慢性疼痛患者自我体验问卷-2 的初步验证

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lin Yu, Kitty Kioskli, Lance M. McCracken
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者自我体验问卷-2 的初步验证","authors":"Lin Yu, Kitty Kioskli, Lance M. McCracken","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10500-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The struggle with sense of self has a fundamental impact on health and wellbeing in people with chronic pain. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) particularly includes a process related to sense of self, called self-as-context (SAC). A measure of SAC, called the Self Experiences Questionnaire-8 (SEQ-8) has been developed in people with chronic pain. A brief version of the SEQ can facilitate more efficient assessment in clinical settings, and further research using intensive assessment to produce situation and time-sensitive information on SAC. The aim of the study was to establish a two-item version of the SEQ.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study used secondary analyses of data from 453 people with chronic pain.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The newly validated SEQ-2 demonstrated acceptable reliability, Cronbach’s α = 0.77, and performed well in assessing SAC, with 88.6% of the variance in the SEQ-8 explained by the SEQ-2. The construct validity of the SEQ-2 was supported by its associations with other theoretically-specified processes, <i>r</i> = .25-0.51, <i>p</i> &lt; .001. and measures of functioning, |<i>r</i>|=0.18-0.40, <i>p</i> &lt; .001. The incremental validity of the SEQ-2 was relatively limited, |<i>β</i>|=0.08-0.34. Conclusions: The SEQ-2 appears to be an acceptable measure of SAC. The brief version of the SEQ can facilitate the application of individualised research methods and personalised pain treatments, informed by intensive assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Validation of the Self Experiences Questionnaire-2 in People with Chronic Pain\",\"authors\":\"Lin Yu, Kitty Kioskli, Lance M. McCracken\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10608-024-10500-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>The struggle with sense of self has a fundamental impact on health and wellbeing in people with chronic pain. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) particularly includes a process related to sense of self, called self-as-context (SAC). A measure of SAC, called the Self Experiences Questionnaire-8 (SEQ-8) has been developed in people with chronic pain. A brief version of the SEQ can facilitate more efficient assessment in clinical settings, and further research using intensive assessment to produce situation and time-sensitive information on SAC. The aim of the study was to establish a two-item version of the SEQ.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This study used secondary analyses of data from 453 people with chronic pain.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The newly validated SEQ-2 demonstrated acceptable reliability, Cronbach’s α = 0.77, and performed well in assessing SAC, with 88.6% of the variance in the SEQ-8 explained by the SEQ-2. The construct validity of the SEQ-2 was supported by its associations with other theoretically-specified processes, <i>r</i> = .25-0.51, <i>p</i> &lt; .001. and measures of functioning, |<i>r</i>|=0.18-0.40, <i>p</i> &lt; .001. The incremental validity of the SEQ-2 was relatively limited, |<i>β</i>|=0.08-0.34. Conclusions: The SEQ-2 appears to be an acceptable measure of SAC. The brief version of the SEQ can facilitate the application of individualised research methods and personalised pain treatments, informed by intensive assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10500-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10500-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的与自我意识的斗争对慢性疼痛患者的健康和幸福有着根本性的影响。接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)特别包括一个与自我意识有关的过程,称为自我即背景(SAC)。针对慢性疼痛患者开发了一种名为 "自我体验问卷-8"(SEQ-8)的 SAC 测量方法。简短版的自我体验问卷有助于在临床环境中进行更有效的评估,并有助于利用强化评估进行进一步的研究,以获得有关 SAC 的情况和时效性信息。结果新验证的SEQ-2显示了可接受的可靠性(Cronbach's α = 0.77),在评估SAC方面表现良好,SEQ-8中88.6%的方差由SEQ-2解释。SEQ-2与其他理论指定过程(r=0.25-0.51,p <.001)和功能测量(r=0.18-0.40,p <.001)之间的关联支持了SEQ-2的建构效度。SEQ-2的增量有效性相对有限,|β|=0.08-0.34。结论:SEQ-2似乎是一种可接受的SAC测量方法。简短版 SEQ 可以促进个性化研究方法的应用,并在强化评估的基础上提供个性化疼痛治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Initial Validation of the Self Experiences Questionnaire-2 in People with Chronic Pain

Initial Validation of the Self Experiences Questionnaire-2 in People with Chronic Pain

Purpose

The struggle with sense of self has a fundamental impact on health and wellbeing in people with chronic pain. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) particularly includes a process related to sense of self, called self-as-context (SAC). A measure of SAC, called the Self Experiences Questionnaire-8 (SEQ-8) has been developed in people with chronic pain. A brief version of the SEQ can facilitate more efficient assessment in clinical settings, and further research using intensive assessment to produce situation and time-sensitive information on SAC. The aim of the study was to establish a two-item version of the SEQ.

Methods

This study used secondary analyses of data from 453 people with chronic pain.

Results

The newly validated SEQ-2 demonstrated acceptable reliability, Cronbach’s α = 0.77, and performed well in assessing SAC, with 88.6% of the variance in the SEQ-8 explained by the SEQ-2. The construct validity of the SEQ-2 was supported by its associations with other theoretically-specified processes, r = .25-0.51, p < .001. and measures of functioning, |r|=0.18-0.40, p < .001. The incremental validity of the SEQ-2 was relatively limited, |β|=0.08-0.34. Conclusions: The SEQ-2 appears to be an acceptable measure of SAC. The brief version of the SEQ can facilitate the application of individualised research methods and personalised pain treatments, informed by intensive assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信