医疗保健联合学习的隐私保护

IF 6.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sarthak Pati, Sourav Kumar, Amokh Varma, Brandon Edwards, Charles Lu, Liangqiong Qu, Justin J. Wang, Anantharaman Lakshminarayanan, Shih-han Wang, Micah J. Sheller, Ken Chang, Praveer Singh, Daniel L. Rubin, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Spyridon Bakas
{"title":"医疗保健联合学习的隐私保护","authors":"Sarthak Pati, Sourav Kumar, Amokh Varma, Brandon Edwards, Charles Lu, Liangqiong Qu, Justin J. Wang, Anantharaman Lakshminarayanan, Shih-han Wang, Micah J. Sheller, Ken Chang, Praveer Singh, Daniel L. Rubin, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Spyridon Bakas","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2024.100974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential to improve health care by leveraging data to build models that can inform clinical workflows. However, access to large quantities of diverse data is needed to develop robust generalizable models. Data sharing across institutions is not always feasible due to legal, security, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) allows for multi-institutional training of AI models, obviating data sharing, albeit with different security and privacy concerns. Specifically, insights exchanged during FL can leak information about institutional data. In addition, FL can introduce issues when there is limited trust among the entities performing the compute. With the growing adoption of FL in health care, it is imperative to elucidate the potential risks. We thus summarize privacy-preserving FL literature in this work with special regard to health care. We draw attention to threats and review mitigation approaches. We anticipate this review to become a health-care researcher’s guide to security and privacy in FL.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy preservation for federated learning in health care\",\"authors\":\"Sarthak Pati, Sourav Kumar, Amokh Varma, Brandon Edwards, Charles Lu, Liangqiong Qu, Justin J. Wang, Anantharaman Lakshminarayanan, Shih-han Wang, Micah J. Sheller, Ken Chang, Praveer Singh, Daniel L. Rubin, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Spyridon Bakas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.patter.2024.100974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential to improve health care by leveraging data to build models that can inform clinical workflows. However, access to large quantities of diverse data is needed to develop robust generalizable models. Data sharing across institutions is not always feasible due to legal, security, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) allows for multi-institutional training of AI models, obviating data sharing, albeit with different security and privacy concerns. Specifically, insights exchanged during FL can leak information about institutional data. In addition, FL can introduce issues when there is limited trust among the entities performing the compute. With the growing adoption of FL in health care, it is imperative to elucidate the potential risks. We thus summarize privacy-preserving FL literature in this work with special regard to health care. We draw attention to threats and review mitigation approaches. We anticipate this review to become a health-care researcher’s guide to security and privacy in FL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patterns\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patterns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)通过利用数据建立模型,为临床工作流程提供信息,从而显示出改善医疗保健的潜力。然而,要开发强大的通用模型,需要获取大量不同的数据。出于法律、安全和隐私方面的考虑,跨机构共享数据并不总是可行的。联合学习(FL)允许对人工智能模型进行多机构训练,从而避免了数据共享,但却存在不同的安全和隐私问题。具体来说,在联合学习过程中交换的见解可能会泄露有关机构数据的信息。此外,当执行计算的实体之间信任度有限时,FL 可能会带来一些问题。随着 FL 在医疗保健领域的应用越来越广泛,阐明其潜在风险势在必行。因此,我们在这项工作中总结了保护隐私的 FL 文献,并特别关注医疗保健领域。我们提醒大家注意威胁,并回顾了缓解方法。我们希望这篇综述能成为医疗保健研究人员在 FL 安全和隐私方面的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Privacy preservation for federated learning in health care

Privacy preservation for federated learning in health care

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential to improve health care by leveraging data to build models that can inform clinical workflows. However, access to large quantities of diverse data is needed to develop robust generalizable models. Data sharing across institutions is not always feasible due to legal, security, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) allows for multi-institutional training of AI models, obviating data sharing, albeit with different security and privacy concerns. Specifically, insights exchanged during FL can leak information about institutional data. In addition, FL can introduce issues when there is limited trust among the entities performing the compute. With the growing adoption of FL in health care, it is imperative to elucidate the potential risks. We thus summarize privacy-preserving FL literature in this work with special regard to health care. We draw attention to threats and review mitigation approaches. We anticipate this review to become a health-care researcher’s guide to security and privacy in FL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信