S. Sasia , C. Vogel , I. Raymond , C. Coker , S. Grooms , W. Bridges , M. Arguelles-Ramos
{"title":"方法:不同回肠内容物采集方法对肉鸡回肠氨基酸消化系数测定的影响","authors":"S. Sasia , C. Vogel , I. Raymond , C. Coker , S. Grooms , W. Bridges , M. Arguelles-Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.anopes.2024.100073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study compared two collection methods (<strong>CMs</strong>) to obtain ileal content from broiler chickens to determine apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients (<strong>AIAAD</strong>). CM1 consisted of collecting the digesta by gently squeezing the ileum, while in CM2, the ileal digesta was flushed with distilled water. A total of 130 one-day-old male chicks were randomly distributed among 10 cages, using five replicate cages per CM. Birds were fed <em>ad libitum</em> with a standard starter diet from 0 to 18 d of age. At 18d, the diet switched to a corn-based semi-purified diet with 0.5% titanium dioxide (<strong>TiO2</strong>) as the indigestible marker. At 21d, birds were euthanized, and ileal digesta was collected using one of the two CMs. Bird performance was monitored; feed and lyophilized ileum content samples were analyzed to determine amino acids (<strong>AAs</strong>) and Ti content to determine AIAAD. A two-sided T-test and an F-test two-sided were performed to determine differences among the CMs’ means and variances, respectively. All significant differences were considered at a <em>P-</em>value < 0.05. Bird performance was similar for both groups throughout the experiment (<em>P</em> > 0.05). No significant differences between CMs were observed in the AIAAD coefficients for any of the amino acids analyzed (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The variances were significantly different for 6 AA (Iso, Lys, Thr, Ala, Asp, Glu; <em>P</em> < 0.05). In addition, four AAs approach significance (Leu, Met, Val, Pro; <em>P</em> < 0.1). The numeric values of the AAs variances were consistently higher when the sample was obtained using CM1. Squeezing may increase variability by enhancing endogenous losses like sloughed cells and mucin, underestimating digestibility in some samples. Using CM2 (flushing with distilled water) would provide more consistent and uniform results. This approach not only diminishes the likelihood of errors but also contributes to the standardization of methodologies applied in digestibility trials within the poultry research field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100083,"journal":{"name":"Animal - Open Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269402400013X/pdfft?md5=9706468055962fbe2807f4b76481858b&pid=1-s2.0-S277269402400013X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method: effect of different ileal content collection methods on ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients determination in broiler chickens\",\"authors\":\"S. Sasia , C. Vogel , I. Raymond , C. Coker , S. Grooms , W. Bridges , M. Arguelles-Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anopes.2024.100073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study compared two collection methods (<strong>CMs</strong>) to obtain ileal content from broiler chickens to determine apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients (<strong>AIAAD</strong>). CM1 consisted of collecting the digesta by gently squeezing the ileum, while in CM2, the ileal digesta was flushed with distilled water. A total of 130 one-day-old male chicks were randomly distributed among 10 cages, using five replicate cages per CM. Birds were fed <em>ad libitum</em> with a standard starter diet from 0 to 18 d of age. At 18d, the diet switched to a corn-based semi-purified diet with 0.5% titanium dioxide (<strong>TiO2</strong>) as the indigestible marker. At 21d, birds were euthanized, and ileal digesta was collected using one of the two CMs. Bird performance was monitored; feed and lyophilized ileum content samples were analyzed to determine amino acids (<strong>AAs</strong>) and Ti content to determine AIAAD. A two-sided T-test and an F-test two-sided were performed to determine differences among the CMs’ means and variances, respectively. All significant differences were considered at a <em>P-</em>value < 0.05. Bird performance was similar for both groups throughout the experiment (<em>P</em> > 0.05). No significant differences between CMs were observed in the AIAAD coefficients for any of the amino acids analyzed (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The variances were significantly different for 6 AA (Iso, Lys, Thr, Ala, Asp, Glu; <em>P</em> < 0.05). In addition, four AAs approach significance (Leu, Met, Val, Pro; <em>P</em> < 0.1). The numeric values of the AAs variances were consistently higher when the sample was obtained using CM1. Squeezing may increase variability by enhancing endogenous losses like sloughed cells and mucin, underestimating digestibility in some samples. Using CM2 (flushing with distilled water) would provide more consistent and uniform results. This approach not only diminishes the likelihood of errors but also contributes to the standardization of methodologies applied in digestibility trials within the poultry research field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal - Open Space\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269402400013X/pdfft?md5=9706468055962fbe2807f4b76481858b&pid=1-s2.0-S277269402400013X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal - Open Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269402400013X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal - Open Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269402400013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究比较了两种采集肉鸡回肠内容物的方法(CM),以测定表观回肠氨基酸消化系数(AIAAD)。CM1 包括轻轻挤压回肠收集消化液,而 CM2 则是用蒸馏水冲洗回肠消化液。总共 130 只出生一天的雄性雏鸡被随机分配到 10 个笼子中,每个 CM 使用 5 个重复笼子。从 0 日龄到 18 日龄,雏鸡自由采食标准开食料。18日龄时,日粮改为以玉米为基础的半精制日粮,并添加0.5%的二氧化钛(TiO2)作为难消化标记物。21d 时,对鸟类实施安乐死,并使用两种 CM 中的一种收集回肠消化物。监测鸟类的表现;分析饲料和冻干回肠内容物样本以确定氨基酸(AAs),分析钛含量以确定AIAAD。分别进行双侧 T 检验和双侧 F 检验,以确定 CM 均值和方差之间的差异。所有显着性差异均以 P 值 0.05 为标准。在整个实验过程中,两组鸟类的表现相似(P> 0.05)。在分析的氨基酸中,CMs 之间的 AIAAD 系数没有明显差异(P <0.05)。有 6 种氨基酸(Iso, Lys, Thr, Ala, Asp, Glu; P < 0.05)的方差有明显差异。此外,4 个 AA 接近显着性(Leu、Met、Val、Pro;P <;0.1)。使用 CM1 提取样本时,AAs 方差的数值一直较高。挤压可能会增加内源性损失,如脱落细胞和粘蛋白,从而低估某些样品的消化率。使用 CM2(用蒸馏水冲洗)可获得更一致、更均匀的结果。这种方法不仅能减少出错的可能性,还有助于家禽研究领域消化率试验方法的标准化。
Method: effect of different ileal content collection methods on ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients determination in broiler chickens
This study compared two collection methods (CMs) to obtain ileal content from broiler chickens to determine apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients (AIAAD). CM1 consisted of collecting the digesta by gently squeezing the ileum, while in CM2, the ileal digesta was flushed with distilled water. A total of 130 one-day-old male chicks were randomly distributed among 10 cages, using five replicate cages per CM. Birds were fed ad libitum with a standard starter diet from 0 to 18 d of age. At 18d, the diet switched to a corn-based semi-purified diet with 0.5% titanium dioxide (TiO2) as the indigestible marker. At 21d, birds were euthanized, and ileal digesta was collected using one of the two CMs. Bird performance was monitored; feed and lyophilized ileum content samples were analyzed to determine amino acids (AAs) and Ti content to determine AIAAD. A two-sided T-test and an F-test two-sided were performed to determine differences among the CMs’ means and variances, respectively. All significant differences were considered at a P-value < 0.05. Bird performance was similar for both groups throughout the experiment (P > 0.05). No significant differences between CMs were observed in the AIAAD coefficients for any of the amino acids analyzed (P < 0.05). The variances were significantly different for 6 AA (Iso, Lys, Thr, Ala, Asp, Glu; P < 0.05). In addition, four AAs approach significance (Leu, Met, Val, Pro; P < 0.1). The numeric values of the AAs variances were consistently higher when the sample was obtained using CM1. Squeezing may increase variability by enhancing endogenous losses like sloughed cells and mucin, underestimating digestibility in some samples. Using CM2 (flushing with distilled water) would provide more consistent and uniform results. This approach not only diminishes the likelihood of errors but also contributes to the standardization of methodologies applied in digestibility trials within the poultry research field.