经济和金融一体化、资本管制和风险分担

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Economica Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1111/ecca.12545
Michael Donadelli, Ivan Gufler
{"title":"经济和金融一体化、资本管制和风险分担","authors":"Michael Donadelli,&nbsp;Ivan Gufler","doi":"10.1111/ecca.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyse economic (EI) and financial (FI) integration, and their effects on international consumption risk sharing (RS) across 40 countries, including 21 developed (DEV) and 19 emerging (EM) markets, from 1995 to 2019. Utilizing the metric for EI and FI of Akbari <i>et al</i>. (2020, <i>Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis</i>, <b>55</b>, 2270–303), and various RS proxies, we find that increasing EI reduces RS in EM, while FI enhances it. Conversely, there is no evidence that EI or FI influences RS in DEV, contradicting theoretical predictions from international business cycle models. These results remain robust when controlling for trade and financial openness and capital flow restrictions. Additionally, we investigate the direct influence of capital controls on market integration. Relaxing equity inflow controls significantly enhances market integration, specifically boosting EI in DEV, and FI in EM. In contrast, equity outflow restrictions and controls on other asset categories do not significantly impact market integration. Our findings challenge the idea that simply removing legal restrictions on international capital flows is sufficient or necessary to achieve greater market integration and improved RS. This underscores the perspective that adjustments in capital controls alone may not ensure macro-financial stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48040,"journal":{"name":"Economica","volume":"91 364","pages":"1482-1520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic and financial integration, capital controls, and risk sharing\",\"authors\":\"Michael Donadelli,&nbsp;Ivan Gufler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecca.12545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We analyse economic (EI) and financial (FI) integration, and their effects on international consumption risk sharing (RS) across 40 countries, including 21 developed (DEV) and 19 emerging (EM) markets, from 1995 to 2019. Utilizing the metric for EI and FI of Akbari <i>et al</i>. (2020, <i>Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis</i>, <b>55</b>, 2270–303), and various RS proxies, we find that increasing EI reduces RS in EM, while FI enhances it. Conversely, there is no evidence that EI or FI influences RS in DEV, contradicting theoretical predictions from international business cycle models. These results remain robust when controlling for trade and financial openness and capital flow restrictions. Additionally, we investigate the direct influence of capital controls on market integration. Relaxing equity inflow controls significantly enhances market integration, specifically boosting EI in DEV, and FI in EM. In contrast, equity outflow restrictions and controls on other asset categories do not significantly impact market integration. Our findings challenge the idea that simply removing legal restrictions on international capital flows is sufficient or necessary to achieve greater market integration and improved RS. This underscores the perspective that adjustments in capital controls alone may not ensure macro-financial stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economica\",\"volume\":\"91 364\",\"pages\":\"1482-1520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.12545\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.12545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了 1995 至 2019 年间 40 个国家的经济(EI)和金融(FI)一体化及其对国际消费风险分担(RS)的影响,其中包括 21 个发达国家(DEV)和 19 个新兴市场(EM)。利用 Akbari 等人(2020 年,《金融与定量分析期刊》,55,2270-303)的 EI 和 FI 指标以及各种 RS 代用指标,我们发现,EI 的增加会降低新兴市场的 RS,而 FI 则会增强 RS。相反,没有证据表明 EI 或 FI 会影响发展中经济体的 RS,这与国际商业周期模型的理论预测相矛盾。在控制贸易和金融开放度以及资本流动限制的情况下,这些结果仍然是稳健的。此外,我们还研究了资本管制对市场一体化的直接影响。放宽股票流入管制会明显促进市场一体化,特别是促进发展中经济体的 EI 和新兴经济体的 FI。相比之下,股票流出限制和对其他资产类别的管制对市场一体化的影响不大。我们的研究结果对以下观点提出了质疑,即仅仅取消对国际资本流动的法律限制就足以或必须实现更大程度的市场一体化和改善 RS。这突出表明,仅调整资本管制可能无法确保宏观金融稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic and financial integration, capital controls, and risk sharing

We analyse economic (EI) and financial (FI) integration, and their effects on international consumption risk sharing (RS) across 40 countries, including 21 developed (DEV) and 19 emerging (EM) markets, from 1995 to 2019. Utilizing the metric for EI and FI of Akbari et al. (2020, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55, 2270–303), and various RS proxies, we find that increasing EI reduces RS in EM, while FI enhances it. Conversely, there is no evidence that EI or FI influences RS in DEV, contradicting theoretical predictions from international business cycle models. These results remain robust when controlling for trade and financial openness and capital flow restrictions. Additionally, we investigate the direct influence of capital controls on market integration. Relaxing equity inflow controls significantly enhances market integration, specifically boosting EI in DEV, and FI in EM. In contrast, equity outflow restrictions and controls on other asset categories do not significantly impact market integration. Our findings challenge the idea that simply removing legal restrictions on international capital flows is sufficient or necessary to achieve greater market integration and improved RS. This underscores the perspective that adjustments in capital controls alone may not ensure macro-financial stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economica
Economica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Economica is an international journal devoted to research in all branches of economics. Theoretical and empirical articles are welcome from all parts of the international research community. Economica is a leading economics journal, appearing high in the published citation rankings. In addition to the main papers which make up each issue, there is an extensive review section, covering a wide range of recently published titles at all levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信