分析基金选择措施的本质:选股还是交易技巧?

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ping-Wen Sun, Wen-Ju Liao, Wanling Lin
{"title":"分析基金选择措施的本质:选股还是交易技巧?","authors":"Ping-Wen Sun,&nbsp;Wen-Ju Liao,&nbsp;Wanling Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze why fund selection measures, including daily six factor alpha, daily return volatility, and minimum churn rate of a fund within a quarter, predict fund performance. Among these three fund selection measures, we demonstrate that funds with lower return volatility generate better fund performance, portfolio holdings performance, and trading portfolio performance. This result suggests that funds with lower return volatility possess better both stock picking and trading skill. In addition, funds with higher alpha or higher minimum churn rate have better fund performance and better portfolio holdings performance, but worse trading portfolio performance. As we demonstrate that portfolio holdings performance rather than trading portfolio performance mainly contributes to fund performance, our findings suggest that fund investors should pay attention to funds’ stock picking skill more than their trading skill. Moreover, funds’ lack of trading skill helps explain why original funds may underperform copycat funds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the nature of fund selection measures: Stock picking or trading skill?\",\"authors\":\"Ping-Wen Sun,&nbsp;Wen-Ju Liao,&nbsp;Wanling Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We analyze why fund selection measures, including daily six factor alpha, daily return volatility, and minimum churn rate of a fund within a quarter, predict fund performance. Among these three fund selection measures, we demonstrate that funds with lower return volatility generate better fund performance, portfolio holdings performance, and trading portfolio performance. This result suggests that funds with lower return volatility possess better both stock picking and trading skill. In addition, funds with higher alpha or higher minimum churn rate have better fund performance and better portfolio holdings performance, but worse trading portfolio performance. As we demonstrate that portfolio holdings performance rather than trading portfolio performance mainly contributes to fund performance, our findings suggest that fund investors should pay attention to funds’ stock picking skill more than their trading skill. Moreover, funds’ lack of trading skill helps explain why original funds may underperform copycat funds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000899\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了基金选择指标(包括每日六因子阿尔法、每日回报波动率和季度内基金最低流失率)预测基金业绩的原因。在这三个基金选择指标中,我们发现回报波动率越低的基金,其基金业绩、投资组合持股业绩和交易组合业绩越好。这一结果表明,收益波动性较低的基金拥有更好的选股和交易技巧。此外,阿尔法值越高或最低流失率越高的基金,其基金业绩和投资组合持有业绩越好,但交易组合业绩越差。我们的研究结果表明,投资组合的持股表现而非交易组合的表现是影响基金业绩的主要因素,因此基金投资者应更多地关注基金的选股能力而非交易能力。此外,基金缺乏交易技能也有助于解释为什么原创基金的表现可能不如山寨基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the nature of fund selection measures: Stock picking or trading skill?

We analyze why fund selection measures, including daily six factor alpha, daily return volatility, and minimum churn rate of a fund within a quarter, predict fund performance. Among these three fund selection measures, we demonstrate that funds with lower return volatility generate better fund performance, portfolio holdings performance, and trading portfolio performance. This result suggests that funds with lower return volatility possess better both stock picking and trading skill. In addition, funds with higher alpha or higher minimum churn rate have better fund performance and better portfolio holdings performance, but worse trading portfolio performance. As we demonstrate that portfolio holdings performance rather than trading portfolio performance mainly contributes to fund performance, our findings suggest that fund investors should pay attention to funds’ stock picking skill more than their trading skill. Moreover, funds’ lack of trading skill helps explain why original funds may underperform copycat funds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信