工会解体中不断变化的教育和社会阶层梯度:来自第二次人口结构转型晚期国家的证据

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Elena Bastianelli , Raffaele Guetto , Daniele Vignoli
{"title":"工会解体中不断变化的教育和社会阶层梯度:来自第二次人口结构转型晚期国家的证据","authors":"Elena Bastianelli ,&nbsp;Raffaele Guetto ,&nbsp;Daniele Vignoli","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most studies on the changing socioeconomic gradient of divorce have operationalized individuals’ socioeconomic status (SES) through education, often neglecting social class differences. Education may proxy cultural and cognitive skills, whereas social class could more accurately capture economic means. Additionally, existing research has predominantly focused on women and marital dissolutions. This study addresses these oversights by analyzing the educational and social class gradients of both marriage and cohabitation dissolutions among men and women in Italy—a latecomer to the Second Demographic Transition. We used non-proportional hazard models to estimate survival curves and union dissolution probabilities stratified by education, social class, and cohort. Our findings reveal a vanishing socioeconomic gradient of marital dissolution among women and a reversal from positive to negative among men across cohorts. These results challenge the conventional view that men’s higher SES always stabilizes unions and support Goode’s hypothesis on the reversal of the socioeconomic gradient of divorce for both genders. No clear SES gradient was found for cohabiting unions. Overall, the study demonstrates the significant predictive power of social class for marital dissolutions, even when controlling for education, emphasizing the need to consider both measures of SES to comprehensively account for different underlying mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000672/pdfft?md5=8285670da1bb7793e0e298ec319d7d35&pid=1-s2.0-S0276562424000672-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The changing educational and social class gradients in union dissolution: Evidence from a latecomer of the Second Demographic Transition\",\"authors\":\"Elena Bastianelli ,&nbsp;Raffaele Guetto ,&nbsp;Daniele Vignoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most studies on the changing socioeconomic gradient of divorce have operationalized individuals’ socioeconomic status (SES) through education, often neglecting social class differences. Education may proxy cultural and cognitive skills, whereas social class could more accurately capture economic means. Additionally, existing research has predominantly focused on women and marital dissolutions. This study addresses these oversights by analyzing the educational and social class gradients of both marriage and cohabitation dissolutions among men and women in Italy—a latecomer to the Second Demographic Transition. We used non-proportional hazard models to estimate survival curves and union dissolution probabilities stratified by education, social class, and cohort. Our findings reveal a vanishing socioeconomic gradient of marital dissolution among women and a reversal from positive to negative among men across cohorts. These results challenge the conventional view that men’s higher SES always stabilizes unions and support Goode’s hypothesis on the reversal of the socioeconomic gradient of divorce for both genders. No clear SES gradient was found for cohabiting unions. Overall, the study demonstrates the significant predictive power of social class for marital dissolutions, even when controlling for education, emphasizing the need to consider both measures of SES to comprehensively account for different underlying mechanisms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000672/pdfft?md5=8285670da1bb7793e0e298ec319d7d35&pid=1-s2.0-S0276562424000672-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000672\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数关于离婚的社会经济梯度变化的研究都是通过教育来确定个人的社会经济地位(SES),往往忽略了社会阶层的差异。教育可以代表文化和认知技能,而社会阶层可以更准确地反映经济手段。此外,现有研究主要关注女性和婚姻解体。本研究通过分析意大利--第二次人口结构转型的后来者--男性和女性婚姻和同居解体的教育和社会阶层梯度,解决了这些问题。我们使用非比例危险模型估算了按教育程度、社会阶层和队列分层的生存曲线和婚姻解体概率。我们的研究结果表明,女性婚姻解体的社会经济梯度正在消失,而男性婚姻解体的社会经济梯度则从正向梯度逆转为负向梯度。这些结果挑战了 "男性社会经济地位越高,婚姻越稳定 "的传统观点,并支持了古德关于男女离婚社会经济梯度逆转的假设。在同居关系中没有发现明显的社会经济梯度。总之,该研究表明,即使在控制教育程度的情况下,社会阶层对婚姻解体也具有显著的预测能力,这就强调了同时考虑两种社会经济地位衡量标准以全面考虑不同潜在机制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The changing educational and social class gradients in union dissolution: Evidence from a latecomer of the Second Demographic Transition

Most studies on the changing socioeconomic gradient of divorce have operationalized individuals’ socioeconomic status (SES) through education, often neglecting social class differences. Education may proxy cultural and cognitive skills, whereas social class could more accurately capture economic means. Additionally, existing research has predominantly focused on women and marital dissolutions. This study addresses these oversights by analyzing the educational and social class gradients of both marriage and cohabitation dissolutions among men and women in Italy—a latecomer to the Second Demographic Transition. We used non-proportional hazard models to estimate survival curves and union dissolution probabilities stratified by education, social class, and cohort. Our findings reveal a vanishing socioeconomic gradient of marital dissolution among women and a reversal from positive to negative among men across cohorts. These results challenge the conventional view that men’s higher SES always stabilizes unions and support Goode’s hypothesis on the reversal of the socioeconomic gradient of divorce for both genders. No clear SES gradient was found for cohabiting unions. Overall, the study demonstrates the significant predictive power of social class for marital dissolutions, even when controlling for education, emphasizing the need to consider both measures of SES to comprehensively account for different underlying mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信