良性前列腺增生症患者前列腺钬激光去核术疗效不佳的术前预测因素。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kyohei Watanabe, Atsushi Otsuka, Yuichi Kitagawa, Asuka Sano, Ryo Sato, Yuto Matsushita, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Keita Tamura, Daisuke Motoyama, Toshiki Ito, Sanki Takada, Hideaki Miyake
{"title":"良性前列腺增生症患者前列腺钬激光去核术疗效不佳的术前预测因素。","authors":"Kyohei Watanabe,&nbsp;Atsushi Otsuka,&nbsp;Yuichi Kitagawa,&nbsp;Asuka Sano,&nbsp;Ryo Sato,&nbsp;Yuto Matsushita,&nbsp;Hiromitsu Watanabe,&nbsp;Keita Tamura,&nbsp;Daisuke Motoyama,&nbsp;Toshiki Ito,&nbsp;Sanki Takada,&nbsp;Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1111/luts.12530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We assessed preoperative factors predicting the poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The present study included 159 patients who underwent HoLEP between August 2015 and June 2021 at our institution. Overall therapeutic efficacy was divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacies according to changes in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QOL), and the maximum urinary flow rate. Patients were divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacy groups based on findings obtained 3 months after HoLEP, and comparative assessments were performed between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP was poor in 53 (33.3%) out of 159 patients. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP), IPSS, IPSS-QOL, post-void residual volume (PVR), and the presence of overactive bladder (OAB) were significantly higher in the poor therapeutic efficacy group than in the good therapeutic efficacy group. A multivariable analysis of several factors identified the preoperative presence of OAB and short IPP as independent risk factors for the poor therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP. When treatment efficacy was divided according to risk factors, poor therapeutic efficacy was observed in only 14% of patients with prolonged IPP and the absence of OAB.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP may be poor in patients with OAB and short IPP, resulting in the significant deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms. Accordingly, it is important to consider the presence or absence of OAB and IPP measurements when selecting indications for HoLEP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18028,"journal":{"name":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative factors predicting poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia\",\"authors\":\"Kyohei Watanabe,&nbsp;Atsushi Otsuka,&nbsp;Yuichi Kitagawa,&nbsp;Asuka Sano,&nbsp;Ryo Sato,&nbsp;Yuto Matsushita,&nbsp;Hiromitsu Watanabe,&nbsp;Keita Tamura,&nbsp;Daisuke Motoyama,&nbsp;Toshiki Ito,&nbsp;Sanki Takada,&nbsp;Hideaki Miyake\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/luts.12530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>We assessed preoperative factors predicting the poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present study included 159 patients who underwent HoLEP between August 2015 and June 2021 at our institution. Overall therapeutic efficacy was divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacies according to changes in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QOL), and the maximum urinary flow rate. Patients were divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacy groups based on findings obtained 3 months after HoLEP, and comparative assessments were performed between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP was poor in 53 (33.3%) out of 159 patients. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP), IPSS, IPSS-QOL, post-void residual volume (PVR), and the presence of overactive bladder (OAB) were significantly higher in the poor therapeutic efficacy group than in the good therapeutic efficacy group. A multivariable analysis of several factors identified the preoperative presence of OAB and short IPP as independent risk factors for the poor therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP. When treatment efficacy was divided according to risk factors, poor therapeutic efficacy was observed in only 14% of patients with prolonged IPP and the absence of OAB.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP may be poor in patients with OAB and short IPP, resulting in the significant deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms. Accordingly, it is important to consider the presence or absence of OAB and IPP measurements when selecting indications for HoLEP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.12530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.12530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们评估了良性前列腺增生症(BPH)患者接受前列腺钬激光去核术(HoLEP)疗效不佳的术前预测因素:本研究纳入了2015年8月至2021年6月期间在我院接受HoLEP术的159例患者。根据国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、IPSS生活质量(IPSS-QOL)和最大尿流率的变化,将总体疗效分为疗效好和疗效差。根据HoLEP术后3个月的结果将患者分为疗效好和疗效差两组,并对两组进行比较评估:结果:159 名患者中有 53 人(33.3%)的 HoLEP 疗效不佳。疗效差组的膀胱内前列腺突出(IPP)、IPSS、IPSS-QOL、排尿后残余尿量(PVR)和膀胱过度活动症(OAB)明显高于疗效好组。对多个因素进行的多变量分析表明,术前存在膀胱过度活动症和IPP短是导致HoLEP疗效不佳的独立风险因素。根据风险因素对疗效进行划分后发现,只有14%的患者IPP时间长且无OAB,疗效较差:结论:对于 OAB 和 IPP 较短的患者,HoLEP 的疗效可能较差,导致下尿路症状明显恶化。因此,在选择 HoLEP 的适应症时,必须考虑是否存在 OAB 和 IPP 测量值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative factors predicting poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objectives

We assessed preoperative factors predicting the poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.

Methods

The present study included 159 patients who underwent HoLEP between August 2015 and June 2021 at our institution. Overall therapeutic efficacy was divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacies according to changes in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QOL), and the maximum urinary flow rate. Patients were divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacy groups based on findings obtained 3 months after HoLEP, and comparative assessments were performed between the two groups.

Results

The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP was poor in 53 (33.3%) out of 159 patients. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP), IPSS, IPSS-QOL, post-void residual volume (PVR), and the presence of overactive bladder (OAB) were significantly higher in the poor therapeutic efficacy group than in the good therapeutic efficacy group. A multivariable analysis of several factors identified the preoperative presence of OAB and short IPP as independent risk factors for the poor therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP. When treatment efficacy was divided according to risk factors, poor therapeutic efficacy was observed in only 14% of patients with prolonged IPP and the absence of OAB.

Conclusions

The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP may be poor in patients with OAB and short IPP, resulting in the significant deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms. Accordingly, it is important to consider the presence or absence of OAB and IPP measurements when selecting indications for HoLEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: LUTS is designed for the timely communication of peer-reviewed studies which provides new clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers in the field of neurourology, urodynamics and urogynecology. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished referees from around the world, some of whom constitute the journal''s Editorial Board. The journal covers both basic and clinical research on lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD), such as overactive bladder (OAB), detrusor underactivity, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), painful bladder syndrome (PBS), as well as on other relevant conditions. Case reports are published only if new findings are provided. LUTS is an official journal of the Japanese Continence Society, the Korean Continence Society, and the Taiwanese Continence Society. Submission of papers from all countries are welcome. LUTS has been accepted into Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) with a 2011 Impact Factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信