两类陆生蜗牛(polygyra spp.和 euglandina rosea)作为美国佛罗里达州土著贝丘和贝冢放射性碳年代测定源材料的潜力和局限性

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY
Thomas J. Pluckhahn , Jaime A. Rogers , Carla S. Hadden , Kendal Jackson , Victor D. Thompson , Carey J. Garland
{"title":"两类陆生蜗牛(polygyra spp.和 euglandina rosea)作为美国佛罗里达州土著贝丘和贝冢放射性碳年代测定源材料的潜力和局限性","authors":"Thomas J. Pluckhahn ,&nbsp;Jaime A. Rogers ,&nbsp;Carla S. Hadden ,&nbsp;Kendal Jackson ,&nbsp;Victor D. Thompson ,&nbsp;Carey J. Garland","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preferred materials for radiocarbon dating are often rare on coastal archaeological sites, leading many archaeologists to date more common and abundant marine shells. But marine shell is often difficult to reliably radiocarbon date owing to the effects of the marine reservoir effect, especially where local environmental factors such as hardwater and limestone substrates complicate corrections. Terrestrial gastropods provide a potential alternative material for radiocarbon dating, although they are variably impacted by the same environmental factors and thus require testing to determine their reliability for dating archaeological deposits. We compare radiocarbon dating results from paired archaeological samples of wood charcoal and <em>Odocoileus virginianus</em> (white-tailed deer) bone with the shells of two terrestrial snail taxa—<em>Polygyra</em> spp. (flat coil snails) and <em>Euglandina rosea</em> (rosy wolf snails)—from the Cockroach Key archaeological site, in Tampa Bay, an open-water estuary on the western coast of the Florida Peninsula, USA. In one-third of the total 12 pairings, we found no statistically significant difference at the 95% probability level. For the other pairings, differences between snail shell dates and the reference dates ranged from decades to several centuries. Overall, our results suggest that both taxa have the potential to yield reliable radiocarbon dates, although not without complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potentials and limitations of two taxa of terrestrial snails (polygyra spp. And euglandina rosea) as a source material for the radiocarbon dating of indigenous shell mounds and middens in florida, usa\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Pluckhahn ,&nbsp;Jaime A. Rogers ,&nbsp;Carla S. Hadden ,&nbsp;Kendal Jackson ,&nbsp;Victor D. Thompson ,&nbsp;Carey J. Garland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Preferred materials for radiocarbon dating are often rare on coastal archaeological sites, leading many archaeologists to date more common and abundant marine shells. But marine shell is often difficult to reliably radiocarbon date owing to the effects of the marine reservoir effect, especially where local environmental factors such as hardwater and limestone substrates complicate corrections. Terrestrial gastropods provide a potential alternative material for radiocarbon dating, although they are variably impacted by the same environmental factors and thus require testing to determine their reliability for dating archaeological deposits. We compare radiocarbon dating results from paired archaeological samples of wood charcoal and <em>Odocoileus virginianus</em> (white-tailed deer) bone with the shells of two terrestrial snail taxa—<em>Polygyra</em> spp. (flat coil snails) and <em>Euglandina rosea</em> (rosy wolf snails)—from the Cockroach Key archaeological site, in Tampa Bay, an open-water estuary on the western coast of the Florida Peninsula, USA. In one-third of the total 12 pairings, we found no statistically significant difference at the 95% probability level. For the other pairings, differences between snail shell dates and the reference dates ranged from decades to several centuries. Overall, our results suggest that both taxa have the potential to yield reliable radiocarbon dates, although not without complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在沿海考古遗址中,用于放射性碳测年的首选材料往往很少见,这导致许多考古学家选择更为常见和丰富的海洋贝壳作为测年材料。但是,由于海洋储层效应的影响,海洋贝壳往往难以可靠地进行放射性碳测年,特别是在当地环境因素(如硬水和石灰岩基质)使校正复杂化的情况下。陆生腹足类动物为放射性碳测年提供了一种潜在的替代材料,不过它们也会受到相同环境因素的不同影响,因此需要进行测试,以确定它们对考古沉积物进行测年的可靠性。我们比较了来自美国佛罗里达半岛西海岸坦帕湾开放水域河口的蟑螂礁(Cockroach Key)考古遗址的木炭和白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)骨骼考古样本与两个陆生蜗牛类群--Polygyra spp.(扁平卷螺)和 Euglandina rosea(玫瑰色狼螺)--外壳的放射性碳测年结果。在总共 12 对配对中,有三分之一的配对在 95% 的概率水平上没有发现显著的统计学差异。在其他配对中,蜗牛壳的年代与参考年代之间的差异从几十年到几个世纪不等。总之,我们的研究结果表明,这两个类群都有可能产生可靠的放射性碳年代,尽管并非没有复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The potentials and limitations of two taxa of terrestrial snails (polygyra spp. And euglandina rosea) as a source material for the radiocarbon dating of indigenous shell mounds and middens in florida, usa

Preferred materials for radiocarbon dating are often rare on coastal archaeological sites, leading many archaeologists to date more common and abundant marine shells. But marine shell is often difficult to reliably radiocarbon date owing to the effects of the marine reservoir effect, especially where local environmental factors such as hardwater and limestone substrates complicate corrections. Terrestrial gastropods provide a potential alternative material for radiocarbon dating, although they are variably impacted by the same environmental factors and thus require testing to determine their reliability for dating archaeological deposits. We compare radiocarbon dating results from paired archaeological samples of wood charcoal and Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer) bone with the shells of two terrestrial snail taxa—Polygyra spp. (flat coil snails) and Euglandina rosea (rosy wolf snails)—from the Cockroach Key archaeological site, in Tampa Bay, an open-water estuary on the western coast of the Florida Peninsula, USA. In one-third of the total 12 pairings, we found no statistically significant difference at the 95% probability level. For the other pairings, differences between snail shell dates and the reference dates ranged from decades to several centuries. Overall, our results suggest that both taxa have the potential to yield reliable radiocarbon dates, although not without complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信