全球导航卫星系统对欧洲陆地垂直运动的敏感性:地球物理负载和共模误差的影响

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Roland Hohensinn, Pia Ruttner, Yehuda Bock
{"title":"全球导航卫星系统对欧洲陆地垂直运动的敏感性:地球物理负载和共模误差的影响","authors":"Roland Hohensinn, Pia Ruttner, Yehuda Bock","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We perform a statistical sensitivity analysis on a parametric fit to vertical daily displacement time series of 244 European Permanent GNSS stations, with a focus on linear vertical land motion (VLM), i.e., station velocity. We compare two independent corrections to the raw (uncorrected) observed displacements. The first correction is physical and accounts for non-tidal atmospheric, non-tidal oceanic and hydrological loading displacements, while the second approach is an empirical correction for the common-mode errors. For the uncorrected case, we show that combining power-law and white noise stochastic models with autoregressive models yields adequate noise approximations. With this as a realistic baseline, we report improvement rates of about 14% to 24% in station velocity sensitivity, after corrections are applied. We analyze the choice of the stochastic models in detail and outline potential discrepancies between the GNSS-observed displacements and those predicted by the loading models. Furthermore, we apply restricted maximum likelihood estimation (RMLE), to remove low-frequency noise biases, which yields more reliable velocity uncertainty estimates. RMLE reveals that for a number of stations noise is best modeled by a combination of random walk, flicker noise, and white noise. The sensitivity analysis yields minimum detectable VLM parameters (linear velocities, seasonal periodic motions, and offsets), which are of interest for geophysical applications of GNSS, such as tectonic or hydrological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of GNSS to vertical land motion over Europe: effects of geophysical loadings and common-mode errors\",\"authors\":\"Roland Hohensinn, Pia Ruttner, Yehuda Bock\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We perform a statistical sensitivity analysis on a parametric fit to vertical daily displacement time series of 244 European Permanent GNSS stations, with a focus on linear vertical land motion (VLM), i.e., station velocity. We compare two independent corrections to the raw (uncorrected) observed displacements. The first correction is physical and accounts for non-tidal atmospheric, non-tidal oceanic and hydrological loading displacements, while the second approach is an empirical correction for the common-mode errors. For the uncorrected case, we show that combining power-law and white noise stochastic models with autoregressive models yields adequate noise approximations. With this as a realistic baseline, we report improvement rates of about 14% to 24% in station velocity sensitivity, after corrections are applied. We analyze the choice of the stochastic models in detail and outline potential discrepancies between the GNSS-observed displacements and those predicted by the loading models. Furthermore, we apply restricted maximum likelihood estimation (RMLE), to remove low-frequency noise biases, which yields more reliable velocity uncertainty estimates. RMLE reveals that for a number of stations noise is best modeled by a combination of random walk, flicker noise, and white noise. The sensitivity analysis yields minimum detectable VLM parameters (linear velocities, seasonal periodic motions, and offsets), which are of interest for geophysical applications of GNSS, such as tectonic or hydrological studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对 244 个欧洲永久性全球导航卫星系统台站的垂直日位移时间序列的参数拟合进行了统计敏感性分析,重点是线性垂直陆地运动(VLM),即台站速度。我们比较了对原始(未修正)观测位移的两种独立修正。第一种校正是物理校正,考虑了非潮汐大气、非潮汐海洋和水文负荷位移,第二种方法是对共模误差的经验校正。对于未修正的情况,我们表明,将幂律和白噪声随机模型与自回归模型相结合,可以得到足够的噪声近似值。以此为现实基线,我们报告说,在应用校正后,台站速度灵敏度提高了约 14% 至 24%。我们详细分析了随机模型的选择,并概述了全球导航卫星系统观测到的位移与加载模型预测的位移之间可能存在的差异。此外,我们应用受限最大似然估计(RMLE)来消除低频噪声偏差,从而获得更可靠的速度不确定性估计值。RMLE 发现,对于一些站点,噪声最好由随机漫步、闪烁噪声和白噪声组合建模。灵敏度分析得出了可探测到的最小 VLM 参数(线性速度、季节性周期运动和偏移),这对全球导航卫星系统的地球物理应用(如构造或水文研究)很有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sensitivity of GNSS to vertical land motion over Europe: effects of geophysical loadings and common-mode errors

Sensitivity of GNSS to vertical land motion over Europe: effects of geophysical loadings and common-mode errors

We perform a statistical sensitivity analysis on a parametric fit to vertical daily displacement time series of 244 European Permanent GNSS stations, with a focus on linear vertical land motion (VLM), i.e., station velocity. We compare two independent corrections to the raw (uncorrected) observed displacements. The first correction is physical and accounts for non-tidal atmospheric, non-tidal oceanic and hydrological loading displacements, while the second approach is an empirical correction for the common-mode errors. For the uncorrected case, we show that combining power-law and white noise stochastic models with autoregressive models yields adequate noise approximations. With this as a realistic baseline, we report improvement rates of about 14% to 24% in station velocity sensitivity, after corrections are applied. We analyze the choice of the stochastic models in detail and outline potential discrepancies between the GNSS-observed displacements and those predicted by the loading models. Furthermore, we apply restricted maximum likelihood estimation (RMLE), to remove low-frequency noise biases, which yields more reliable velocity uncertainty estimates. RMLE reveals that for a number of stations noise is best modeled by a combination of random walk, flicker noise, and white noise. The sensitivity analysis yields minimum detectable VLM parameters (linear velocities, seasonal periodic motions, and offsets), which are of interest for geophysical applications of GNSS, such as tectonic or hydrological studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信