荷兰旅行者的狂犬病知识差距和风险行为:一项观察性队列研究。

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lisanne A. Overduin , Jan Pieter R. Koopman , Corine Prins , Petra H. Verbeek-Menken , Cornelis A. de Pijper , Fiona Heerink , Perry J.J. van Genderen , Martin P. Grobusch , Leo G. Visser
{"title":"荷兰旅行者的狂犬病知识差距和风险行为:一项观察性队列研究。","authors":"Lisanne A. Overduin ,&nbsp;Jan Pieter R. Koopman ,&nbsp;Corine Prins ,&nbsp;Petra H. Verbeek-Menken ,&nbsp;Cornelis A. de Pijper ,&nbsp;Fiona Heerink ,&nbsp;Perry J.J. van Genderen ,&nbsp;Martin P. Grobusch ,&nbsp;Leo G. Visser","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Travellers visiting rabies-endemic countries are at risk of rabies infection. Assessing travellers’ knowledge and risk perception of rabies and risk behaviour during travel can help identify knowledge gaps and improve pre-travel risk education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cohort study in Dutch adult travellers, using two surveys: one before travel to assess knowledge and perception of rabies, and one after return to identify risk behaviour during travel.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pre-travel and post-travel survey were completed by 301 and 276 participants, respectively. 222 participants had travelled to a high-risk rabies-endemic country. 21.6 % of the participants scored their rabies knowledge as poor. Some participants were unaware cats or bats can transmit rabies (26.6 % and 13.6 %, respectively), or that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is required for certain exposures such as skin abrasions without bleeding or licks on damaged skin (35.5 % and 18.9 %, respectively), while 27.9 % of participants did not know PEP needs to be administered within one day. 115 participants (51.8 %) reported any form of contact with any animal during travel. Two participants reported animal exposure, of which one took adequate PEP measures. Risk factors for animal contact abroad were regularly touching cats or dogs at home or abroad, longer travel duration, having pets during childhood and being an animal lover.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pre-travel rabies risk education currently does not meet travellers’ needs, which is reflected in knowledge gaps and engagement in risk behaviour during travel. During pre-travel health advice, avoiding animal contact abroad should be emphasized, and additional education is required about indications for PEP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102739"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000553/pdfft?md5=5742eff9ca05f3a9fd4417ff9c08ea9b&pid=1-s2.0-S1477893924000553-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rabies knowledge gaps and risk behaviour in Dutch travellers: An observational cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Lisanne A. Overduin ,&nbsp;Jan Pieter R. Koopman ,&nbsp;Corine Prins ,&nbsp;Petra H. Verbeek-Menken ,&nbsp;Cornelis A. de Pijper ,&nbsp;Fiona Heerink ,&nbsp;Perry J.J. van Genderen ,&nbsp;Martin P. Grobusch ,&nbsp;Leo G. Visser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Travellers visiting rabies-endemic countries are at risk of rabies infection. Assessing travellers’ knowledge and risk perception of rabies and risk behaviour during travel can help identify knowledge gaps and improve pre-travel risk education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cohort study in Dutch adult travellers, using two surveys: one before travel to assess knowledge and perception of rabies, and one after return to identify risk behaviour during travel.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pre-travel and post-travel survey were completed by 301 and 276 participants, respectively. 222 participants had travelled to a high-risk rabies-endemic country. 21.6 % of the participants scored their rabies knowledge as poor. Some participants were unaware cats or bats can transmit rabies (26.6 % and 13.6 %, respectively), or that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is required for certain exposures such as skin abrasions without bleeding or licks on damaged skin (35.5 % and 18.9 %, respectively), while 27.9 % of participants did not know PEP needs to be administered within one day. 115 participants (51.8 %) reported any form of contact with any animal during travel. Two participants reported animal exposure, of which one took adequate PEP measures. Risk factors for animal contact abroad were regularly touching cats or dogs at home or abroad, longer travel duration, having pets during childhood and being an animal lover.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pre-travel rabies risk education currently does not meet travellers’ needs, which is reflected in knowledge gaps and engagement in risk behaviour during travel. During pre-travel health advice, avoiding animal contact abroad should be emphasized, and additional education is required about indications for PEP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000553/pdfft?md5=5742eff9ca05f3a9fd4417ff9c08ea9b&pid=1-s2.0-S1477893924000553-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前往狂犬病流行国家的旅行者有感染狂犬病的风险。评估旅行者对狂犬病的知识和风险认知以及旅行期间的风险行为有助于找出知识差距并改进旅行前的风险教育:方法:对荷兰成年旅行者进行队列研究,使用两次调查:一次在旅行前,评估对狂犬病的知识和看法;一次在回国后,确定旅行期间的风险行为:结果:分别有 301 名和 276 名参与者完成了旅行前和旅行后调查。222名参与者曾前往狂犬病高风险流行国家旅行。21.6%的参与者对狂犬病知识知之甚少。一些参与者不知道猫或蝙蝠会传播狂犬病(分别为 26.6% 和 13.6%),也不知道某些接触需要进行接触后预防(PEP),例如没有出血的皮肤擦伤或舔舐受损皮肤(分别为 35.5% 和 18.9%),还有 27.9% 的参与者不知道需要在一天内进行接触后预防。115 名参与者(51.8%)报告在旅行期间与任何动物有过任何形式的接触。两名参与者报告了接触动物的情况,其中一人采取了适当的预防措施。在国外接触动物的风险因素包括:经常在国内或国外接触猫或狗、旅行时间较长、童年时养过宠物以及是动物爱好者:目前,旅行前狂犬病风险教育并不能满足旅行者的需求,这反映在知识缺口和旅行期间的风险行为上。在旅行前的健康建议中,应强调避免在国外接触动物,并需要增加有关预防性治疗适应症的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rabies knowledge gaps and risk behaviour in Dutch travellers: An observational cohort study

Background

Travellers visiting rabies-endemic countries are at risk of rabies infection. Assessing travellers’ knowledge and risk perception of rabies and risk behaviour during travel can help identify knowledge gaps and improve pre-travel risk education.

Methods

Cohort study in Dutch adult travellers, using two surveys: one before travel to assess knowledge and perception of rabies, and one after return to identify risk behaviour during travel.

Results

The pre-travel and post-travel survey were completed by 301 and 276 participants, respectively. 222 participants had travelled to a high-risk rabies-endemic country. 21.6 % of the participants scored their rabies knowledge as poor. Some participants were unaware cats or bats can transmit rabies (26.6 % and 13.6 %, respectively), or that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is required for certain exposures such as skin abrasions without bleeding or licks on damaged skin (35.5 % and 18.9 %, respectively), while 27.9 % of participants did not know PEP needs to be administered within one day. 115 participants (51.8 %) reported any form of contact with any animal during travel. Two participants reported animal exposure, of which one took adequate PEP measures. Risk factors for animal contact abroad were regularly touching cats or dogs at home or abroad, longer travel duration, having pets during childhood and being an animal lover.

Conclusions

Pre-travel rabies risk education currently does not meet travellers’ needs, which is reflected in knowledge gaps and engagement in risk behaviour during travel. During pre-travel health advice, avoiding animal contact abroad should be emphasized, and additional education is required about indications for PEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信