设计和实施欧盟 "绿色交易 "下的生产者延伸责任

Q2 Environmental Science
Pravin Kumar Mallick , Kim Bang Salling , Daniela C.A. Pigosso , Tim C. McAloone
{"title":"设计和实施欧盟 \"绿色交易 \"下的生产者延伸责任","authors":"Pravin Kumar Mallick ,&nbsp;Kim Bang Salling ,&nbsp;Daniela C.A. Pigosso ,&nbsp;Tim C. McAloone","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2024.100977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extended producer responsibility (EPR) as a policy principle has been in practice in different product-country settings for a few decades now, and yet its implementation, as well as the outcomes, have varied. Amid the sustainability crises posed by the take-make-dispose-based linear economy and the transgression of the various planetary boundaries, governments worldwide are increasingly embracing CE-related policies, more so in the EU, with the Green Deal ushering in a wave of legislative transformations. Given this background, there is an urgent need for both policymakers and manufacturers to transition EPR from a mere waste management strategy to what can be termed as an “interface policy”, covering the interdisciplinary areas of circular economy, chemicals and waste law.</p><p>Drawing upon insights from academic and grey literature, this paper contributes to characterising the system architecture underpinning EPR. It develops a conceptual framework using a life cycle thinking process through which EPR can be analysed, agreed upon, and operationalised. Such a conceptual framework can be helpful in governmental bodies tasked with framing effective EPR policies and for industry stakeholders responsible for take-back system design and implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001434/pdfft?md5=189d05e5a20e0e19fc49fd21841e1e12&pid=1-s2.0-S2667010024001434-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and operationalising extended producer responsibility under the EU Green Deal\",\"authors\":\"Pravin Kumar Mallick ,&nbsp;Kim Bang Salling ,&nbsp;Daniela C.A. Pigosso ,&nbsp;Tim C. McAloone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envc.2024.100977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Extended producer responsibility (EPR) as a policy principle has been in practice in different product-country settings for a few decades now, and yet its implementation, as well as the outcomes, have varied. Amid the sustainability crises posed by the take-make-dispose-based linear economy and the transgression of the various planetary boundaries, governments worldwide are increasingly embracing CE-related policies, more so in the EU, with the Green Deal ushering in a wave of legislative transformations. Given this background, there is an urgent need for both policymakers and manufacturers to transition EPR from a mere waste management strategy to what can be termed as an “interface policy”, covering the interdisciplinary areas of circular economy, chemicals and waste law.</p><p>Drawing upon insights from academic and grey literature, this paper contributes to characterising the system architecture underpinning EPR. It develops a conceptual framework using a life cycle thinking process through which EPR can be analysed, agreed upon, and operationalised. Such a conceptual framework can be helpful in governmental bodies tasked with framing effective EPR policies and for industry stakeholders responsible for take-back system design and implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001434/pdfft?md5=189d05e5a20e0e19fc49fd21841e1e12&pid=1-s2.0-S2667010024001434-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一项政策原则,生产者延伸责任(EPR)在不同产品国家的实践已有几十年,但其实施情况和结果却各不相同。在以 "索取-制造-废弃 "为基础的线性经济所带来的可持续发展危机中,以及在各种地球极限被突破的情况下,世界各国政府正越来越多地采用与生产者延伸责任相关的政策,欧盟的情况更是如此,"绿色交易"(Green Deal)带来了一波立法改革浪潮。在此背景下,政策制定者和制造商都迫切需要将 EPR 从单纯的废物管理策略转变为 "接口政策",涵盖循环经济、化学品和废物法等跨学科领域。本文利用生命周期思维过程建立了一个概念框架,通过该框架可以对 EPR 进行分析、达成一致并使其可操作化。这种概念框架有助于负责制定有效的 EPR 政策的政府机构以及负责回收系统设计和实施的行业利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and operationalising extended producer responsibility under the EU Green Deal

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) as a policy principle has been in practice in different product-country settings for a few decades now, and yet its implementation, as well as the outcomes, have varied. Amid the sustainability crises posed by the take-make-dispose-based linear economy and the transgression of the various planetary boundaries, governments worldwide are increasingly embracing CE-related policies, more so in the EU, with the Green Deal ushering in a wave of legislative transformations. Given this background, there is an urgent need for both policymakers and manufacturers to transition EPR from a mere waste management strategy to what can be termed as an “interface policy”, covering the interdisciplinary areas of circular economy, chemicals and waste law.

Drawing upon insights from academic and grey literature, this paper contributes to characterising the system architecture underpinning EPR. It develops a conceptual framework using a life cycle thinking process through which EPR can be analysed, agreed upon, and operationalised. Such a conceptual framework can be helpful in governmental bodies tasked with framing effective EPR policies and for industry stakeholders responsible for take-back system design and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信