{"title":"利用原始石墨和废旧锂离子电池中回收的石墨合成的还原氧化石墨烯的电化学比较","authors":"Aranganathan Viswanathan, Vanchiappan Aravindan","doi":"10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two reduced graphene oxides (rGO) were synthesized using two carbon sources, namely pristine graphite (rGO-PG), and recovered graphite (rGO-RG) (graphite recovered from spent Li-ion batteries) by modified hummers method and followed by the chemical reduction method to compare their supercapacitive performances. Their supercapacitance is found to be highly competitive and comparable with each other, except for their rate capabilities. The rate capability of rGO-RG is found to be inferior compared to rGO-PG. The supercapacitive behavior of both rGO’s was evaluated using five different aqueous electrolytes. The specific capacitance, specific energy, specific power, and columbic efficiencies exhibited by rGO-RG and rGO-PG were superior in the presence of 1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and are 36 F g<sup><img>1</sup>, 7.1 Wh kg<sup><img>1</sup>, 0.88 kW kg<sup><img>1</sup> and 96.55 %; and 40 F g<sup><img>1</sup>, 7.9 Wh kg<sup><img>1</sup>, 0.66 kW kg<sup><img>1</sup> and 97.36 %, respectively. Both the rGOs exhibited no deterioration in their performance up to 10,000 continuous charge and discharge cycles at a current density of 10 A g<sup><img>1</sup>; rather, they exhibited enhancement in their performances with an increase in charge and discharge cycles. The enhancement exhibited by rGO-RG is superior to that of rGO-PG, which is 844 % (272 F g<sup><img>1</sup>) higher than its initial performance (29 F g<sup><img>1</sup>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100960,"journal":{"name":"Next Sustainability","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949823624000382/pdfft?md5=3f7f049ec69839ddc5a7dfc09742eb76&pid=1-s2.0-S2949823624000382-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The electrochemical comparisons of reduced graphene oxide synthesized from pristine and recovered graphite from spent Li-ion batteries\",\"authors\":\"Aranganathan Viswanathan, Vanchiappan Aravindan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two reduced graphene oxides (rGO) were synthesized using two carbon sources, namely pristine graphite (rGO-PG), and recovered graphite (rGO-RG) (graphite recovered from spent Li-ion batteries) by modified hummers method and followed by the chemical reduction method to compare their supercapacitive performances. Their supercapacitance is found to be highly competitive and comparable with each other, except for their rate capabilities. The rate capability of rGO-RG is found to be inferior compared to rGO-PG. The supercapacitive behavior of both rGO’s was evaluated using five different aqueous electrolytes. The specific capacitance, specific energy, specific power, and columbic efficiencies exhibited by rGO-RG and rGO-PG were superior in the presence of 1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and are 36 F g<sup><img>1</sup>, 7.1 Wh kg<sup><img>1</sup>, 0.88 kW kg<sup><img>1</sup> and 96.55 %; and 40 F g<sup><img>1</sup>, 7.9 Wh kg<sup><img>1</sup>, 0.66 kW kg<sup><img>1</sup> and 97.36 %, respectively. Both the rGOs exhibited no deterioration in their performance up to 10,000 continuous charge and discharge cycles at a current density of 10 A g<sup><img>1</sup>; rather, they exhibited enhancement in their performances with an increase in charge and discharge cycles. The enhancement exhibited by rGO-RG is superior to that of rGO-PG, which is 844 % (272 F g<sup><img>1</sup>) higher than its initial performance (29 F g<sup><img>1</sup>).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Next Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949823624000382/pdfft?md5=3f7f049ec69839ddc5a7dfc09742eb76&pid=1-s2.0-S2949823624000382-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Next Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949823624000382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949823624000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
利用两种碳源,即原始石墨(rGO-PG)和回收石墨(rGO-RG)(从废旧锂离子电池中回收的石墨),采用改良嗡嗡法合成了两种还原石墨烯氧化物(rGO),然后采用化学还原法比较了它们的超级电容性能。结果发现,除了速率能力之外,它们的超级电容具有很强的竞争力,彼此不相上下。与 rGO-PG 相比,rGO-RG 的速率能力较差。使用五种不同的水性电解质对两种 rGO 的超级电容行为进行了评估。在 1 M H2SO4 的存在下,rGO-RG 和 rGO-PG 显示的比电容、比能量、比功率和电容效率都很高,分别为 36 F g1、7.1 Wh kg1、0.88 kW kg1 和 96.55 %;以及 40 F g1、7.9 Wh kg1、0.66 kW kg1 和 97.36 %。在电流密度为 10 A g1 的条件下,这两种 rGO 在连续充放电 10,000 次后性能没有下降;相反,随着充放电次数的增加,它们的性能有所提高。rGO-RG 的性能比 rGO-PG 高出 844 %(272 F g1),高于其初始性能(29 F g1)。
The electrochemical comparisons of reduced graphene oxide synthesized from pristine and recovered graphite from spent Li-ion batteries
Two reduced graphene oxides (rGO) were synthesized using two carbon sources, namely pristine graphite (rGO-PG), and recovered graphite (rGO-RG) (graphite recovered from spent Li-ion batteries) by modified hummers method and followed by the chemical reduction method to compare their supercapacitive performances. Their supercapacitance is found to be highly competitive and comparable with each other, except for their rate capabilities. The rate capability of rGO-RG is found to be inferior compared to rGO-PG. The supercapacitive behavior of both rGO’s was evaluated using five different aqueous electrolytes. The specific capacitance, specific energy, specific power, and columbic efficiencies exhibited by rGO-RG and rGO-PG were superior in the presence of 1 M H2SO4 and are 36 F g1, 7.1 Wh kg1, 0.88 kW kg1 and 96.55 %; and 40 F g1, 7.9 Wh kg1, 0.66 kW kg1 and 97.36 %, respectively. Both the rGOs exhibited no deterioration in their performance up to 10,000 continuous charge and discharge cycles at a current density of 10 A g1; rather, they exhibited enhancement in their performances with an increase in charge and discharge cycles. The enhancement exhibited by rGO-RG is superior to that of rGO-PG, which is 844 % (272 F g1) higher than its initial performance (29 F g1).