消融学徒及其首次使用不同鞘管对阵发性心房颤动进行肺静脉隔离术的经验。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ye Liu, Jingjing Song, Siyu Wang, Lifeng Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Zheng Liu, Yuxing Wang, Lei Zhao, Xinchun Yang
{"title":"消融学徒及其首次使用不同鞘管对阵发性心房颤动进行肺静脉隔离术的经验。","authors":"Ye Liu, Jingjing Song, Siyu Wang, Lifeng Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Zheng Liu, Yuxing Wang, Lei Zhao, Xinchun Yang","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-02826-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed at exploring how using different kinds of sheaths will affect the very first ablation procedure of apprentices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized to used fixed-curve, conventional steerable or visualized steerable sheath, and received complete isolation of pulmonary veins. All ablations were the very first procedure performed by 15 ablation apprentices. The use of fluoroscopy and catheter stability during the PVI were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedure duration was much longer in the fixed-curve group (116.8 ± 27 vs. 62.2 ± 17 vs. 60.4 ± 17, p < 0.001). X-ray exposure was lowest with visualized sheath (17.6 ± 5 vs. 18.6 ± 6 vs. 5.2 ± 6, p < 0.001). CF SD differed significantly, especially at the anterior aspect of LSPV (7.90 ± 2.90 vs. 5.04 ± 2.18 vs. 4.52 ± 2.40, p < 0.001) and posterior aspect of RSPV (6.84 ± 2.79 vs. 3.42 ± 2.04 vs. 3.50 ± 2.30, p < 0.001) in the fixed-curve group. Impedance drop was significantly smaller in the fixed-curve group at the anterior aspect of LSPV (8.74 ± 3.02 vs. 11.49 ± 5.48 vs. 12.57 ± 5.96, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even for the very first ablation procedure of an ablation apprentice, the use of steerable sheaths will significantly reduce the procedure duration and improve the catheter stability, but only visualized steerable sheath can reduce fluoroscopic time.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ablation apprentices and their first experience of pulmonary vein isolation procedure on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with different sheaths.\",\"authors\":\"Ye Liu, Jingjing Song, Siyu Wang, Lifeng Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Zheng Liu, Yuxing Wang, Lei Zhao, Xinchun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-024-02826-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed at exploring how using different kinds of sheaths will affect the very first ablation procedure of apprentices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized to used fixed-curve, conventional steerable or visualized steerable sheath, and received complete isolation of pulmonary veins. All ablations were the very first procedure performed by 15 ablation apprentices. The use of fluoroscopy and catheter stability during the PVI were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedure duration was much longer in the fixed-curve group (116.8 ± 27 vs. 62.2 ± 17 vs. 60.4 ± 17, p < 0.001). X-ray exposure was lowest with visualized sheath (17.6 ± 5 vs. 18.6 ± 6 vs. 5.2 ± 6, p < 0.001). CF SD differed significantly, especially at the anterior aspect of LSPV (7.90 ± 2.90 vs. 5.04 ± 2.18 vs. 4.52 ± 2.40, p < 0.001) and posterior aspect of RSPV (6.84 ± 2.79 vs. 3.42 ± 2.04 vs. 3.50 ± 2.30, p < 0.001) in the fixed-curve group. Impedance drop was significantly smaller in the fixed-curve group at the anterior aspect of LSPV (8.74 ± 3.02 vs. 11.49 ± 5.48 vs. 12.57 ± 5.96, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even for the very first ablation procedure of an ablation apprentice, the use of steerable sheaths will significantly reduce the procedure duration and improve the catheter stability, but only visualized steerable sheath can reduce fluoroscopic time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245845/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02826-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02826-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的方法:15 名阵发性心房颤动患者被随机分配使用固定曲线、传统可转向或可视化可转向鞘,并接受完全的肺静脉隔离。所有消融手术均由 15 名消融学徒首次实施。我们分析了 PVI 过程中透视的使用和导管的稳定性:结果:固定曲线组的手术时间更长(116.8 ± 27 vs. 62.2 ± 17 vs. 60.4 ± 17,P 结论:即使是首次消融手术,固定曲线组的手术时间也更长(116.8 ± 27 vs. 62.2 ± 17 vs. 60.4 ± 17,P 结论):即使是消融学徒的首次消融手术,使用可转向鞘管也能显著缩短手术时间并提高导管稳定性,但只有可视可转向鞘管才能缩短透视时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ablation apprentices and their first experience of pulmonary vein isolation procedure on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with different sheaths.

Objectives: This study aimed at exploring how using different kinds of sheaths will affect the very first ablation procedure of apprentices.

Methods: 15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized to used fixed-curve, conventional steerable or visualized steerable sheath, and received complete isolation of pulmonary veins. All ablations were the very first procedure performed by 15 ablation apprentices. The use of fluoroscopy and catheter stability during the PVI were analyzed.

Results: Procedure duration was much longer in the fixed-curve group (116.8 ± 27 vs. 62.2 ± 17 vs. 60.4 ± 17, p < 0.001). X-ray exposure was lowest with visualized sheath (17.6 ± 5 vs. 18.6 ± 6 vs. 5.2 ± 6, p < 0.001). CF SD differed significantly, especially at the anterior aspect of LSPV (7.90 ± 2.90 vs. 5.04 ± 2.18 vs. 4.52 ± 2.40, p < 0.001) and posterior aspect of RSPV (6.84 ± 2.79 vs. 3.42 ± 2.04 vs. 3.50 ± 2.30, p < 0.001) in the fixed-curve group. Impedance drop was significantly smaller in the fixed-curve group at the anterior aspect of LSPV (8.74 ± 3.02 vs. 11.49 ± 5.48 vs. 12.57 ± 5.96, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Even for the very first ablation procedure of an ablation apprentice, the use of steerable sheaths will significantly reduce the procedure duration and improve the catheter stability, but only visualized steerable sheath can reduce fluoroscopic time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信