{"title":"强迫症自体亚型和反应亚型的早期适应不良图式。","authors":"Muhammed Raşit Bardakçı, Merve Şahin Can","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2374416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify early maladaptive schemas in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to determine the use of these schemas in OCD autogenous and reactive subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population included 40 healthy volunteers, and 90 patients diagnosed with OCD. The Yale-Brown Obsession-Compulsion Scale (Y-BOCS) was administered to the OCD group to determine the severity of the disorder, and the Y-BOCS Symptom Checklist was applied to determine the patients with autogenous (<i>n</i> = 37) and reactive (<i>n</i> = 53) subtypes of OCD. Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3 (YSQ-SF3) scales were applied to all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When autogenous and reactive subtype groups of OCD were compared with each other, the schema domains of disconnection (<i>p</i> = 0.004), high standards (<i>p</i> = 0.008), other-directedness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the schema dimensions of failure (<i>p</i> < 0.001), emotional deprivation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), defectiveness (<i>p</i> = 0.007), approval seeking (<i>p</i> = 0.007) and punishment (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were found to be more dominant in the autogenous group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of the study support that there are differences between autogenous and reactive subtypes of OCD in terms of dominant schemas. Therefore, its thought that the use of Schema Therapy methods in which schemas appropriate for subtypes are investigated in the treatment of OCD patients will contribute favorably to the treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"541-547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early maladaptive schemas in autogenous and reactive subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Raşit Bardakçı, Merve Şahin Can\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039488.2024.2374416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify early maladaptive schemas in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to determine the use of these schemas in OCD autogenous and reactive subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population included 40 healthy volunteers, and 90 patients diagnosed with OCD. The Yale-Brown Obsession-Compulsion Scale (Y-BOCS) was administered to the OCD group to determine the severity of the disorder, and the Y-BOCS Symptom Checklist was applied to determine the patients with autogenous (<i>n</i> = 37) and reactive (<i>n</i> = 53) subtypes of OCD. Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3 (YSQ-SF3) scales were applied to all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When autogenous and reactive subtype groups of OCD were compared with each other, the schema domains of disconnection (<i>p</i> = 0.004), high standards (<i>p</i> = 0.008), other-directedness (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the schema dimensions of failure (<i>p</i> < 0.001), emotional deprivation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), defectiveness (<i>p</i> = 0.007), approval seeking (<i>p</i> = 0.007) and punishment (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were found to be more dominant in the autogenous group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of the study support that there are differences between autogenous and reactive subtypes of OCD in terms of dominant schemas. Therefore, its thought that the use of Schema Therapy methods in which schemas appropriate for subtypes are investigated in the treatment of OCD patients will contribute favorably to the treatment response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"541-547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2374416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2374416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在确定强迫症(OCD)患者的早期适应不良图式,并确定这些图式在强迫症自体亚型和反应亚型中的使用情况:研究对象包括 40 名健康志愿者和 90 名确诊为强迫症的患者。强迫症组采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)来确定强迫症的严重程度,强迫症自发亚型(37 人)和反应亚型(53 人)患者则采用 Y-BOCS 症状清单来确定。所有参与者都使用了Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3(YSQ-SF3)量表:结果:当强迫症的自体亚型和反应亚型群体相互比较时,发现自体亚型群体在断裂(p = 0.004)、高标准(p = 0.008)、他人导向(p p p p = 0.007)、寻求认同(p = 0.007)和惩罚(p = 0.001)等模式域中更占优势:研究结果表明,强迫症的自源性亚型和反应性亚型在主导图式方面存在差异。因此,我们认为,在治疗强迫症患者时,采用图式疗法的方法,研究适合亚型的图式,将有助于提高治疗效果。
Early maladaptive schemas in autogenous and reactive subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Aims: The aim of this study is to identify early maladaptive schemas in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to determine the use of these schemas in OCD autogenous and reactive subtypes.
Methods: The study population included 40 healthy volunteers, and 90 patients diagnosed with OCD. The Yale-Brown Obsession-Compulsion Scale (Y-BOCS) was administered to the OCD group to determine the severity of the disorder, and the Y-BOCS Symptom Checklist was applied to determine the patients with autogenous (n = 37) and reactive (n = 53) subtypes of OCD. Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3 (YSQ-SF3) scales were applied to all participants.
Results: When autogenous and reactive subtype groups of OCD were compared with each other, the schema domains of disconnection (p = 0.004), high standards (p = 0.008), other-directedness (p < 0.001) and the schema dimensions of failure (p < 0.001), emotional deprivation (p < 0.001), defectiveness (p = 0.007), approval seeking (p = 0.007) and punishment (p = 0.001) were found to be more dominant in the autogenous group.
Conclusions: The findings of the study support that there are differences between autogenous and reactive subtypes of OCD in terms of dominant schemas. Therefore, its thought that the use of Schema Therapy methods in which schemas appropriate for subtypes are investigated in the treatment of OCD patients will contribute favorably to the treatment response.
期刊介绍:
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry.
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including:
Child psychiatry
Adult psychiatry
Psychotherapy
Pharmacotherapy
Social psychiatry
Psychosomatic medicine
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.