通过显微 CT 测定使用三种封闭技术的两种硅酸三钙封闭剂的孔隙率。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jinah Kim, Kali Vo, Gurmukh S Dhaliwal, Aya Takase, Carolyn Primus, Takashi Komabayashi
{"title":"通过显微 CT 测定使用三种封闭技术的两种硅酸三钙封闭剂的孔隙率。","authors":"Jinah Kim, Kali Vo, Gurmukh S Dhaliwal, Aya Takase, Carolyn Primus, Takashi Komabayashi","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.24-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the aim of this study was to measure the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers (EndoSequence BC and NeoSealer Flo) applied using three obturation techniques (single-cone, warm-vertical, and cold-lateral) to six single-rooted human teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six extracted, single-rooted human teeth were shaped with ProTaper Next rotary files and obturated with EndoSequence BC or NeoSealer Flo sealers and gutta-percha (GP) using one of the three techniques above. Micro-CT was used to map the full length of the canals. Deep learning cross-sectional segmentation was used to analyze image slices of the apical (0-2 mm) and coronal (14-16 mm from the apex) regions (n = 230-261 per tooth) for the areas of GP and sealer, as well as porosity. Median (%) with interquartile range of porosity were calculated , and the results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the apical region, EndoSequence BC had significantly fewer pores than NeoSealer Flo with the single-cone obturation (% median-interquartile range, IQR: 0.00-1.62) and warm-vertical condensation (5.57-10.32) techniques, whereas in the coronal region, NeoSealer Flo had significantly fewer pores than EndoSequence BC with these two techniques (0.39-5.02) and (0.10-0.19), respectively. There was no significant difference in porosity between the two sealers for the cold-lateral condensation technique in both the apical and coronal regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For optimal obturation, the choice of technique and sealer is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-CT determination of the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers applied using three obturation techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Jinah Kim, Kali Vo, Gurmukh S Dhaliwal, Aya Takase, Carolyn Primus, Takashi Komabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.2334/josnusd.24-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the aim of this study was to measure the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers (EndoSequence BC and NeoSealer Flo) applied using three obturation techniques (single-cone, warm-vertical, and cold-lateral) to six single-rooted human teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six extracted, single-rooted human teeth were shaped with ProTaper Next rotary files and obturated with EndoSequence BC or NeoSealer Flo sealers and gutta-percha (GP) using one of the three techniques above. Micro-CT was used to map the full length of the canals. Deep learning cross-sectional segmentation was used to analyze image slices of the apical (0-2 mm) and coronal (14-16 mm from the apex) regions (n = 230-261 per tooth) for the areas of GP and sealer, as well as porosity. Median (%) with interquartile range of porosity were calculated , and the results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the apical region, EndoSequence BC had significantly fewer pores than NeoSealer Flo with the single-cone obturation (% median-interquartile range, IQR: 0.00-1.62) and warm-vertical condensation (5.57-10.32) techniques, whereas in the coronal region, NeoSealer Flo had significantly fewer pores than EndoSequence BC with these two techniques (0.39-5.02) and (0.10-0.19), respectively. There was no significant difference in porosity between the two sealers for the cold-lateral condensation technique in both the apical and coronal regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For optimal obturation, the choice of technique and sealer is critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.24-0031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.24-0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是使用 X 射线显微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)测量两种硅酸三钙封闭剂(EndoSequence BC 和 NeoSealer Flo)在六颗单根人类牙齿上使用三种封闭技术(单锥形、温-垂直和冷-侧向)时的孔隙率:使用 ProTaper Next 旋转锉对六颗拔出的单根人类牙齿进行塑形,并使用 EndoSequence BC 或 NeoSealer Flo 封闭剂和古塔波瓷(GP)采用上述三种技术中的一种进行封闭。使用显微计算机断层扫描(Micro-CT)绘制全长的牙槽骨图。使用深度学习横截面分割法分析根尖(0-2 毫米)和冠状(距根尖 14-16 毫米)区域的图像切片(n = 230-261,每颗牙齿),以确定 GP 和封闭剂的面积以及孔隙率。计算了孔隙率的中位数(%)和四分位距,并用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对结果进行了统计分析:结果:在根尖区,采用单锥封闭(中位数-四分位数范围,IQR:0.00-1.62)和温垂直冷凝(5.57-10.32)技术时,EndoSequence BC的孔隙明显少于NeoSealer Flo;而在冠状区,采用这两种技术时,NeoSealer Flo的孔隙明显少于EndoSequence BC(分别为0.39-5.02)和(0.10-0.19)。在冷侧凝技术中,两种封闭剂在根尖区和冠状区的孔隙率没有明显差异:结论:为了达到最佳的封闭效果,选择技术和封闭剂至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Micro-CT determination of the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers applied using three obturation techniques.

Purpose: Using X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the aim of this study was to measure the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers (EndoSequence BC and NeoSealer Flo) applied using three obturation techniques (single-cone, warm-vertical, and cold-lateral) to six single-rooted human teeth.

Methods: Six extracted, single-rooted human teeth were shaped with ProTaper Next rotary files and obturated with EndoSequence BC or NeoSealer Flo sealers and gutta-percha (GP) using one of the three techniques above. Micro-CT was used to map the full length of the canals. Deep learning cross-sectional segmentation was used to analyze image slices of the apical (0-2 mm) and coronal (14-16 mm from the apex) regions (n = 230-261 per tooth) for the areas of GP and sealer, as well as porosity. Median (%) with interquartile range of porosity were calculated , and the results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: In the apical region, EndoSequence BC had significantly fewer pores than NeoSealer Flo with the single-cone obturation (% median-interquartile range, IQR: 0.00-1.62) and warm-vertical condensation (5.57-10.32) techniques, whereas in the coronal region, NeoSealer Flo had significantly fewer pores than EndoSequence BC with these two techniques (0.39-5.02) and (0.10-0.19), respectively. There was no significant difference in porosity between the two sealers for the cold-lateral condensation technique in both the apical and coronal regions.

Conclusion: For optimal obturation, the choice of technique and sealer is critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信