运动,以促进在 COVID-19 或其他呼吸道感染的潜在新一波流行中的洗手行为。在未来的研究和政策中,需要进一步考虑对 COVID 的情绪、对 COVID 的了解以及对社会规范的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID-related handwashing behaviours: A systematic review

Psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID-related handwashing behaviours: A systematic review

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has resulted in illness, deaths and societal disruption on a global scale. Societies have implemented various control measures to reduce transmission of the virus and mitigate its impact. Individual behavioural changes are crucial to the successful implementation of these measures. One commonly recommended measure to limit risk of infection is frequent handwashing. It is important to identify those factors that can predict the uptake and maintenance of handwashing.

Objectives

We aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence on malleable psychological and psychosocial factors that determine uptake and adherence to handwashing aimed at reducing the risk of infection or transmission of COVID-19.

Search Methods

We searched various literature sources including electronic databases (Medline ALL, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, ERIC, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science), web searches, conference proceedings, government reports, other repositories of literature and grey literature. The search strategy was built around three concepts of interest including (1) context (terms relating to COVID-19), (2) behaviour of interest and (3) terms related to psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID Health-Related Behaviours and adherence or compliance with handwashing, to capture malleable determines. Searches capture studies up until October 2021.

Selection Criteria

Eligibility criteria included observational studies (both retrospective and prospective) and experimental studies that measure and report malleable psychological and psychosocial determinants and handwashing at an individual level, amongst the general public. Screening was supported by the Cochrane Crowd. Titles and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria by three independent screeners. Following this, all potentially relevant studies were screened at full-text level by the research team. All conflicts between screeners were resolved by discussion between the core research team.

Data Collection and Analysis

All data extraction was managed in EPPI-Reviewer software. All eligible studies, identified through full-text screening were extracted by one author. We extracted data on study information, population, determinant, behaviour and effects. A second author checked data extraction on 20% of all included papers. All conflicts were discussed by the two authors until consensus was reached.

We assessed methodological quality of all included studies using an adapted version of the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies.

Main Results

Our initial searches yielded 23,587 results, of which 56 studies were included in this review. The included studies were cross sectional in design, came from 22 countries and had a combined sample of 199,376 participants. The vast majority of studies had samples from the general public, with eight of the studies focusing on specific samples. All included studies considered people over the age of 18. The quality of the majority of the studies was good (n = 30 rated low risk of bias), with 8 rated high risk of bias, predominately due to lack of reporting of recruitment, sample characteristics and methodology. Thirty-four studies were included in the narrative synthesis and 28 in the meta-analysis.

Findings indicated that emotions about COVID-19 (worry [0.381, confidence interval [CI] = 0.270–0.482, I2 = 92%) and anxiety (0.308, CI = 0.154–0.448, I2 = 91%]), knowledge of COVID-19 (0.323, CI = 0.223–0.417, I2 = 94%), and perceived social norms (0.303, CI = 0.184–0.413, I2 = 92%) were among the malleable determinants most associated with handwashing. Perceived severity (0.006, CI = -0.011–0.023) and susceptibility of COVID-19 (0.041, CI = −0.034 to 0.115) had little to no effect on handwashing behaviour.

Authors' Conclusions

Understanding the effects of various malleable determinants on COVID-related handwashing can aid in the development and implementation of interventions and public health campaigns to promote handwashing behaviour in potential new waves of COVID-19 or other respiratory infections. Emotions about COVID, knowledge of COVID and perceived social norms warrant further consideration in future research and policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信