三个大型医疗系统中标示外直接口服抗凝药的给药时间。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Grace C Herron, Deborah DeCamillo, Xiaowen Kong, Brian Haymart, Scott Kaatz, Stacy Ellsworth, Mona A Ali, Christopher Giuliano, James B Froehlich, Geoffrey D Barnes
{"title":"三个大型医疗系统中标示外直接口服抗凝药的给药时间。","authors":"Grace C Herron, Deborah DeCamillo, Xiaowen Kong, Brian Haymart, Scott Kaatz, Stacy Ellsworth, Mona A Ali, Christopher Giuliano, James B Froehlich, Geoffrey D Barnes","doi":"10.1055/a-2365-8681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to better characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI<sup>2</sup>) registry, a retrospective quality-improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 to 2022 on the number of \"alerts\" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration instructions for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Among a sample of 789 to 1,022 annual AF patients and 381 to 484 annual VTE patients prescribed a DOAC in the MAQI<sup>2</sup> registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period (2018-2022), there were 569 alerts for AF patients and 162 alerts for VTE patients. Alerts occurred more frequently during follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing in AF patients (78.2 vs. 21.8%), but more commonly at initial prescribing in VTE patients (59.9 vs. 40.1%). After initial review by quality-improvement abstractors, 19.3% of AF alerts and 14.8% of VTE alerts resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention about 75% of the time for both populations. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC, particularly for patients with AF, as off-label prescribing occurs frequently during the follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":23036,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Three Large Health Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Grace C Herron, Deborah DeCamillo, Xiaowen Kong, Brian Haymart, Scott Kaatz, Stacy Ellsworth, Mona A Ali, Christopher Giuliano, James B Froehlich, Geoffrey D Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2365-8681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to better characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI<sup>2</sup>) registry, a retrospective quality-improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 to 2022 on the number of \\\"alerts\\\" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration instructions for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Among a sample of 789 to 1,022 annual AF patients and 381 to 484 annual VTE patients prescribed a DOAC in the MAQI<sup>2</sup> registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period (2018-2022), there were 569 alerts for AF patients and 162 alerts for VTE patients. Alerts occurred more frequently during follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing in AF patients (78.2 vs. 21.8%), but more commonly at initial prescribing in VTE patients (59.9 vs. 40.1%). After initial review by quality-improvement abstractors, 19.3% of AF alerts and 14.8% of VTE alerts resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention about 75% of the time for both populations. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC, particularly for patients with AF, as off-label prescribing occurs frequently during the follow-up period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2365-8681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2365-8681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然直接口服抗凝药(DOACs)可能被认为比华法林更容易管理,但它们也有自己独特的管理难题,导致经常出现标签外用药。目前尚不清楚患者在开始使用 DOAC 时与治疗后期发生标示外用药的程度:我们旨在确定标示外 DOAC 用药的发生时间,并通过基于登记的干预措施评估处方监督的有效性:我们评估了密歇根州抗凝质量改进倡议(MAQI2)登记处的数据,这是一个使用数据抽取者的回顾性质量改进过程,从 2018 年到 2022 年,针对剂量偏离循证指南而产生的 "警报 "数量:在MAQI2登记的1261至1563名每年接受DOAC治疗的患者样本中,标签外用药相对普遍。从 2018 年到 2022 年的 5 年间,共有 735 次用药警报。与初次处方时相比,随访期间发生警报的频率更高,分别为 69.0%(507 例)和 31.0%(228 例)。在质量改进摘要员进行初步审查后,18.2% 的警报(134 例)导致与开处方者联系。在与开药者取得联系后,74.6% 的情况下会采取干预措施。最常见的干预措施是改变 DOAC 的剂量:这项研究证明了使用基于登记的干预措施对 DOAC 处方进行监督的益处,该干预措施可在患者处方 DOAC 的整个期间监控标示外剂量,因为在随访期间,循证处方的偏差经常发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing of Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Three Large Health Systems.

Background:  While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.

Objectives:  We aimed to better characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.

Methods:  We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry, a retrospective quality-improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 to 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration instructions for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Results:  Among a sample of 789 to 1,022 annual AF patients and 381 to 484 annual VTE patients prescribed a DOAC in the MAQI2 registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period (2018-2022), there were 569 alerts for AF patients and 162 alerts for VTE patients. Alerts occurred more frequently during follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing in AF patients (78.2 vs. 21.8%), but more commonly at initial prescribing in VTE patients (59.9 vs. 40.1%). After initial review by quality-improvement abstractors, 19.3% of AF alerts and 14.8% of VTE alerts resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention about 75% of the time for both populations. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.

Conclusion:  This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC, particularly for patients with AF, as off-label prescribing occurs frequently during the follow-up period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Thrombosis and haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thrombosis and Haemostasis publishes reports on basic, translational and clinical research dedicated to novel results and highest quality in any area of thrombosis and haemostasis, vascular biology and medicine, inflammation and infection, platelet and leukocyte biology, from genetic, molecular & cellular studies, diagnostic, therapeutic & preventative studies to high-level translational and clinical research. The journal provides position and guideline papers, state-of-the-art papers, expert analysis and commentaries, and dedicated theme issues covering recent developments and key topics in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信