冠状动脉钙和定量冠状动脉斑块在预测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病方面的比较:CLARIFY研究的分组分析。

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart International Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2024.18.1.7
Venkat Sanjay Manubolu, Suraj Dahal, Suvasini Lakshmanan, Tami Crabtree, April Kinninger, Ahmed M Shafter, Jairo Aldana Bitar, Dhiran Verghese, Luay Alalawi, Chris Dailing, James P Earls, Matthew J Budoff
{"title":"冠状动脉钙和定量冠状动脉斑块在预测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病方面的比较:CLARIFY研究的分组分析。","authors":"Venkat Sanjay Manubolu, Suraj Dahal, Suvasini Lakshmanan, Tami Crabtree, April Kinninger, Ahmed M Shafter, Jairo Aldana Bitar, Dhiran Verghese, Luay Alalawi, Chris Dailing, James P Earls, Matthew J Budoff","doi":"10.17925/HI.2024.18.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor of mortality. However, the relationship between CAC and quantitative calcified plaque volume (CPV), which is measured on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is not well understood. Furthermore, there is limited evidence evaluating the difference between CAC versus CPV and CAC versus total plaque volume (TPV) in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). <b>Methods:</b> This study included 147 subjects from the CLARIFY registry, a multicentered study of patients undergoing assessment using CCTA and CAC score as part of acute and stable chest pain evaluation. Automated software service (Cleerly.Inc, Denver, CO, USA) was used to evaluate the degree of vessel stenosis and plaque quantification on CCTA. CAC was measured using the standard Agatston method. Spearman correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of CAC, CPV and TPV in detecting obstructive CAD. <b>Results:</b> Results demonstrated a very strong positive correlation between CAC and CPV (r=0.76, p=0.0001) and strong correlation between CAC and TPV (r=0.72, p<0.001) at per-patient level analysis. At per-patient level analysis, the sensitivity of CAC (68%) is lower than CPV (77%) in predicting >50% stenosis, but negative predictive value is comparable. However, the sensitivity of TPV is higher compared with CAC in predicting >50% stenosis, and the negative predictive value of TPV is also higher. <b>Conclusion:</b> CPV and TPV are more sensitive in predicting the severity of obstructive CAD compared with the CAC score. However, the negative predictive value of CAC is comparable to CPV, but is lower than TPV. This study elucidates the relationship between CAC and quantitative plaque types, and especially emphasizes the differences between CAC and CPV which are two distinct plaque measurement techniques that are utilized in predicting obstructive CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"18 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Coronary Artery Calcium and Quantitative Coronary Plaque in Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Subgroup Analysis of the CLARIFY Study.\",\"authors\":\"Venkat Sanjay Manubolu, Suraj Dahal, Suvasini Lakshmanan, Tami Crabtree, April Kinninger, Ahmed M Shafter, Jairo Aldana Bitar, Dhiran Verghese, Luay Alalawi, Chris Dailing, James P Earls, Matthew J Budoff\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/HI.2024.18.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor of mortality. However, the relationship between CAC and quantitative calcified plaque volume (CPV), which is measured on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is not well understood. Furthermore, there is limited evidence evaluating the difference between CAC versus CPV and CAC versus total plaque volume (TPV) in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). <b>Methods:</b> This study included 147 subjects from the CLARIFY registry, a multicentered study of patients undergoing assessment using CCTA and CAC score as part of acute and stable chest pain evaluation. Automated software service (Cleerly.Inc, Denver, CO, USA) was used to evaluate the degree of vessel stenosis and plaque quantification on CCTA. CAC was measured using the standard Agatston method. Spearman correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of CAC, CPV and TPV in detecting obstructive CAD. <b>Results:</b> Results demonstrated a very strong positive correlation between CAC and CPV (r=0.76, p=0.0001) and strong correlation between CAC and TPV (r=0.72, p<0.001) at per-patient level analysis. At per-patient level analysis, the sensitivity of CAC (68%) is lower than CPV (77%) in predicting >50% stenosis, but negative predictive value is comparable. However, the sensitivity of TPV is higher compared with CAC in predicting >50% stenosis, and the negative predictive value of TPV is also higher. <b>Conclusion:</b> CPV and TPV are more sensitive in predicting the severity of obstructive CAD compared with the CAC score. However, the negative predictive value of CAC is comparable to CPV, but is lower than TPV. This study elucidates the relationship between CAC and quantitative plaque types, and especially emphasizes the differences between CAC and CPV which are two distinct plaque measurement techniques that are utilized in predicting obstructive CAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart International\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239135/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2024.18.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2024.18.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿加特斯通冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分是预测死亡率的有力指标。然而,CAC 与冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)测量的定量钙化斑块体积(CPV)之间的关系尚不十分清楚。此外,在预测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)方面,评估 CAC 与 CPV 和 CAC 与斑块总体积(TPV)之间差异的证据也很有限。研究方法这项多中心研究使用 CCTA 和 CAC 评分对急性和稳定型胸痛患者进行评估。自动软件服务(Cleerly.Inc,美国科罗拉多州丹佛市)用于评估 CCTA 的血管狭窄程度和斑块量化。CAC 采用标准的 Agatston 方法进行测量。对 CAC、CPV 和 TPV 检测阻塞性 CAD 的诊断能力进行了斯皮尔曼相关性和接收者操作特征曲线分析。结果显示结果表明,CAC 和 CPV 之间有很强的正相关性(r=0.76,p=0.0001),CAC 和 TPV 之间也有很强的相关性(r=0.72,p50% 狭窄,但阴性预测值相当。然而,与 CAC 相比,TPV 预测 >50% 狭窄的敏感性更高,阴性预测值也更高。结论:与 CAC 评分相比,CPV 和 TPV 预测阻塞性 CAD 严重程度的敏感性更高。然而,CAC 的阴性预测值与 CPV 相当,但低于 TPV。这项研究阐明了 CAC 和定量斑块类型之间的关系,尤其强调了 CAC 和 CPV 这两种用于预测阻塞性 CAD 的不同斑块测量技术之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Coronary Artery Calcium and Quantitative Coronary Plaque in Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Subgroup Analysis of the CLARIFY Study.

Background: Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor of mortality. However, the relationship between CAC and quantitative calcified plaque volume (CPV), which is measured on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is not well understood. Furthermore, there is limited evidence evaluating the difference between CAC versus CPV and CAC versus total plaque volume (TPV) in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: This study included 147 subjects from the CLARIFY registry, a multicentered study of patients undergoing assessment using CCTA and CAC score as part of acute and stable chest pain evaluation. Automated software service (Cleerly.Inc, Denver, CO, USA) was used to evaluate the degree of vessel stenosis and plaque quantification on CCTA. CAC was measured using the standard Agatston method. Spearman correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of CAC, CPV and TPV in detecting obstructive CAD. Results: Results demonstrated a very strong positive correlation between CAC and CPV (r=0.76, p=0.0001) and strong correlation between CAC and TPV (r=0.72, p<0.001) at per-patient level analysis. At per-patient level analysis, the sensitivity of CAC (68%) is lower than CPV (77%) in predicting >50% stenosis, but negative predictive value is comparable. However, the sensitivity of TPV is higher compared with CAC in predicting >50% stenosis, and the negative predictive value of TPV is also higher. Conclusion: CPV and TPV are more sensitive in predicting the severity of obstructive CAD compared with the CAC score. However, the negative predictive value of CAC is comparable to CPV, but is lower than TPV. This study elucidates the relationship between CAC and quantitative plaque types, and especially emphasizes the differences between CAC and CPV which are two distinct plaque measurement techniques that are utilized in predicting obstructive CAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信