[基于评级定义的医疗保健系统比较分析]。

Q4 Medicine
R U Khabriev, M E Kolomiychenko
{"title":"[基于评级定义的医疗保健系统比较分析]。","authors":"R U Khabriev, M E Kolomiychenko","doi":"10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-3-303-310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The comparative analysis of effectiveness and efficiency of health care systems functioning causes a number of difficulties due to different indicators applied in countries as assessment tools, different data collection mechanisms and differences in nature and dimension of determining indicators. To ensure comparability of absolute values of various indicators and possibility to compare activities of single medical organizations and effectiveness of health care system of both various Subjects of the Russian Federation and health care system as a whole, it is possible to apply different rating techniques. The article presents comprehensive comparative analysis of activities of health care systems based on construction of rating using integral indicators of public health: indicators of key functioning of health systems (financial support and infrastructure development), total mortality from non-communicable diseases, probability of dying at the age of 30 to 70 years from any of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases, universal health coverage index, life expectancy (at birth and at the age of 60). The comprehensive comparative analysis of results permitted to to conclude that the greatest financial costs for health care and best level of infrastructural support (beds and medical personnel) in countries with health insurance system. At that, according to ranking results and all selected integral public health indicators, health insurance system took the first place.</p>","PeriodicalId":35946,"journal":{"name":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The comparative analysis of health care systems based on rating definition].\",\"authors\":\"R U Khabriev, M E Kolomiychenko\",\"doi\":\"10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-3-303-310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The comparative analysis of effectiveness and efficiency of health care systems functioning causes a number of difficulties due to different indicators applied in countries as assessment tools, different data collection mechanisms and differences in nature and dimension of determining indicators. To ensure comparability of absolute values of various indicators and possibility to compare activities of single medical organizations and effectiveness of health care system of both various Subjects of the Russian Federation and health care system as a whole, it is possible to apply different rating techniques. The article presents comprehensive comparative analysis of activities of health care systems based on construction of rating using integral indicators of public health: indicators of key functioning of health systems (financial support and infrastructure development), total mortality from non-communicable diseases, probability of dying at the age of 30 to 70 years from any of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases, universal health coverage index, life expectancy (at birth and at the age of 60). The comprehensive comparative analysis of results permitted to to conclude that the greatest financial costs for health care and best level of infrastructural support (beds and medical personnel) in countries with health insurance system. At that, according to ranking results and all selected integral public health indicators, health insurance system took the first place.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-3-303-310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy sotsial''noi gigieny i istoriia meditsiny / NII sotsial''noi gigieny, ekonomiki i upravleniia zdravookhraneniem im. N.A. Semashko RAMN, AO ''Assotsiatsiia ''Meditsinskaia literatura''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-3-303-310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于各国采用的评估工具指标不同、数据收集机制不同以及确定指标的性质和维度不同,对医疗 保健系统运行的有效性和效率进行比较分析存在诸多困难。为了确保各种指标绝对值的可比性,以及对单个医疗机构的活动和俄罗斯联邦各主体及整个医疗体系的医疗保健系统的有效性进行比较,可以采用不同的评级技术。文章在利用公共卫生综合指标构建评级的基础上,对医疗系统的活动进行了全面的比较分析:医疗系统主要功能指标(财政支持和基础设施发展)、非传染性疾病总死亡率、30 至 70 岁时死于心血管疾病、癌症、糖尿病或慢性呼吸系统疾病的概率、全民健康覆盖指数、预期寿命(出生时和 60 岁时)。通过对结果进行综合比较分析,可以得出这样的结论:在实行医疗保险制度的国家,医疗保健的财务成本最高,基础设施支持(床位和医务人员)的水平最高。因此,根据排名结果和所有选定的公共卫生综合指标,医疗保险制度居于首位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The comparative analysis of health care systems based on rating definition].

The comparative analysis of effectiveness and efficiency of health care systems functioning causes a number of difficulties due to different indicators applied in countries as assessment tools, different data collection mechanisms and differences in nature and dimension of determining indicators. To ensure comparability of absolute values of various indicators and possibility to compare activities of single medical organizations and effectiveness of health care system of both various Subjects of the Russian Federation and health care system as a whole, it is possible to apply different rating techniques. The article presents comprehensive comparative analysis of activities of health care systems based on construction of rating using integral indicators of public health: indicators of key functioning of health systems (financial support and infrastructure development), total mortality from non-communicable diseases, probability of dying at the age of 30 to 70 years from any of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases, universal health coverage index, life expectancy (at birth and at the age of 60). The comprehensive comparative analysis of results permitted to to conclude that the greatest financial costs for health care and best level of infrastructural support (beds and medical personnel) in countries with health insurance system. At that, according to ranking results and all selected integral public health indicators, health insurance system took the first place.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信