Lara Murvartian, Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías, Manuel Luis de la Mata, Allison Crowe
{"title":"了解西班牙社会工作者和卫生专业人员对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女的公开指责","authors":"Lara Murvartian, Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías, Manuel Luis de la Mata, Allison Crowe","doi":"10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Social workers and health professionals play a relevant role in the detection and intervention of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). However, these professionals may exert public stigma against IPVAW survivors, which prevents disclosure, help seeking and affects women’s health. There are no comprehensive models that explain stigma functioning in Spain. Our aim was to explore the functioning of such stigma that may be exercised by social workers and health professionals in Spain. Their perceived impact of stigma on survivors was also studied.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Interviews with 18 providers were conducted and analyzed through template analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The findings confirmed the presence of stigma and revealed that it was often unintentional. Factors about the <i>Roots of stigma</i> were identified (e.g., <i>Privileged social identities</i> or <i>Symptom-focused role of psychology</i>), which triggered several <i>Myths about IPVAW and survivors</i> (e.g., <i>Broken toy</i> or <i>Survivo</i>r-<i>profile</i>) and <i>Stigmatizing responses</i> (e.g., <i>Being paternalistic</i> or <i>Judging</i>) when offering professional help. Several consequences of these myths and responses showed the perceived high <i>Cost of stigma</i> for survivors (e.g., <i>Leaving support services</i> or <i>Internalizing stigma</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirmed the importance of effective professional training to prevent stigmatizing myths and responses. Training should reduce professionals’ patriarchal values, increase their knowledge about IPVAW, self-reflection on how personal experiences and social identity influence their practice, and self-reflection on their own practice in general. Such training should also promote an intersectional perspective on recovery, a view of survivors as agents, a contextual approach, active listening, close contact with survivors, and informed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Violence","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Social Workers and Health Professionals’ Public Stigma against Women who Experience Intimate Partner Violence in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Lara Murvartian, Francisco Javier Saavedra-Macías, Manuel Luis de la Mata, Allison Crowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Social workers and health professionals play a relevant role in the detection and intervention of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). However, these professionals may exert public stigma against IPVAW survivors, which prevents disclosure, help seeking and affects women’s health. There are no comprehensive models that explain stigma functioning in Spain. Our aim was to explore the functioning of such stigma that may be exercised by social workers and health professionals in Spain. Their perceived impact of stigma on survivors was also studied.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Interviews with 18 providers were conducted and analyzed through template analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The findings confirmed the presence of stigma and revealed that it was often unintentional. Factors about the <i>Roots of stigma</i> were identified (e.g., <i>Privileged social identities</i> or <i>Symptom-focused role of psychology</i>), which triggered several <i>Myths about IPVAW and survivors</i> (e.g., <i>Broken toy</i> or <i>Survivo</i>r-<i>profile</i>) and <i>Stigmatizing responses</i> (e.g., <i>Being paternalistic</i> or <i>Judging</i>) when offering professional help. Several consequences of these myths and responses showed the perceived high <i>Cost of stigma</i> for survivors (e.g., <i>Leaving support services</i> or <i>Internalizing stigma</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirmed the importance of effective professional training to prevent stigmatizing myths and responses. Training should reduce professionals’ patriarchal values, increase their knowledge about IPVAW, self-reflection on how personal experiences and social identity influence their practice, and self-reflection on their own practice in general. Such training should also promote an intersectional perspective on recovery, a view of survivors as agents, a contextual approach, active listening, close contact with survivors, and informed care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00714-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Social Workers and Health Professionals’ Public Stigma against Women who Experience Intimate Partner Violence in Spain
Purpose
Social workers and health professionals play a relevant role in the detection and intervention of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). However, these professionals may exert public stigma against IPVAW survivors, which prevents disclosure, help seeking and affects women’s health. There are no comprehensive models that explain stigma functioning in Spain. Our aim was to explore the functioning of such stigma that may be exercised by social workers and health professionals in Spain. Their perceived impact of stigma on survivors was also studied.
Methods
Interviews with 18 providers were conducted and analyzed through template analysis.
Results
The findings confirmed the presence of stigma and revealed that it was often unintentional. Factors about the Roots of stigma were identified (e.g., Privileged social identities or Symptom-focused role of psychology), which triggered several Myths about IPVAW and survivors (e.g., Broken toy or Survivor-profile) and Stigmatizing responses (e.g., Being paternalistic or Judging) when offering professional help. Several consequences of these myths and responses showed the perceived high Cost of stigma for survivors (e.g., Leaving support services or Internalizing stigma).
Conclusions
The results confirmed the importance of effective professional training to prevent stigmatizing myths and responses. Training should reduce professionals’ patriarchal values, increase their knowledge about IPVAW, self-reflection on how personal experiences and social identity influence their practice, and self-reflection on their own practice in general. Such training should also promote an intersectional perspective on recovery, a view of survivors as agents, a contextual approach, active listening, close contact with survivors, and informed care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Family Violence (JOFV) is a peer-reviewed publication committed to the dissemination of rigorous research on preventing, ending, and ameliorating all forms of family violence. JOFV welcomes scholarly articles related to the broad categories of child abuse and maltreatment, dating violence, domestic and partner violence, and elder abuse. Within these categories, JOFV emphasizes research on physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, and homicides that occur in families. Studies on families in all their various forms and diversities are welcome. JOFV publishes studies using quantitative, qualitative, and/or mixed methods involving the collection of primary data. Rigorous systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical analyses are also welcome. To help advance scientific understandings of family violence, JOFV is especially interested in research using transdisciplinary perspectives and innovative research methods. Because family violence is a global problem requiring solutions from diverse disciplinary perspectives, JOFV strongly encourages submissions from scholars worldwide from all disciplines and backgrounds.