数字时代的生育问题:基于调查的生育应用程序用户生活质量评估》。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01650-4
Emily Allard-Phillips, Gregory M Christman, Robert Stanford Williams, Stephanie L Filipp, Danielle Snyder, Peter Chang, Alice Rhoton-Vlasak
{"title":"数字时代的生育问题:基于调查的生育应用程序用户生活质量评估》。","authors":"Emily Allard-Phillips, Gregory M Christman, Robert Stanford Williams, Stephanie L Filipp, Danielle Snyder, Peter Chang, Alice Rhoton-Vlasak","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01650-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to characterize fertility app use among women seen for infertility care and to investigate the association between fertility app use and quality of life. This survey-based study was conducted at an academic infertility clinic. Surveys were administered to patients who presented for a new infertility visit. One survey collected information regarding app use and the second survey was FertiQoL, an internationally validated instrument measuring quality of life in those with infertility. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population regarding app use and FertiQoL scores. Comparisons between those who did and didn't use an app were evaluated using t-tests and Cochran Armitage test for trend. 149 surveys were collected. Most (75.5%) participants reported using a fertility app. Most participants (85.1%) used a free app and nearly all (97.2%) found their app helpful. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0034) in satisfaction with one's quality of life between app users and non-app users with app users demonstrating higher satisfaction. There were no significant differences between app users and non-app users with their overall FertiQoL scores however there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031) in Relational sub-scores with app users displaying higher scores. While overall quality of life, measured by standardized measures, did not differ, self-perceived satisfaction with quality of life improved with more satisfaction reported in those using an app. This self-perceived satisfaction and increased quality of life surrounding relationships carries important implications, especially when one may face the stress of infertility and its treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertility in the Digital Age: A Survey-Based Evaluation of Fertility App Users' Quality of Life.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Allard-Phillips, Gregory M Christman, Robert Stanford Williams, Stephanie L Filipp, Danielle Snyder, Peter Chang, Alice Rhoton-Vlasak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01650-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study sought to characterize fertility app use among women seen for infertility care and to investigate the association between fertility app use and quality of life. This survey-based study was conducted at an academic infertility clinic. Surveys were administered to patients who presented for a new infertility visit. One survey collected information regarding app use and the second survey was FertiQoL, an internationally validated instrument measuring quality of life in those with infertility. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population regarding app use and FertiQoL scores. Comparisons between those who did and didn't use an app were evaluated using t-tests and Cochran Armitage test for trend. 149 surveys were collected. Most (75.5%) participants reported using a fertility app. Most participants (85.1%) used a free app and nearly all (97.2%) found their app helpful. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0034) in satisfaction with one's quality of life between app users and non-app users with app users demonstrating higher satisfaction. There were no significant differences between app users and non-app users with their overall FertiQoL scores however there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031) in Relational sub-scores with app users displaying higher scores. While overall quality of life, measured by standardized measures, did not differ, self-perceived satisfaction with quality of life improved with more satisfaction reported in those using an app. This self-perceived satisfaction and increased quality of life surrounding relationships carries important implications, especially when one may face the stress of infertility and its treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01650-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01650-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解接受不孕不育治疗的妇女使用生育应用程序的情况,并调查生育应用程序的使用与生活质量之间的关系。这项基于调查的研究在一家学术性不孕不育诊所进行。调查对象为新就诊的不孕症患者。其中一项调查收集了有关应用程序使用情况的信息,第二项调查是 FertiQoL,这是一种经过国际验证的测量不孕症患者生活质量的工具。我们使用描述性统计来描述患者群体在应用程序使用和 FertiQoL 评分方面的特征。使用 t 检验和 Cochran Armitage 趋势检验对使用和未使用应用程序的患者进行了比较评估。共收集了 149 份调查问卷。大多数参与者(75.5%)表示使用过生育应用程序。大多数参与者(85.1%)使用免费应用程序,几乎所有参与者(97.2%)都认为他们的应用程序很有用。应用程序用户和非应用程序用户对生活质量的满意度存在明显差异(p = 0.0034),应用程序用户的满意度更高。在 FertiQoL 总分上,应用程序用户和非应用程序用户之间没有明显差异,但在关系分项得分上,应用程序用户的得分更高,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.031)。虽然通过标准化测量方法衡量的总体生活质量没有差异,但使用应用程序的人对生活质量的自我感觉满意度有所提高,报告的满意度更高。这种围绕人际关系的自我感觉满意度和生活质量的提高具有重要意义,尤其是当人们可能面临不孕症及其治疗的压力时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fertility in the Digital Age: A Survey-Based Evaluation of Fertility App Users' Quality of Life.

This study sought to characterize fertility app use among women seen for infertility care and to investigate the association between fertility app use and quality of life. This survey-based study was conducted at an academic infertility clinic. Surveys were administered to patients who presented for a new infertility visit. One survey collected information regarding app use and the second survey was FertiQoL, an internationally validated instrument measuring quality of life in those with infertility. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population regarding app use and FertiQoL scores. Comparisons between those who did and didn't use an app were evaluated using t-tests and Cochran Armitage test for trend. 149 surveys were collected. Most (75.5%) participants reported using a fertility app. Most participants (85.1%) used a free app and nearly all (97.2%) found their app helpful. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0034) in satisfaction with one's quality of life between app users and non-app users with app users demonstrating higher satisfaction. There were no significant differences between app users and non-app users with their overall FertiQoL scores however there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031) in Relational sub-scores with app users displaying higher scores. While overall quality of life, measured by standardized measures, did not differ, self-perceived satisfaction with quality of life improved with more satisfaction reported in those using an app. This self-perceived satisfaction and increased quality of life surrounding relationships carries important implications, especially when one may face the stress of infertility and its treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信