Yi Xiang Tay, Shane Foley, Ronan Killeen, Marcus E H Ong, Robert Chun Chen, Lai Peng Chan, May San Mak, Jonathan P McNulty
{"title":"影像学转诊指南对患者和放射科服务的影响和效果:系统回顾。","authors":"Yi Xiang Tay, Shane Foley, Ronan Killeen, Marcus E H Ong, Robert Chun Chen, Lai Peng Chan, May San Mak, Jonathan P McNulty","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10938-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to offer a comprehensive overview and explore the associated outcomes from imaging referral guidelines on various key stakeholders, such as patients and radiologists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to retrieve citations published between 2013 and 2023. The search was constructed using medical subject headings and keywords. Only full-text articles and reviews written in English were included. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken for the selected articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 4384 records. Following the abstract, full-text screening, and removal of duplication, 31 studies of varying levels of quality were included in the final analysis. Imaging referral guidelines from the American College of Radiology were most commonly used. Clinical decision support systems were the most evaluated mode of intervention, either integrated or standalone. Interventions showed reduced patient radiation doses and waiting times for imaging. There was a general reduction in radiology workload and utilisation of diagnostic imaging. Low-value imaging utilisation decreased with an increase in the appropriateness of imaging referrals and ratings and cost savings. Clinical effectiveness was maintained during the intervention period without notable adverse consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using evidence-based imaging referral guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Imaging referral guidelines are one essential component of improving the value of radiology in the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>There is a need for broader dissemination of imaging referral guidelines to healthcare providers globally in tandem with the harmonisation of the application of these guidelines to improve the overall value of radiology within the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The application of imaging referral guidelines has an impact and effect on patients, radiologists, and health policymakers. The adoption of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practice can impact healthcare costs and improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Implementing imaging referral guidelines contributes to the attainment of value-based radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"532-541"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact and effect of imaging referral guidelines on patients and radiology services: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Xiang Tay, Shane Foley, Ronan Killeen, Marcus E H Ong, Robert Chun Chen, Lai Peng Chan, May San Mak, Jonathan P McNulty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-10938-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to offer a comprehensive overview and explore the associated outcomes from imaging referral guidelines on various key stakeholders, such as patients and radiologists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to retrieve citations published between 2013 and 2023. The search was constructed using medical subject headings and keywords. Only full-text articles and reviews written in English were included. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken for the selected articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 4384 records. Following the abstract, full-text screening, and removal of duplication, 31 studies of varying levels of quality were included in the final analysis. Imaging referral guidelines from the American College of Radiology were most commonly used. Clinical decision support systems were the most evaluated mode of intervention, either integrated or standalone. Interventions showed reduced patient radiation doses and waiting times for imaging. There was a general reduction in radiology workload and utilisation of diagnostic imaging. Low-value imaging utilisation decreased with an increase in the appropriateness of imaging referrals and ratings and cost savings. Clinical effectiveness was maintained during the intervention period without notable adverse consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using evidence-based imaging referral guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Imaging referral guidelines are one essential component of improving the value of radiology in the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>There is a need for broader dissemination of imaging referral guidelines to healthcare providers globally in tandem with the harmonisation of the application of these guidelines to improve the overall value of radiology within the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The application of imaging referral guidelines has an impact and effect on patients, radiologists, and health policymakers. The adoption of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practice can impact healthcare costs and improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Implementing imaging referral guidelines contributes to the attainment of value-based radiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"532-541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10938-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10938-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本系统综述旨在全面概述和探讨影像学转诊指南对患者和放射科医生等各主要利益相关者产生的相关结果:在 Medline、Embase 和 Web of Science 中进行电子数据库搜索,检索 2013 年至 2023 年间发表的引文。检索使用医学主题词和关键词。只收录英文全文和综述。采用混合方法评估工具对收录论文的质量进行了评估。对所选文章进行了叙述性综合:结果:检索共获得 4384 条记录。经过摘要、全文筛选和去除重复内容后,31 篇不同质量水平的研究被纳入最终分析。最常用的是美国放射学会的成像转诊指南。临床决策支持系统是接受评估最多的干预方式,既有集成式的,也有独立式的。干预措施减少了患者的辐射剂量和成像等待时间。放射科的工作量和诊断成像的使用率普遍降低。低价值成像的使用率有所下降,成像转诊的适当性和评级也有所提高,并节约了成本。临床效果在干预期间得以保持,没有出现明显的不良后果:结论:使用循证影像转诊指南可提高医疗质量和效果,同时降低医疗成本。成像转诊指南是提高医疗系统中放射学价值的重要组成部分:临床相关性声明:有必要在全球范围内向医疗服务提供者更广泛地传播影像学转诊指南,同时协调这些指南的应用,以提高医疗系统中放射学的整体价值:影像学转诊指南的应用对患者、放射科医生和卫生政策制定者都有影响和作用。在临床实践中采用影像学转诊指南可影响医疗成本,提高医疗质量和效果。实施影像学转诊指南有助于实现以价值为基础的放射学。
Impact and effect of imaging referral guidelines on patients and radiology services: a systematic review.
Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to offer a comprehensive overview and explore the associated outcomes from imaging referral guidelines on various key stakeholders, such as patients and radiologists.
Materials and methods: An electronic database search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to retrieve citations published between 2013 and 2023. The search was constructed using medical subject headings and keywords. Only full-text articles and reviews written in English were included. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken for the selected articles.
Results: The search yielded 4384 records. Following the abstract, full-text screening, and removal of duplication, 31 studies of varying levels of quality were included in the final analysis. Imaging referral guidelines from the American College of Radiology were most commonly used. Clinical decision support systems were the most evaluated mode of intervention, either integrated or standalone. Interventions showed reduced patient radiation doses and waiting times for imaging. There was a general reduction in radiology workload and utilisation of diagnostic imaging. Low-value imaging utilisation decreased with an increase in the appropriateness of imaging referrals and ratings and cost savings. Clinical effectiveness was maintained during the intervention period without notable adverse consequences.
Conclusion: Using evidence-based imaging referral guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Imaging referral guidelines are one essential component of improving the value of radiology in the healthcare system.
Clinical relevance statement: There is a need for broader dissemination of imaging referral guidelines to healthcare providers globally in tandem with the harmonisation of the application of these guidelines to improve the overall value of radiology within the healthcare system.
Key points: The application of imaging referral guidelines has an impact and effect on patients, radiologists, and health policymakers. The adoption of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practice can impact healthcare costs and improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Implementing imaging referral guidelines contributes to the attainment of value-based radiology.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.