使用骨矿物质表观密度调整慢性疾病的骨矿物质表观密度:以地中海贫血症为例

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad-Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani, Hadis Gerami, Sara Shirazi, Mobina Ostadi, Bagher Larijani, Zohreh Hamidi
{"title":"使用骨矿物质表观密度调整慢性疾病的骨矿物质表观密度:以地中海贫血症为例","authors":"Mohammad-Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani, Hadis Gerami, Sara Shirazi, Mobina Ostadi, Bagher Larijani, Zohreh Hamidi","doi":"10.22088/cjim.15.3.494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low BMD is a common problem in major thalassaemia patient, but the use of DXA in chronic disease children with smaller bones, has some problems. Utilizing bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) helps in preventing this obstacle. Testing the usefulness of this method in resolving the effects of bone size on BMD by comparing the BMD and BMAD of our thalassemics with results of our healthy ones, is our goal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sample size was 110 cases with mean age of 9.6 ± 4.3 y/o and contained 73 males. Gauge of BMDs done by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Then BMAD was calculated. We did comparison of BMDs and BMADs results of thalassemic children with results of healthy Iranian pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean of femoral BMD and BMAD, spinal BMD and BMAD was 0.579±0.134 g/cm2, 0.162±0.096 g/cm3, 0.563±0.118 g/cm2 and 0.107±0.015, respectively. When results of 9-18 patients compared with BMDs and BMADs of normal children, BMD of femur and BMD and BMAD of spine of patients found significantly lower (P-values, 0.003, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). BMAD of femur of patients was not significantly different from normals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When bone mineral density of femur modifies by bone mineral apparent density formula, the remarkable difference between BMD of patients and normals; vanishes. Utilizing bone mineral apparent density helps in interpretation of femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry at least in thalassemic patients. As the results of vertebrae, after modification by calculating BMAD, remains significantly different, we cannot bring forward BMAD for mentioned aim in the spine of thalassemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9646,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"494-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using bone mineral apparent density for BMD adjustment in chronic diseases: Thalassemia an example.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad-Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani, Hadis Gerami, Sara Shirazi, Mobina Ostadi, Bagher Larijani, Zohreh Hamidi\",\"doi\":\"10.22088/cjim.15.3.494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low BMD is a common problem in major thalassaemia patient, but the use of DXA in chronic disease children with smaller bones, has some problems. Utilizing bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) helps in preventing this obstacle. Testing the usefulness of this method in resolving the effects of bone size on BMD by comparing the BMD and BMAD of our thalassemics with results of our healthy ones, is our goal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sample size was 110 cases with mean age of 9.6 ± 4.3 y/o and contained 73 males. Gauge of BMDs done by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Then BMAD was calculated. We did comparison of BMDs and BMADs results of thalassemic children with results of healthy Iranian pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean of femoral BMD and BMAD, spinal BMD and BMAD was 0.579±0.134 g/cm2, 0.162±0.096 g/cm3, 0.563±0.118 g/cm2 and 0.107±0.015, respectively. When results of 9-18 patients compared with BMDs and BMADs of normal children, BMD of femur and BMD and BMAD of spine of patients found significantly lower (P-values, 0.003, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). BMAD of femur of patients was not significantly different from normals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When bone mineral density of femur modifies by bone mineral apparent density formula, the remarkable difference between BMD of patients and normals; vanishes. Utilizing bone mineral apparent density helps in interpretation of femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry at least in thalassemic patients. As the results of vertebrae, after modification by calculating BMAD, remains significantly different, we cannot bring forward BMAD for mentioned aim in the spine of thalassemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"494-498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.15.3.494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.15.3.494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低骨矿物质密度是重型地中海贫血患者的常见问题,但在骨骼较小的慢性病患儿中使用 DXA 存在一些问题。利用骨矿物质表观密度(BMAD)有助于避免这一障碍。我们的目标是通过比较地中海贫血患儿的 BMD 和 BMAD 与健康患儿的结果,测试这种方法在解决骨骼大小对 BMD 的影响方面的实用性:样本量为 110 例,平均年龄为 9.6 ± 4.3 岁/o,其中男性 73 例。通过双 X 射线吸收测量法测量 BMD。然后计算 BMAD。我们将地中海贫血儿童的 BMD 和 BMAD 结果与伊朗健康儿童的结果进行了比较:结果:股骨 BMD 和 BMAD、脊柱 BMD 和 BMAD 的平均值分别为 0.579±0.134 g/cm2、0.162±0.096 g/cm3、0.563±0.118 g/cm2 和 0.107±0.015。将 9-18 例患者的结果与正常儿童的 BMD 和 BMAD 进行比较,发现患者的股骨 BMD、脊柱 BMD 和 BMAD 均明显偏低(P 值为 0.003,结论):用骨矿物质表观密度公式修正股骨的骨矿物质密度后,患者与正常人的骨矿物质密度之间的显著差异就会消失。至少在地中海贫血症患者中,利用骨矿物质表观密度有助于解释股骨双 X 射线吸收测量法。由于通过计算骨矿物质表观密度对椎骨进行修正后的结果仍存在显著差异,因此我们无法将骨矿物质表观密度用于地中海贫血症患者的脊柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using bone mineral apparent density for BMD adjustment in chronic diseases: Thalassemia an example.

Background: Low BMD is a common problem in major thalassaemia patient, but the use of DXA in chronic disease children with smaller bones, has some problems. Utilizing bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) helps in preventing this obstacle. Testing the usefulness of this method in resolving the effects of bone size on BMD by comparing the BMD and BMAD of our thalassemics with results of our healthy ones, is our goal.

Methods: Sample size was 110 cases with mean age of 9.6 ± 4.3 y/o and contained 73 males. Gauge of BMDs done by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Then BMAD was calculated. We did comparison of BMDs and BMADs results of thalassemic children with results of healthy Iranian pediatrics.

Results: Mean of femoral BMD and BMAD, spinal BMD and BMAD was 0.579±0.134 g/cm2, 0.162±0.096 g/cm3, 0.563±0.118 g/cm2 and 0.107±0.015, respectively. When results of 9-18 patients compared with BMDs and BMADs of normal children, BMD of femur and BMD and BMAD of spine of patients found significantly lower (P-values, 0.003, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). BMAD of femur of patients was not significantly different from normals.

Conclusion: When bone mineral density of femur modifies by bone mineral apparent density formula, the remarkable difference between BMD of patients and normals; vanishes. Utilizing bone mineral apparent density helps in interpretation of femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry at least in thalassemic patients. As the results of vertebrae, after modification by calculating BMAD, remains significantly different, we cannot bring forward BMAD for mentioned aim in the spine of thalassemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信