虹吸孔形态计量学能否用于潮间带软壳蛤(Mya arenaria)的种群评估?

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jeff C. Clements, Sarah Harrison, Jillian Hunt, Isabelle Brennan, Heather L. Hunt, Rémi Sonier
{"title":"虹吸孔形态计量学能否用于潮间带软壳蛤(Mya arenaria)的种群评估?","authors":"Jeff C. Clements, Sarah Harrison, Jillian Hunt, Isabelle Brennan, Heather L. Hunt, Rémi Sonier","doi":"10.1007/s12237-024-01386-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measuring infaunal population dynamics relies on destructive sampling that disturbs sediments and removes animals from their habitat. Establishing effective, non-invasive sampling methods for monitoring infaunal populations can reduce the impact of scientific sampling and facilitate efficient population assessments. Using intertidal soft-shell clams (<i>Mya arenaria</i> L.) in eastern Canada, we explored whether population density and size structure could be estimated from visible siphon holes. Across four sites with varying sediment characteristics and infaunal species assemblages, we predicted the presence of <i>M. arenaria</i> with 78–100% accuracy by visually assessing siphon holes. Smaller holes (&lt; 7.5 mm) were more likely to be misidentified. Siphon hole count was a strong predictor of actual clam count and biomass at most sites, except the site with wet muddy sediment and high densities of other infaunal species. Siphon hole length was positively related to clam shell length and wet weight at all sites; however, relationships typically had low <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values (&lt; 0.35). Ultimately, visual assessments of intertidal siphon holes can be effective for estimating <i>M. arenaria</i> densities and size structure in some habitats. Testing the application of this method to other habitats and species is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11921,"journal":{"name":"Estuaries and Coasts","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Siphon Hole Morphometrics Be Used for Population Assessments of Intertidal Soft-Shell Clams, Mya arenaria?\",\"authors\":\"Jeff C. Clements, Sarah Harrison, Jillian Hunt, Isabelle Brennan, Heather L. Hunt, Rémi Sonier\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12237-024-01386-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Measuring infaunal population dynamics relies on destructive sampling that disturbs sediments and removes animals from their habitat. Establishing effective, non-invasive sampling methods for monitoring infaunal populations can reduce the impact of scientific sampling and facilitate efficient population assessments. Using intertidal soft-shell clams (<i>Mya arenaria</i> L.) in eastern Canada, we explored whether population density and size structure could be estimated from visible siphon holes. Across four sites with varying sediment characteristics and infaunal species assemblages, we predicted the presence of <i>M. arenaria</i> with 78–100% accuracy by visually assessing siphon holes. Smaller holes (&lt; 7.5 mm) were more likely to be misidentified. Siphon hole count was a strong predictor of actual clam count and biomass at most sites, except the site with wet muddy sediment and high densities of other infaunal species. Siphon hole length was positively related to clam shell length and wet weight at all sites; however, relationships typically had low <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values (&lt; 0.35). Ultimately, visual assessments of intertidal siphon holes can be effective for estimating <i>M. arenaria</i> densities and size structure in some habitats. Testing the application of this method to other habitats and species is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estuaries and Coasts\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estuaries and Coasts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01386-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuaries and Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01386-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对底栖生物种群动态的测量依赖于破坏性取样,这种取样会扰乱沉积物并将动物从其栖息地移走。建立有效的非侵入性取样方法来监测底栖生物种群,可以减少科学取样的影响,促进有效的种群评估。我们利用加拿大东部的潮间带软壳蛤(Mya arenaria L.),探讨了是否可以通过可见的虹吸孔来估计种群密度和大小结构。在四个具有不同沉积物特征和底栖生物物种组合的地点,我们通过目测虹吸孔来预测软壳蛤(Mya arenaria)的存在,准确率为 78-100%。较小的虹吸孔(7.5 毫米)更容易被误认。在大多数地点,虹吸孔数都能很好地预测实际的蛤类数量和生物量,但潮湿泥质沉积物和其他底栖生物密度较高的地点除外。在所有地点,虹吸孔长度与蛤壳长度和湿重呈正相关;但是,相关关系的 R2 值通常较低(0.35)。最终,对潮间带虹吸孔的目测评估可以有效地估算某些生境中的M. arenaria密度和大小结构。有必要测试这种方法在其他生境和物种中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can Siphon Hole Morphometrics Be Used for Population Assessments of Intertidal Soft-Shell Clams, Mya arenaria?

Can Siphon Hole Morphometrics Be Used for Population Assessments of Intertidal Soft-Shell Clams, Mya arenaria?

Measuring infaunal population dynamics relies on destructive sampling that disturbs sediments and removes animals from their habitat. Establishing effective, non-invasive sampling methods for monitoring infaunal populations can reduce the impact of scientific sampling and facilitate efficient population assessments. Using intertidal soft-shell clams (Mya arenaria L.) in eastern Canada, we explored whether population density and size structure could be estimated from visible siphon holes. Across four sites with varying sediment characteristics and infaunal species assemblages, we predicted the presence of M. arenaria with 78–100% accuracy by visually assessing siphon holes. Smaller holes (< 7.5 mm) were more likely to be misidentified. Siphon hole count was a strong predictor of actual clam count and biomass at most sites, except the site with wet muddy sediment and high densities of other infaunal species. Siphon hole length was positively related to clam shell length and wet weight at all sites; however, relationships typically had low R2 values (< 0.35). Ultimately, visual assessments of intertidal siphon holes can be effective for estimating M. arenaria densities and size structure in some habitats. Testing the application of this method to other habitats and species is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estuaries and Coasts
Estuaries and Coasts 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Estuaries and Coasts is the journal of the Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF). Begun in 1977 as Chesapeake Science, the journal has gradually expanded its scope and circulation. Today, the journal publishes scholarly manuscripts on estuarine and near coastal ecosystems at the interface between the land and the sea where there are tidal fluctuations or sea water is diluted by fresh water. The interface is broadly defined to include estuaries and nearshore coastal waters including lagoons, wetlands, tidal fresh water, shores and beaches, but not the continental shelf. The journal covers research on physical, chemical, geological or biological processes, as well as applications to management of estuaries and coasts. The journal publishes original research findings, reviews and perspectives, techniques, comments, and management applications. Estuaries and Coasts will consider properly carried out studies that present inconclusive findings or document a failed replication of previously published work. Submissions that are primarily descriptive, strongly place-based, or only report on development of models or new methods without detailing their applications fall outside the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信