关于评估基于光敏血压计的血压评估算法的建议。

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mohamed Elgendi, Fridolin Haugg, Richard Ribon Fletcher, John Allen, Hangsik Shin, Aymen Alian, Carlo Menon
{"title":"关于评估基于光敏血压计的血压评估算法的建议。","authors":"Mohamed Elgendi, Fridolin Haugg, Richard Ribon Fletcher, John Allen, Hangsik Shin, Aymen Alian, Carlo Menon","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00555-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures changes in blood volume in the microvascular tissue bed of the body. While it shows potential as a clinical tool for blood pressure (BP) assessment and hypertension management, several sources of error can affect its performance. One such source is the PPG-based algorithm, which can lead to measurement bias and inaccuracy. Here, we review seven widely used measures to assess PPG-based algorithm performance and recommend implementing standardized error evaluation steps in their development. This standardization can reduce bias and improve the reliability and accuracy of PPG-based BP estimation, leading to better health outcomes for patients managing hypertension. Elgendi et al. discuss pros and cons of seven measures to assess photoplethysmography-based algorithm performance for blood pressure estimation. They highlight the need for standardized error evaluation to enhance accuracy and reliability in hypertension management and make recommendations to achieve this goal.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for evaluating photoplethysmography-based algorithms for blood pressure assessment\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Elgendi, Fridolin Haugg, Richard Ribon Fletcher, John Allen, Hangsik Shin, Aymen Alian, Carlo Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-024-00555-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures changes in blood volume in the microvascular tissue bed of the body. While it shows potential as a clinical tool for blood pressure (BP) assessment and hypertension management, several sources of error can affect its performance. One such source is the PPG-based algorithm, which can lead to measurement bias and inaccuracy. Here, we review seven widely used measures to assess PPG-based algorithm performance and recommend implementing standardized error evaluation steps in their development. This standardization can reduce bias and improve the reliability and accuracy of PPG-based BP estimation, leading to better health outcomes for patients managing hypertension. Elgendi et al. discuss pros and cons of seven measures to assess photoplethysmography-based algorithm performance for blood pressure estimation. They highlight the need for standardized error evaluation to enhance accuracy and reliability in hypertension management and make recommendations to achieve this goal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00555-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光电血压计(PPG)是一种无创光学技术,可测量人体微血管组织床的血容量变化。虽然它在血压(BP)评估和高血压管理方面显示出作为临床工具的潜力,但有几个误差源会影响其性能。其中之一就是基于 PPG 的算法,它会导致测量偏差和不准确。在此,我们回顾了七种广泛使用的评估基于 PPG 算法性能的方法,并建议在其开发过程中实施标准化的误差评估步骤。这种标准化可以减少偏差,提高基于 PPG 的血压估算的可靠性和准确性,从而为高血压患者带来更好的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Recommendations for evaluating photoplethysmography-based algorithms for blood pressure assessment

Recommendations for evaluating photoplethysmography-based algorithms for blood pressure assessment
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures changes in blood volume in the microvascular tissue bed of the body. While it shows potential as a clinical tool for blood pressure (BP) assessment and hypertension management, several sources of error can affect its performance. One such source is the PPG-based algorithm, which can lead to measurement bias and inaccuracy. Here, we review seven widely used measures to assess PPG-based algorithm performance and recommend implementing standardized error evaluation steps in their development. This standardization can reduce bias and improve the reliability and accuracy of PPG-based BP estimation, leading to better health outcomes for patients managing hypertension. Elgendi et al. discuss pros and cons of seven measures to assess photoplethysmography-based algorithm performance for blood pressure estimation. They highlight the need for standardized error evaluation to enhance accuracy and reliability in hypertension management and make recommendations to achieve this goal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信