乳房切除、腋窝清创和假体重建后腋窝死腔闭合的疗效:单中心初步经验

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Andrea Lisa, Giulia Bozzo, Valeriano Vinci, Francesco Maria Klinger, Valentina Errico, Corrado Tinterri, Marco Ettore Attilio Klinger, Alberto Testori
{"title":"乳房切除、腋窝清创和假体重建后腋窝死腔闭合的疗效:单中心初步经验","authors":"Andrea Lisa, Giulia Bozzo, Valeriano Vinci, Francesco Maria Klinger, Valentina Errico, Corrado Tinterri, Marco Ettore Attilio Klinger, Alberto Testori","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1401699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPostoperative seroma is most frequent after mastectomy (ME) in combination with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and its reported incidence varies from 15.5% up to 90%. Seromas can be responsible for discomfort, infections and can lead to reconstruction failure. Therefore, many ways of seroma prevention have been studied, although from a recent overview it has become clear that no single method is reliably successful. Mechanical closure of the dead space, however, was consistently found to be significantly effective. The aim of our study is to evaluate if quilting of the axilla, in patients undergoing ME, immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction and ALND reduces the duration of drain maintenance, the incidence of seromas that require aspiration (clinically significant seromas, CSS) and reconstruction failure rate.Materials and methodsIn our study population we analyzed a total of 81 patients divided into two groups: 27 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), breast reconstruction and quilting of the axilla. We subsequently randomly picked up a double number of patients (54) undergoing the same oncological and reconstructive procedures without undergoing axillary quilting, matched for clinical characteristics in order to analyze efficacy of the procedure while reducing any bias. Our observational retrospective data was collected from October 2016 to July 2020 in one single high-volume center. Our median follow-up time was of 40.6 months.ResultsIn the case group we observed a reduced time of drain maintenance: 16 vs. 20 days observed in the non-quilted group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.05). Incidence of seromas that required aspiration was 11% in the control group, while 3,7% in the case group. In addition to that, we observed 6 cases of implant removal in the control group, while in the quilted group we only observed a single case.ConclusionPrevious literature and our results confirm that quilting of the axilla with flap fixation significantly decreases time of drain maintenance, allowing the earlier removal of the drains as well as decreasing the incidence of seroma, its eventual associated complications and related social costs. Moreover, our work suggests how quilting sutures decrease the incidence of seroma in patients undergoing immediate reconstruction, probably reducing the risk for implant removal.","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of axillary dead space closure after mastectomy, axillary clearance and prosthetic reconstruction: a single-center preliminary experience\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lisa, Giulia Bozzo, Valeriano Vinci, Francesco Maria Klinger, Valentina Errico, Corrado Tinterri, Marco Ettore Attilio Klinger, Alberto Testori\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1401699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundPostoperative seroma is most frequent after mastectomy (ME) in combination with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and its reported incidence varies from 15.5% up to 90%. Seromas can be responsible for discomfort, infections and can lead to reconstruction failure. Therefore, many ways of seroma prevention have been studied, although from a recent overview it has become clear that no single method is reliably successful. Mechanical closure of the dead space, however, was consistently found to be significantly effective. The aim of our study is to evaluate if quilting of the axilla, in patients undergoing ME, immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction and ALND reduces the duration of drain maintenance, the incidence of seromas that require aspiration (clinically significant seromas, CSS) and reconstruction failure rate.Materials and methodsIn our study population we analyzed a total of 81 patients divided into two groups: 27 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), breast reconstruction and quilting of the axilla. We subsequently randomly picked up a double number of patients (54) undergoing the same oncological and reconstructive procedures without undergoing axillary quilting, matched for clinical characteristics in order to analyze efficacy of the procedure while reducing any bias. Our observational retrospective data was collected from October 2016 to July 2020 in one single high-volume center. Our median follow-up time was of 40.6 months.ResultsIn the case group we observed a reduced time of drain maintenance: 16 vs. 20 days observed in the non-quilted group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.05). Incidence of seromas that required aspiration was 11% in the control group, while 3,7% in the case group. In addition to that, we observed 6 cases of implant removal in the control group, while in the quilted group we only observed a single case.ConclusionPrevious literature and our results confirm that quilting of the axilla with flap fixation significantly decreases time of drain maintenance, allowing the earlier removal of the drains as well as decreasing the incidence of seroma, its eventual associated complications and related social costs. Moreover, our work suggests how quilting sutures decrease the incidence of seroma in patients undergoing immediate reconstruction, probably reducing the risk for implant removal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1401699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1401699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术后血清肿是乳房切除术(ME)合并腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)后最常见的并发症,据报道其发生率从 15.5% 到 90% 不等。血清肿可能造成不适、感染,并可能导致重建失败。因此,人们研究了许多预防血清肿的方法,但从最近的综述中可以看出,没有一种方法是可靠成功的。不过,对死腔进行机械闭合一直被认为是非常有效的方法。我们的研究旨在评估腋窝绗缝是否能缩短接受ME、即刻假体乳房重建和ALND手术患者的引流管维持时间,减少需要抽吸的血清肿(临床意义血清肿,CSS)的发生率和重建失败率。随后,我们随机抽取了双倍数量的患者(54 例),这些患者接受了相同的肿瘤和整形手术,但没有进行腋窝绗缝,他们的临床特征匹配,以便在分析手术疗效的同时减少任何偏差。我们的观察性回顾数据是2016年10月至2020年7月在一个高容量中心收集的。中位随访时间为 40.6 个月。结果在病例组中,我们观察到引流管维护时间缩短:16 天,而非缝合组为 20 天(p &p;lt;0.05)。对照组需要抽吸的血清肿发生率为 11%,而病例组为 3.7%。结论之前的文献和我们的研究结果都证实,腋窝绗缝皮瓣固定术能显著缩短引流管的维护时间,提前拔除引流管,降低血清肿的发生率、相关并发症和相关社会成本。此外,我们的研究还表明了绗缝如何降低即刻重建患者血清肿的发生率,从而降低植入物移除的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of axillary dead space closure after mastectomy, axillary clearance and prosthetic reconstruction: a single-center preliminary experience
BackgroundPostoperative seroma is most frequent after mastectomy (ME) in combination with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and its reported incidence varies from 15.5% up to 90%. Seromas can be responsible for discomfort, infections and can lead to reconstruction failure. Therefore, many ways of seroma prevention have been studied, although from a recent overview it has become clear that no single method is reliably successful. Mechanical closure of the dead space, however, was consistently found to be significantly effective. The aim of our study is to evaluate if quilting of the axilla, in patients undergoing ME, immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction and ALND reduces the duration of drain maintenance, the incidence of seromas that require aspiration (clinically significant seromas, CSS) and reconstruction failure rate.Materials and methodsIn our study population we analyzed a total of 81 patients divided into two groups: 27 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), breast reconstruction and quilting of the axilla. We subsequently randomly picked up a double number of patients (54) undergoing the same oncological and reconstructive procedures without undergoing axillary quilting, matched for clinical characteristics in order to analyze efficacy of the procedure while reducing any bias. Our observational retrospective data was collected from October 2016 to July 2020 in one single high-volume center. Our median follow-up time was of 40.6 months.ResultsIn the case group we observed a reduced time of drain maintenance: 16 vs. 20 days observed in the non-quilted group (p &lt; 0.05). Incidence of seromas that required aspiration was 11% in the control group, while 3,7% in the case group. In addition to that, we observed 6 cases of implant removal in the control group, while in the quilted group we only observed a single case.ConclusionPrevious literature and our results confirm that quilting of the axilla with flap fixation significantly decreases time of drain maintenance, allowing the earlier removal of the drains as well as decreasing the incidence of seroma, its eventual associated complications and related social costs. Moreover, our work suggests how quilting sutures decrease the incidence of seroma in patients undergoing immediate reconstruction, probably reducing the risk for implant removal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信