实验性闭环水流分离控制:数据和现象驱动方法

IF 2.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
T. Arnoult , G. Acher , V. Nowinski , P. Vuillemin , C. Briat , P. Pernod , C. Ghouila-Houri , A. Talbi , E. Garnier , C. Poussot-Vassal
{"title":"实验性闭环水流分离控制:数据和现象驱动方法","authors":"T. Arnoult ,&nbsp;G. Acher ,&nbsp;V. Nowinski ,&nbsp;P. Vuillemin ,&nbsp;C. Briat ,&nbsp;P. Pernod ,&nbsp;C. Ghouila-Houri ,&nbsp;A. Talbi ,&nbsp;E. Garnier ,&nbsp;C. Poussot-Vassal","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcon.2024.101082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flow control aims at modifying a natural flow state to reach an other flow state considered as advantageous. In this paper, active feedback flow separation control is investigated with two different closed-loop control strategies, involving a reference signal tracking architecture. Firstly, a data-driven control law, leading to a linear (integral) controller is employed. Secondly, a phenomenological/model-driven approach, leading to a non-linear positive (integral) control strategy is investigated. While the former benefits of a tuning simplicity, the latter prevents undesirable effects and formally guarantees closed-loop stability. Both control approaches were validated through wind tunnel experiments of flow separation control over a movable NACA 4412 plain flap. These control laws were designed with respect to hot-film measurements, performed over the flap for different deflection angles. Both control approaches proved efficient in avoiding flow separation. The main contribution of this work stands in providing practitioners, simple but yet efficient control design methods for the flow separation phenomena. Equivalently important, a complete validation campaign data-set is also provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50489,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Control","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0947358024001420/pdfft?md5=6a3d2b26da4f7bdc735b1077c6803254&pid=1-s2.0-S0947358024001420-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental closed-loop flow separation control: Data- and phenomenological-driven approaches\",\"authors\":\"T. Arnoult ,&nbsp;G. Acher ,&nbsp;V. Nowinski ,&nbsp;P. Vuillemin ,&nbsp;C. Briat ,&nbsp;P. Pernod ,&nbsp;C. Ghouila-Houri ,&nbsp;A. Talbi ,&nbsp;E. Garnier ,&nbsp;C. Poussot-Vassal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcon.2024.101082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Flow control aims at modifying a natural flow state to reach an other flow state considered as advantageous. In this paper, active feedback flow separation control is investigated with two different closed-loop control strategies, involving a reference signal tracking architecture. Firstly, a data-driven control law, leading to a linear (integral) controller is employed. Secondly, a phenomenological/model-driven approach, leading to a non-linear positive (integral) control strategy is investigated. While the former benefits of a tuning simplicity, the latter prevents undesirable effects and formally guarantees closed-loop stability. Both control approaches were validated through wind tunnel experiments of flow separation control over a movable NACA 4412 plain flap. These control laws were designed with respect to hot-film measurements, performed over the flap for different deflection angles. Both control approaches proved efficient in avoiding flow separation. The main contribution of this work stands in providing practitioners, simple but yet efficient control design methods for the flow separation phenomena. Equivalently important, a complete validation campaign data-set is also provided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Control\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0947358024001420/pdfft?md5=6a3d2b26da4f7bdc735b1077c6803254&pid=1-s2.0-S0947358024001420-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0947358024001420\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0947358024001420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流量控制的目的是改变自然流量状态,以达到另一种被认为有利的流量状态。本文通过两种不同的闭环控制策略,对涉及参考信号跟踪架构的主动反馈流量分离控制进行了研究。首先,采用数据驱动控制法,从而产生线性(积分)控制器。其次,研究了一种现象学/模型驱动方法,该方法导致了一种非线性正(积分)控制策略。前者的优点是调整简单,而后者则能防止不良影响,并从形式上保证闭环稳定性。通过对可移动 NACA 4412 平滑襟翼的气流分离控制进行风洞实验,对这两种控制方法进行了验证。这些控制法则是根据在不同偏转角度下对襟翼进行的热膜测量而设计的。事实证明,这两种控制方法都能有效避免气流分离。这项工作的主要贡献在于为从业人员提供了针对气流分离现象的简单而有效的控制设计方法。同样重要的是,还提供了完整的验证活动数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental closed-loop flow separation control: Data- and phenomenological-driven approaches

Flow control aims at modifying a natural flow state to reach an other flow state considered as advantageous. In this paper, active feedback flow separation control is investigated with two different closed-loop control strategies, involving a reference signal tracking architecture. Firstly, a data-driven control law, leading to a linear (integral) controller is employed. Secondly, a phenomenological/model-driven approach, leading to a non-linear positive (integral) control strategy is investigated. While the former benefits of a tuning simplicity, the latter prevents undesirable effects and formally guarantees closed-loop stability. Both control approaches were validated through wind tunnel experiments of flow separation control over a movable NACA 4412 plain flap. These control laws were designed with respect to hot-film measurements, performed over the flap for different deflection angles. Both control approaches proved efficient in avoiding flow separation. The main contribution of this work stands in providing practitioners, simple but yet efficient control design methods for the flow separation phenomena. Equivalently important, a complete validation campaign data-set is also provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Control
European Journal of Control 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
131
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Control Association (EUCA) has among its objectives to promote the development of the discipline. Apart from the European Control Conferences, the European Journal of Control is the Association''s main channel for the dissemination of important contributions in the field. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality papers on the theory and practice of control and systems engineering. The scope of the Journal will be wide and cover all aspects of the discipline including methodologies, techniques and applications. Research in control and systems engineering is necessary to develop new concepts and tools which enhance our understanding and improve our ability to design and implement high performance control systems. Submitted papers should stress the practical motivations and relevance of their results. The design and implementation of a successful control system requires the use of a range of techniques: Modelling Robustness Analysis Identification Optimization Control Law Design Numerical analysis Fault Detection, and so on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信