自我诱导认知恍惚时的呼吸生理探索。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
{"title":"自我诱导认知恍惚时的呼吸生理探索。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and methods</h3><p>Little is known about self-induced cognitive trance (SICT) on respiratory function. The aims of this prospective, single-center, non-randomized, open-label study of healthy volunteers, were to characterize spirometry changes during SICT, confirm the safety of this technique, and investigate the potential clinical benefits of SICT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine people participated. There were no significant difference in FEV1 FVC or FEF 25–75 before, during, and after SICT. There were significant improvements in grip strength during SICT (+2.2 kg/5.7 %, p&lt;0.05) and in self-efficacy score related to physical activity at the end of the trance. One participant had a significant worsening of FEV1 during SICT in the context of a recent upper airway infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SICT does not significantly modify spirometry data in healthy volunteers and can improve self-efficacy related to physical activity. SICT should probably be performed with caution during upper airway infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 104301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory physiological exploration during self-induced cognitive trance\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and methods</h3><p>Little is known about self-induced cognitive trance (SICT) on respiratory function. The aims of this prospective, single-center, non-randomized, open-label study of healthy volunteers, were to characterize spirometry changes during SICT, confirm the safety of this technique, and investigate the potential clinical benefits of SICT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine people participated. There were no significant difference in FEV1 FVC or FEF 25–75 before, during, and after SICT. There were significant improvements in grip strength during SICT (+2.2 kg/5.7 %, p&lt;0.05) and in self-efficacy score related to physical activity at the end of the trance. One participant had a significant worsening of FEV1 during SICT in the context of a recent upper airway infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SICT does not significantly modify spirometry data in healthy volunteers and can improve self-efficacy related to physical activity. SICT should probably be performed with caution during upper airway infections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"327 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和方法:人们对自我诱导认知恍惚(SICT)对呼吸功能的影响知之甚少。这项针对健康志愿者的前瞻性、单中心、非随机、开放标签研究的目的是描述 SICT 过程中肺活量的变化,确认这种技术的安全性,并调查 SICT 的潜在临床益处:结果:9 人参加了研究。在 SICT 之前、期间和之后,FEV1 FVC 或 FEF 25-75 均无明显差异。在 SICT 期间,握力有了明显改善(+2.2 千克/5.7%,p):SICT不会明显改变健康志愿者的肺活量数据,并能提高与体育锻炼相关的自我效能感。在上呼吸道感染期间进行 SICT 可能需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Respiratory physiological exploration during self-induced cognitive trance

Background and methods

Little is known about self-induced cognitive trance (SICT) on respiratory function. The aims of this prospective, single-center, non-randomized, open-label study of healthy volunteers, were to characterize spirometry changes during SICT, confirm the safety of this technique, and investigate the potential clinical benefits of SICT.

Results

Nine people participated. There were no significant difference in FEV1 FVC or FEF 25–75 before, during, and after SICT. There were significant improvements in grip strength during SICT (+2.2 kg/5.7 %, p<0.05) and in self-efficacy score related to physical activity at the end of the trance. One participant had a significant worsening of FEV1 during SICT in the context of a recent upper airway infection.

Conclusion

SICT does not significantly modify spirometry data in healthy volunteers and can improve self-efficacy related to physical activity. SICT should probably be performed with caution during upper airway infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信