以自然为基础的防洪盐沼:沉积物类型、排水系统和植被推动了坚固沉积床的形成

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Marte M. Stoorvogel , Jim van Belzen , Stijn Temmerman , Lauren E. Wiesebron , Gregory S. Fivash , Lennart van IJzerloo , Johan van de Koppel , Tjeerd J. Bouma
{"title":"以自然为基础的防洪盐沼:沉积物类型、排水系统和植被推动了坚固沉积床的形成","authors":"Marte M. Stoorvogel ,&nbsp;Jim van Belzen ,&nbsp;Stijn Temmerman ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Wiesebron ,&nbsp;Gregory S. Fivash ,&nbsp;Lennart van IJzerloo ,&nbsp;Johan van de Koppel ,&nbsp;Tjeerd J. Bouma","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In face of sea-level rise and increasing risks for storm impacts on shorelines, there is a growing demand for developing nature-based flood defenses, for example by restoring or creating salt marshes in front of engineered structures such as dikes. However, salt marshes can only optimally provide flood defense if their sediment beds are erosion resistant, even under very high flow velocities. It remains unknown how fast sediment strength develops in marshes restored or created for nature-based flood defense. Therefore, this study investigated how 1) sediment type, 2) tidal drainage depth and duration, and 3) pioneer vegetation species drive the development rate of sediment strength. A controlled experiment was set up with pots filled with two sediment types, which were either left bare or planted with <em>Spartina anglica</em> or <em>Scirpus maritimus</em>, two dominant salt marsh pioneers in NW Europe. All treatments were subjected to four different tidal regimes with different tidal drainage depth and duration. The results showed that sandy mud (with a 37% silt and clay fraction) led to much stronger sediments than fine mud (with a 77% silt and clay fraction). Sediment strength was higher in the treatments with deeper tidal drainage depth and longer drainage duration. The presence of vegetation increased sediment strength and this effect was stronger with <em>Scirpus maritimus</em> than with <em>Spartina anglica</em>. Plant roots increased sediment strength directly, and the presence of vegetation also seemed to increase sediment strength through enhanced evaporation and transpiration. From these results it can be concluded that to restore or create erosion resistant salt marshes for flood defense, it is essential to ensure that marshes can form at relatively high elevations from well-draining sand-mud mixtures, thereby also ensuring vegetation growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107335"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001605/pdfft?md5=afb9ce09b33ef1b71feea56ef0fc57a7&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001605-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salt marshes for nature-based flood defense: Sediment type, drainage, and vegetation drive the development of strong sediment beds\",\"authors\":\"Marte M. Stoorvogel ,&nbsp;Jim van Belzen ,&nbsp;Stijn Temmerman ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Wiesebron ,&nbsp;Gregory S. Fivash ,&nbsp;Lennart van IJzerloo ,&nbsp;Johan van de Koppel ,&nbsp;Tjeerd J. Bouma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In face of sea-level rise and increasing risks for storm impacts on shorelines, there is a growing demand for developing nature-based flood defenses, for example by restoring or creating salt marshes in front of engineered structures such as dikes. However, salt marshes can only optimally provide flood defense if their sediment beds are erosion resistant, even under very high flow velocities. It remains unknown how fast sediment strength develops in marshes restored or created for nature-based flood defense. Therefore, this study investigated how 1) sediment type, 2) tidal drainage depth and duration, and 3) pioneer vegetation species drive the development rate of sediment strength. A controlled experiment was set up with pots filled with two sediment types, which were either left bare or planted with <em>Spartina anglica</em> or <em>Scirpus maritimus</em>, two dominant salt marsh pioneers in NW Europe. All treatments were subjected to four different tidal regimes with different tidal drainage depth and duration. The results showed that sandy mud (with a 37% silt and clay fraction) led to much stronger sediments than fine mud (with a 77% silt and clay fraction). Sediment strength was higher in the treatments with deeper tidal drainage depth and longer drainage duration. The presence of vegetation increased sediment strength and this effect was stronger with <em>Scirpus maritimus</em> than with <em>Spartina anglica</em>. Plant roots increased sediment strength directly, and the presence of vegetation also seemed to increase sediment strength through enhanced evaporation and transpiration. From these results it can be concluded that to restore or create erosion resistant salt marshes for flood defense, it is essential to ensure that marshes can form at relatively high elevations from well-draining sand-mud mixtures, thereby also ensuring vegetation growth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001605/pdfft?md5=afb9ce09b33ef1b71feea56ef0fc57a7&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001605-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001605\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对海平面上升和海岸线受风暴影响的风险不断增加,人们越来越需要开发以自然为基础的洪水防御系统,例如在堤坝等工程结构前恢复或创建盐沼。然而,盐沼只有在其沉积床具有抗侵蚀能力的情况下才能提供最佳的洪水防御能力,即使在流速非常高的情况下也是如此。在为自然洪水防御而恢复或创建的沼泽中,沉积物强度的发展速度有多快仍是未知数。因此,本研究调查了 1)沉积物类型;2)潮汐排水深度和持续时间;3)先驱植被物种如何影响沉积物强度的发展速度。研究人员用装满两种沉积物的花盆进行了对照实验,这些沉积物有的裸露,有的种植了欧洲西北部两种主要的盐沼先锋植物--Spartina anglica 或 Scirpus maritimus。所有处理方法均采用四种不同的潮汐制度,潮汐排水深度和持续时间各不相同。结果表明,沙泥(含 37% 的淤泥和粘土)比细泥(含 77% 的淤泥和粘土)产生的沉积物强度大得多。在潮汐排水深度较深和排水时间较长的处理中,沉积物强度较高。植被的存在会增加沉积物强度,Scirpus maritimus 比 Spartina anglica 的效果更明显。植物根系可直接增加沉积物强度,植被的存在似乎也可通过增强蒸发和蒸腾作用增加沉积物强度。从这些结果中可以得出结论,要恢复或建立抗侵蚀的盐沼以防御洪水,必须确保沼泽能在相对较高的海拔高度上由排水良好的沙泥混合物形成,从而确保植被的生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salt marshes for nature-based flood defense: Sediment type, drainage, and vegetation drive the development of strong sediment beds

In face of sea-level rise and increasing risks for storm impacts on shorelines, there is a growing demand for developing nature-based flood defenses, for example by restoring or creating salt marshes in front of engineered structures such as dikes. However, salt marshes can only optimally provide flood defense if their sediment beds are erosion resistant, even under very high flow velocities. It remains unknown how fast sediment strength develops in marshes restored or created for nature-based flood defense. Therefore, this study investigated how 1) sediment type, 2) tidal drainage depth and duration, and 3) pioneer vegetation species drive the development rate of sediment strength. A controlled experiment was set up with pots filled with two sediment types, which were either left bare or planted with Spartina anglica or Scirpus maritimus, two dominant salt marsh pioneers in NW Europe. All treatments were subjected to four different tidal regimes with different tidal drainage depth and duration. The results showed that sandy mud (with a 37% silt and clay fraction) led to much stronger sediments than fine mud (with a 77% silt and clay fraction). Sediment strength was higher in the treatments with deeper tidal drainage depth and longer drainage duration. The presence of vegetation increased sediment strength and this effect was stronger with Scirpus maritimus than with Spartina anglica. Plant roots increased sediment strength directly, and the presence of vegetation also seemed to increase sediment strength through enhanced evaporation and transpiration. From these results it can be concluded that to restore or create erosion resistant salt marshes for flood defense, it is essential to ensure that marshes can form at relatively high elevations from well-draining sand-mud mixtures, thereby also ensuring vegetation growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信