公共支出偏好的信息效应:来自波兰调查实验的证据

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jakub Sawulski , Nikodem Szewczyk , Aneta Kiełczewska
{"title":"公共支出偏好的信息效应:来自波兰调查实验的证据","authors":"Jakub Sawulski ,&nbsp;Nikodem Szewczyk ,&nbsp;Aneta Kiełczewska","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate whether the provision of information about the structure of public spending influences the public’s preferences in this regard. Using experimental data from a survey of 1800 Polish citizens, we uncover large misperceptions about the allocation of public spending. Respondents consistently underestimate the share of spending allocated to pensions, while overestimating the share allocated to environmental protection and public administration. However, when informed about the real structure of public spending, citizens express substantially different preferences for spending cuts or increases in some areas. The differences are particularly pronounced in those categories where beliefs about the size of spending are most distorted, with one exception — the treatment has minimal effect on the strong opposition to spending on public administration. In addition, we show that the provision of information improves the initially low assessment of government efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51439,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information effects in public spending preferences: Evidence from survey experiment in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Sawulski ,&nbsp;Nikodem Szewczyk ,&nbsp;Aneta Kiełczewska\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigate whether the provision of information about the structure of public spending influences the public’s preferences in this regard. Using experimental data from a survey of 1800 Polish citizens, we uncover large misperceptions about the allocation of public spending. Respondents consistently underestimate the share of spending allocated to pensions, while overestimating the share allocated to environmental protection and public administration. However, when informed about the real structure of public spending, citizens express substantially different preferences for spending cuts or increases in some areas. The differences are particularly pronounced in those categories where beliefs about the size of spending are most distorted, with one exception — the treatment has minimal effect on the strong opposition to spending on public administration. In addition, we show that the provision of information improves the initially low assessment of government efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024000600\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024000600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了提供有关公共支出结构的信息是否会影响公众在这方面的偏好。我们利用对 1800 名波兰公民进行调查所获得的实验数据,发现了对公共支出分配的巨大误解。受访者总是低估用于养老金的支出比例,而高估用于环境保护和公共管理的支出比例。然而,当了解到公共支出的实际结构后,公民对某些领域的支出削减或增加所表达的偏好却大相径庭。在那些对支出规模的看法被扭曲得最严重的领域,差异尤为明显,但有一个例外--处理方法对强烈反对公共行政支出的影响微乎其微。此外,我们还发现,信息的提供改善了最初对政府效率的低评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information effects in public spending preferences: Evidence from survey experiment in Poland

We investigate whether the provision of information about the structure of public spending influences the public’s preferences in this regard. Using experimental data from a survey of 1800 Polish citizens, we uncover large misperceptions about the allocation of public spending. Respondents consistently underestimate the share of spending allocated to pensions, while overestimating the share allocated to environmental protection and public administration. However, when informed about the real structure of public spending, citizens express substantially different preferences for spending cuts or increases in some areas. The differences are particularly pronounced in those categories where beliefs about the size of spending are most distorted, with one exception — the treatment has minimal effect on the strong opposition to spending on public administration. In addition, we show that the provision of information improves the initially low assessment of government efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Political Economy is to disseminate original theoretical and empirical research on economic phenomena within a scope that encompasses collective decision making, political behavior, and the role of institutions. Contributions are invited from the international community of researchers. Manuscripts must be published in English. Starting 2008, the European Journal of Political Economy is indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index published by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信