刺激持续时间对人类耳蜗调谐估计值的影响

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
David López-Ramos , Almudena Eustaquio-Martín , Luis E. López-Bascuas , Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda
{"title":"刺激持续时间对人类耳蜗调谐估计值的影响","authors":"David López-Ramos ,&nbsp;Almudena Eustaquio-Martín ,&nbsp;Luis E. López-Bascuas ,&nbsp;Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Auditory masking methods originally employed to assess behavioral frequency selectivity have evolved over the years to infer cochlear tuning. Behavioral forward masking thresholds for spectrally notched noise maskers and a fixed, low-level probe tone provide accurate estimates of cochlear tuning. Here, we use this method to investigate the effect of stimulus duration on human cochlear tuning at 500 Hz and 4 kHz. Probes were 20-ms sinusoids at 10 dB sensation level. Maskers were noises with a spectral notch symmetrically and asymmetrically placed around the probe frequency. For seven participants with normal hearing, masker levels at masking threshold were measured in forward masking for various notch widths and for masker durations of 30 and 400 ms. Measurements were fitted assuming rounded exponential filter shapes and the power spectrum model of masking, and equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) were inferred from the fits. At 4 kHz, masker thresholds were higher for the shorter maskers but ERBs were not significantly different for the two masker durations (ERB<sub>30ms</sub>=294 Hz vs. ERB<sub>400ms</sub>=277 Hz). At 500 Hz, by contrast, notched-noise curves were shallower for the 30-ms than the 400-ms masker, and ERBs were significantly broader for the shorter masker (ERB<sub>30ms</sub>=126 Hz vs. ERB<sub>400ms</sub>=55 Hz). We discuss possible factors that may underlay the duration effect at low frequencies and argue that it may not be possible to fully control for those factors. We conclude that tuning estimates are not affected by maker duration at high frequencies but should be measured and interpreted with caution at low frequencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"451 ","pages":"Article 109080"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001333/pdfft?md5=2689f29d400d2a31f08610d8469d8778&pid=1-s2.0-S0378595524001333-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of stimulus duration on estimates of human cochlear tuning\",\"authors\":\"David López-Ramos ,&nbsp;Almudena Eustaquio-Martín ,&nbsp;Luis E. López-Bascuas ,&nbsp;Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Auditory masking methods originally employed to assess behavioral frequency selectivity have evolved over the years to infer cochlear tuning. Behavioral forward masking thresholds for spectrally notched noise maskers and a fixed, low-level probe tone provide accurate estimates of cochlear tuning. Here, we use this method to investigate the effect of stimulus duration on human cochlear tuning at 500 Hz and 4 kHz. Probes were 20-ms sinusoids at 10 dB sensation level. Maskers were noises with a spectral notch symmetrically and asymmetrically placed around the probe frequency. For seven participants with normal hearing, masker levels at masking threshold were measured in forward masking for various notch widths and for masker durations of 30 and 400 ms. Measurements were fitted assuming rounded exponential filter shapes and the power spectrum model of masking, and equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) were inferred from the fits. At 4 kHz, masker thresholds were higher for the shorter maskers but ERBs were not significantly different for the two masker durations (ERB<sub>30ms</sub>=294 Hz vs. ERB<sub>400ms</sub>=277 Hz). At 500 Hz, by contrast, notched-noise curves were shallower for the 30-ms than the 400-ms masker, and ERBs were significantly broader for the shorter masker (ERB<sub>30ms</sub>=126 Hz vs. ERB<sub>400ms</sub>=55 Hz). We discuss possible factors that may underlay the duration effect at low frequencies and argue that it may not be possible to fully control for those factors. We conclude that tuning estimates are not affected by maker duration at high frequencies but should be measured and interpreted with caution at low frequencies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"451 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001333/pdfft?md5=2689f29d400d2a31f08610d8469d8778&pid=1-s2.0-S0378595524001333-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最初用于评估行为频率选择性的听觉掩蔽方法经过多年的发展,已经可以用来推断耳蜗调谐。对频谱缺口噪声掩蔽器和固定的低水平探测音的行为前向掩蔽阈值可以准确估计耳蜗调谐。在这里,我们使用这种方法来研究刺激持续时间对人类耳蜗在 500 Hz 和 4 kHz 频率上的调谐的影响。探头为 20 毫秒的正弦波,感度为 10 分贝。掩蔽物是在探头频率周围对称和不对称放置的带有频谱缺口的噪音。对 7 名听力正常的参与者进行了前向掩蔽测量,测量了不同缺口宽度和掩蔽持续时间(30 和 400 毫秒)下掩蔽阈值的掩蔽水平。测量结果被假定为圆形指数滤波器形状和掩蔽的功率谱模型,并根据拟合结果推断出等效矩形带宽(ERB)。在 4 kHz 时,较短掩蔽器的掩蔽阈值较高,但两种掩蔽器持续时间的等效矩形带宽没有显著差异(ERB30ms=294 Hz vs. ERB400ms=277 Hz)。相比之下,在 500 Hz 时,30 毫秒掩蔽器的缺口噪声曲线比 400 毫秒掩蔽器的缺口噪声曲线浅,而较短掩蔽器的 ERB 明显较宽(ERB30 毫秒=126 Hz vs. ERB400 毫秒=55 Hz)。我们讨论了可能导致低频时长效应的因素,并认为不可能完全控制这些因素。我们的结论是,调谐估计值在高频率时不受制音器持续时间的影响,但在低频时应谨慎测量和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of stimulus duration on estimates of human cochlear tuning

Auditory masking methods originally employed to assess behavioral frequency selectivity have evolved over the years to infer cochlear tuning. Behavioral forward masking thresholds for spectrally notched noise maskers and a fixed, low-level probe tone provide accurate estimates of cochlear tuning. Here, we use this method to investigate the effect of stimulus duration on human cochlear tuning at 500 Hz and 4 kHz. Probes were 20-ms sinusoids at 10 dB sensation level. Maskers were noises with a spectral notch symmetrically and asymmetrically placed around the probe frequency. For seven participants with normal hearing, masker levels at masking threshold were measured in forward masking for various notch widths and for masker durations of 30 and 400 ms. Measurements were fitted assuming rounded exponential filter shapes and the power spectrum model of masking, and equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) were inferred from the fits. At 4 kHz, masker thresholds were higher for the shorter maskers but ERBs were not significantly different for the two masker durations (ERB30ms=294 Hz vs. ERB400ms=277 Hz). At 500 Hz, by contrast, notched-noise curves were shallower for the 30-ms than the 400-ms masker, and ERBs were significantly broader for the shorter masker (ERB30ms=126 Hz vs. ERB400ms=55 Hz). We discuss possible factors that may underlay the duration effect at low frequencies and argue that it may not be possible to fully control for those factors. We conclude that tuning estimates are not affected by maker duration at high frequencies but should be measured and interpreted with caution at low frequencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信