超越社会影响:研究非社会推荐的功效

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Danae Arroyos-Calvera , Johannes Lohse , Rebecca McDonald
{"title":"超越社会影响:研究非社会推荐的功效","authors":"Danae Arroyos-Calvera ,&nbsp;Johannes Lohse ,&nbsp;Rebecca McDonald","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Do recommendations need to contain social information to change behaviour in allocation and risk tasks? We conducted two online experiments involving 1280 participants to compare the behavioural influence of recommendations based on normatively relevant information with that of recommendations that were transparently random. Although social recommendations generally shifted choices towards the recommended option, consistent with previous studies on norm compliance, their effects were statistically indistinguishable from those of random recommendations. This finding challenges the notion that norm compliance is the sole mechanism through which social recommendations exert their influence. In a follow-up study with 481 participants, we investigated four additional channels. Our results suggest that recommendations do not act as reminders of existing normative knowledge, but we find evidence partially consistent with recommendation following in order to deflect responsibility, because of an anchoring effect, and because of a social norm to follow recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124001302/pdfft?md5=d7e73745ead608b3f63c33886e8be537&pid=1-s2.0-S0014292124001302-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond social influence: Examining the efficacy of non-social recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Danae Arroyos-Calvera ,&nbsp;Johannes Lohse ,&nbsp;Rebecca McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Do recommendations need to contain social information to change behaviour in allocation and risk tasks? We conducted two online experiments involving 1280 participants to compare the behavioural influence of recommendations based on normatively relevant information with that of recommendations that were transparently random. Although social recommendations generally shifted choices towards the recommended option, consistent with previous studies on norm compliance, their effects were statistically indistinguishable from those of random recommendations. This finding challenges the notion that norm compliance is the sole mechanism through which social recommendations exert their influence. In a follow-up study with 481 participants, we investigated four additional channels. Our results suggest that recommendations do not act as reminders of existing normative knowledge, but we find evidence partially consistent with recommendation following in order to deflect responsibility, because of an anchoring effect, and because of a social norm to follow recommendations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124001302/pdfft?md5=d7e73745ead608b3f63c33886e8be537&pid=1-s2.0-S0014292124001302-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124001302\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124001302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推荐是否需要包含社会信息才能改变分配和风险任务中的行为?我们进行了两项有 1280 名参与者参与的在线实验,比较了基于规范相关信息的推荐与透明随机推荐对行为的影响。虽然社会推荐通常会使选择转向推荐的选项,这与之前关于规范遵从的研究一致,但其效果在统计上与随机推荐的效果没有区别。这一发现对 "规范遵从是社会推荐施加影响的唯一机制 "这一观点提出了质疑。在一项有 481 名参与者参与的后续研究中,我们对另外四种渠道进行了调查。我们的研究结果表明,推荐并不是对已有规范性知识的提醒,但我们发现部分证据表明,遵循推荐是为了转移责任,因为锚定效应,以及因为遵循推荐的社会规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond social influence: Examining the efficacy of non-social recommendations

Do recommendations need to contain social information to change behaviour in allocation and risk tasks? We conducted two online experiments involving 1280 participants to compare the behavioural influence of recommendations based on normatively relevant information with that of recommendations that were transparently random. Although social recommendations generally shifted choices towards the recommended option, consistent with previous studies on norm compliance, their effects were statistically indistinguishable from those of random recommendations. This finding challenges the notion that norm compliance is the sole mechanism through which social recommendations exert their influence. In a follow-up study with 481 participants, we investigated four additional channels. Our results suggest that recommendations do not act as reminders of existing normative knowledge, but we find evidence partially consistent with recommendation following in order to deflect responsibility, because of an anchoring effect, and because of a social norm to follow recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信