影响手术后肺功能预测值与长期实际值之间差异的临床因素。

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Clinical Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005395
Jae-Woo Ju, Minseok Suh, Hongyoon Choi, Kwon Jooong Na, Samina Park, Gi Jeong Cheon, Young Tae Kim
{"title":"影响手术后肺功能预测值与长期实际值之间差异的临床因素。","authors":"Jae-Woo Ju, Minseok Suh, Hongyoon Choi, Kwon Jooong Na, Samina Park, Gi Jeong Cheon, Young Tae Kim","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung cancer surgery outcomes depend heavily on preoperative pulmonary reserve, with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) being a critical preoperative evaluation factor. Our study investigates the discrepancies between predicted and long-term actual postoperative lung function, focusing on clinical factors affecting these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study encompassed lung cancer patients who underwent preoperative lung perfusion SPECT/CT between 2015 and 2021. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests, considering factors such as surgery type, resected volume, and patient history including tuberculosis. Predicted postoperative lung function was calculated using SPECT/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 216 patients (men:women, 150:66; age, 67.9 ± 8.7 years), predicted postoperative FEV1% (ppoFEV1%) showed significant correlation with actual postoperative FEV1% ( r = 0.667; P < 0.001). Paired t test revealed that ppoFEV1% was significantly lower compared with actual postoperative FEV1% ( P < 0.001). The study identified video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98-7.69; P < 0.001) and higher percentage of resected volume (OR per 1% increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = 0.014) as significant predictors of postsurgical lung function improvement. Conversely, for the decline in lung function postsurgery, significant predictors included lower percentage of resected lung volume (OR per 1% increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98; P = 0.011), higher preoperative FEV1% (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.009), and the presence of tuberculosis (OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.48-18.15; P = 0.010). Additionally, in a subgroup of patients with borderline lung function, VATS was related with improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that in more than half of the patients, actual postsurgical lung function exceeded predicted values, particularly following VATS and with higher volume of lung resection. It also identifies lower resected lung volume, higher preoperative FEV1%, and tuberculosis as factors associated with a postsurgical decline in lung function. The study underscores the need for precise preoperative lung function assessment and tailored postoperative management, with particular attention to patients with relevant clinical factors. Future research should focus on validation of clinical factors and exploring tailored approaches to lung cancer surgery and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e574-e579"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Factors Affecting Discrepancy Between Predicted and Long-term Actual Lung Function Following Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jae-Woo Ju, Minseok Suh, Hongyoon Choi, Kwon Jooong Na, Samina Park, Gi Jeong Cheon, Young Tae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung cancer surgery outcomes depend heavily on preoperative pulmonary reserve, with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) being a critical preoperative evaluation factor. Our study investigates the discrepancies between predicted and long-term actual postoperative lung function, focusing on clinical factors affecting these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study encompassed lung cancer patients who underwent preoperative lung perfusion SPECT/CT between 2015 and 2021. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests, considering factors such as surgery type, resected volume, and patient history including tuberculosis. Predicted postoperative lung function was calculated using SPECT/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 216 patients (men:women, 150:66; age, 67.9 ± 8.7 years), predicted postoperative FEV1% (ppoFEV1%) showed significant correlation with actual postoperative FEV1% ( r = 0.667; P < 0.001). Paired t test revealed that ppoFEV1% was significantly lower compared with actual postoperative FEV1% ( P < 0.001). The study identified video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98-7.69; P < 0.001) and higher percentage of resected volume (OR per 1% increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = 0.014) as significant predictors of postsurgical lung function improvement. Conversely, for the decline in lung function postsurgery, significant predictors included lower percentage of resected lung volume (OR per 1% increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98; P = 0.011), higher preoperative FEV1% (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.009), and the presence of tuberculosis (OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.48-18.15; P = 0.010). Additionally, in a subgroup of patients with borderline lung function, VATS was related with improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that in more than half of the patients, actual postsurgical lung function exceeded predicted values, particularly following VATS and with higher volume of lung resection. It also identifies lower resected lung volume, higher preoperative FEV1%, and tuberculosis as factors associated with a postsurgical decline in lung function. The study underscores the need for precise preoperative lung function assessment and tailored postoperative management, with particular attention to patients with relevant clinical factors. Future research should focus on validation of clinical factors and exploring tailored approaches to lung cancer surgery and recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e574-e579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺癌手术的疗效在很大程度上取决于术前肺功能储备,一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)是术前评估的关键因素。我们的研究调查了预测肺功能与术后长期实际肺功能之间的差异,重点关注影响这些结果的临床因素:这项回顾性观察研究涵盖了2015年至2021年间接受术前肺灌注SPECT/CT检查的肺癌患者。我们对术前和术后肺功能测试进行了评估,并考虑了手术类型、切除体积和包括肺结核在内的患者病史等因素。通过SPECT/CT成像计算预测的术后肺功能:216名患者(男女比例为150:66;年龄为67.9±8.7岁)的预测术后FEV1%(ppoFEV1%)与实际术后FEV1%有显著相关性(r = 0.667;P < 0.001)。配对 t 检验显示,ppoFEV1% 明显低于术后实际 FEV1%(P < 0.001)。研究发现,视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)(几率比[OR],3.90;95% 置信区间[CI],1.98-7.69;P <0.001)和较高的切除体积百分比(每增加 1%,几率比[OR],1.05;95% 置信区间[CI],1.01-1.09;P = 0.014)是术后肺功能改善的重要预测因素。相反,手术后肺功能下降的重要预测因素包括切除肺容积百分比较低(OR,每增加 1%,0.92;95% CI,0.86-0.98;P = 0.011)、术前 FEV1% 较高(OR,1.03;95% CI,1.01-1.07;P = 0.009)和存在肺结核(OR,5.19;95% CI,1.48-18.15;P = 0.010)。此外,在肺功能处于边缘的亚组患者中,VATS 与病情改善有关:我们的研究结果表明,半数以上患者手术后的实际肺功能超过了预测值,尤其是在 VATS 术后和肺切除量较大的情况下。研究还发现,较低的肺切除量、较高的术前 FEV1% 和肺结核是导致术后肺功能下降的相关因素。该研究强调,需要进行精确的术前肺功能评估和有针对性的术后管理,尤其要关注有相关临床因素的患者。未来的研究应侧重于临床因素的验证,并探索肺癌手术和康复的定制方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Factors Affecting Discrepancy Between Predicted and Long-term Actual Lung Function Following Surgery.

Purpose: Lung cancer surgery outcomes depend heavily on preoperative pulmonary reserve, with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) being a critical preoperative evaluation factor. Our study investigates the discrepancies between predicted and long-term actual postoperative lung function, focusing on clinical factors affecting these outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective observational study encompassed lung cancer patients who underwent preoperative lung perfusion SPECT/CT between 2015 and 2021. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests, considering factors such as surgery type, resected volume, and patient history including tuberculosis. Predicted postoperative lung function was calculated using SPECT/CT imaging.

Results: From 216 patients (men:women, 150:66; age, 67.9 ± 8.7 years), predicted postoperative FEV1% (ppoFEV1%) showed significant correlation with actual postoperative FEV1% ( r = 0.667; P < 0.001). Paired t test revealed that ppoFEV1% was significantly lower compared with actual postoperative FEV1% ( P < 0.001). The study identified video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98-7.69; P < 0.001) and higher percentage of resected volume (OR per 1% increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = 0.014) as significant predictors of postsurgical lung function improvement. Conversely, for the decline in lung function postsurgery, significant predictors included lower percentage of resected lung volume (OR per 1% increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98; P = 0.011), higher preoperative FEV1% (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.009), and the presence of tuberculosis (OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 1.48-18.15; P = 0.010). Additionally, in a subgroup of patients with borderline lung function, VATS was related with improvement.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that in more than half of the patients, actual postsurgical lung function exceeded predicted values, particularly following VATS and with higher volume of lung resection. It also identifies lower resected lung volume, higher preoperative FEV1%, and tuberculosis as factors associated with a postsurgical decline in lung function. The study underscores the need for precise preoperative lung function assessment and tailored postoperative management, with particular attention to patients with relevant clinical factors. Future research should focus on validation of clinical factors and exploring tailored approaches to lung cancer surgery and recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信