了解西班牙社会工作者和卫生专业人员对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女的公开指责

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Lara Murvartian, Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías, Manuel Luis de la Mata, Allison Crowe
{"title":"了解西班牙社会工作者和卫生专业人员对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女的公开指责","authors":"Lara Murvartian, Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías, Manuel Luis de la Mata, Allison Crowe","doi":"10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Social workers and health professionals play a relevant role in the detection and intervention of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). However, these professionals may exert public stigma against IPVAW survivors, which prevents disclosure, help seeking and affects women’s health. There are no comprehensive models that explain stigma functioning in Spain. Our aim was to explore the functioning of such stigma that may be exercised by social workers and health professionals in Spain. Their perceived impact of stigma on survivors was also studied.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Interviews with 18 providers were conducted and analyzed through template analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The findings confirmed the presence of stigma and revealed that it was often unintentional. Factors about the <i>Roots of stigma</i> were identified (e.g., <i>Privileged social identities</i> or <i>Symptom-focused role of psychology</i>), which triggered several <i>Myths about IPVAW and survivors</i> (e.g., <i>Broken toy</i> or <i>Survivo</i>r-<i>profile</i>) and <i>Stigmatizing responses</i> (e.g., <i>Being paternalistic</i> or <i>Judging</i>) when offering professional help. Several consequences of these myths and responses showed the perceived high <i>Cost of stigma</i> for survivors (e.g., <i>Leaving support services</i> or <i>Internalizing stigma</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirmed the importance of effective professional training to prevent stigmatizing myths and responses. Training should reduce professionals’ patriarchal values, increase their knowledge about IPVAW, self-reflection on how personal experiences and social identity influence their practice, and self-reflection on their own practice in general. Such training should also promote an intersectional perspective on recovery, a view of survivors as agents, a contextual approach, active listening, close contact with survivors, and informed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Violence","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Social Workers and Health Professionals’ Public Stigma against Women who Experience Intimate Partner Violence in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Lara Murvartian, Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías, Manuel Luis de la Mata, Allison Crowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Social workers and health professionals play a relevant role in the detection and intervention of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). However, these professionals may exert public stigma against IPVAW survivors, which prevents disclosure, help seeking and affects women’s health. There are no comprehensive models that explain stigma functioning in Spain. Our aim was to explore the functioning of such stigma that may be exercised by social workers and health professionals in Spain. Their perceived impact of stigma on survivors was also studied.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Interviews with 18 providers were conducted and analyzed through template analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The findings confirmed the presence of stigma and revealed that it was often unintentional. Factors about the <i>Roots of stigma</i> were identified (e.g., <i>Privileged social identities</i> or <i>Symptom-focused role of psychology</i>), which triggered several <i>Myths about IPVAW and survivors</i> (e.g., <i>Broken toy</i> or <i>Survivo</i>r-<i>profile</i>) and <i>Stigmatizing responses</i> (e.g., <i>Being paternalistic</i> or <i>Judging</i>) when offering professional help. Several consequences of these myths and responses showed the perceived high <i>Cost of stigma</i> for survivors (e.g., <i>Leaving support services</i> or <i>Internalizing stigma</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirmed the importance of effective professional training to prevent stigmatizing myths and responses. Training should reduce professionals’ patriarchal values, increase their knowledge about IPVAW, self-reflection on how personal experiences and social identity influence their practice, and self-reflection on their own practice in general. Such training should also promote an intersectional perspective on recovery, a view of survivors as agents, a contextual approach, active listening, close contact with survivors, and informed care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 社会工作者和卫生专业人员在发现和干预亲密伴侣对妇女的暴力行为(IPVAW)方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这些专业人员可能会对亲密伴侣暴力幸存者产生公众成见,从而阻碍了她们披露信息、寻求帮助并影响了她们的健康。在西班牙,还没有一个全面的模型来解释成见的作用。我们的目的是探索西班牙社会工作者和医疗专业人员可能实施的这种成见的功能。我们对 18 名提供者进行了访谈,并通过模板分析法对访谈结果进行了分析。研究结果证实了成见的存在,并揭示了成见往往是无意的。研究发现了成见的根源因素(如特权社会身份或心理学以症状为中心的作用),这些因素在提供专业帮助时引发了一些关于暴力侵害妇女行为和幸存者的误解(如玩具破损或幸存者档案)和成见反应(如家长式作风或评判)。这些谬论和反应的一些后果表明,幸存者认为污名化的代价很高(例如,离开支持服务或污名内化)。培训应减少专业人员的重男轻女价值观,增加他们对暴力侵害妇女问题的了解,反思个人经历和社会身份如何影响他们的工作,并对自己的工作进行总体反思。此类培训还应促进从跨部门的角度看待康复问题,将幸存者视为推动者,采取因地制宜的方法,积极倾听,与幸存者密切接触,并提供知情关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding Social Workers and Health Professionals’ Public Stigma against Women who Experience Intimate Partner Violence in Spain

Understanding Social Workers and Health Professionals’ Public Stigma against Women who Experience Intimate Partner Violence in Spain

Purpose

Social workers and health professionals play a relevant role in the detection and intervention of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). However, these professionals may exert public stigma against IPVAW survivors, which prevents disclosure, help seeking and affects women’s health. There are no comprehensive models that explain stigma functioning in Spain. Our aim was to explore the functioning of such stigma that may be exercised by social workers and health professionals in Spain. Their perceived impact of stigma on survivors was also studied.

Methods

Interviews with 18 providers were conducted and analyzed through template analysis.

Results

The findings confirmed the presence of stigma and revealed that it was often unintentional. Factors about the Roots of stigma were identified (e.g., Privileged social identities or Symptom-focused role of psychology), which triggered several Myths about IPVAW and survivors (e.g., Broken toy or Survivor-profile) and Stigmatizing responses (e.g., Being paternalistic or Judging) when offering professional help. Several consequences of these myths and responses showed the perceived high Cost of stigma for survivors (e.g., Leaving support services or Internalizing stigma).

Conclusions

The results confirmed the importance of effective professional training to prevent stigmatizing myths and responses. Training should reduce professionals’ patriarchal values, increase their knowledge about IPVAW, self-reflection on how personal experiences and social identity influence their practice, and self-reflection on their own practice in general. Such training should also promote an intersectional perspective on recovery, a view of survivors as agents, a contextual approach, active listening, close contact with survivors, and informed care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Violence (JOFV) is a peer-reviewed publication committed to the dissemination of rigorous research on preventing, ending, and ameliorating all forms of family violence.  JOFV welcomes scholarly articles related to the broad categories of child abuse and maltreatment, dating violence, domestic and partner violence, and elder abuse. Within these categories, JOFV emphasizes research on physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, and homicides that occur in families. Studies on families in all their various forms and diversities are welcome.  JOFV publishes studies using quantitative, qualitative, and/or mixed methods involving the collection of primary data. Rigorous systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical analyses are also welcome. To help advance scientific understandings of family violence, JOFV is especially interested in research using transdisciplinary perspectives and innovative research methods. Because family violence is a global problem requiring solutions from diverse disciplinary perspectives, JOFV strongly encourages submissions from scholars worldwide from all disciplines and backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信