归巢鸽的导航本体:没有证据表明接触新的放飞地点足以促进学习

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Joe Morford , Anna Gagliardo , Enrica Pollonara , Tim Guilford
{"title":"归巢鸽的导航本体:没有证据表明接触新的放飞地点足以促进学习","authors":"Joe Morford ,&nbsp;Anna Gagliardo ,&nbsp;Enrica Pollonara ,&nbsp;Tim Guilford","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The navigational mechanisms of homing pigeons, <em>Columba livia</em>, have been extensively studied and represent a useful model for the navigation of birds and other animals. Pigeons navigate with an olfactory map and sun compass from unfamiliar areas and, in familiar areas, are largely guided by visual landscape cues, following stereotyped and idiosyncratic routes. However, the mechanisms by which they gain familiarity, improve their navigation and transition between navigational strategies during learning are not fully understood. Addressing these outstanding questions in this navigational model will help to improve our understanding of navigational ontogeny. We sought to investigate whether passive exposure to the cues at a site, without release, was sufficient for navigational learning, given that pigeons can determine the home direction before taking off. We exposed pigeons to cues at a novel site before returning them to the site the next day and releasing them alongside controls. We found no differences in the directional distributions, mean vector lengths, virtual vanishing times, efficiency indices or homing efficiency indices between birds that had and had not previously visited the site. We therefore found no evidence to suggest that passive exposure to the cues at a novel site was sufficient to facilitate a detectable improvement in navigational performance. There are three possible explanations for this result: first, a larger sample size would have detected a weak effect of learning; second, passive exposure to a release site is insufficient to generate navigational learning; and third, pigeons learn from passive exposure but do not rely upon this information, showing no difference in performance, despite learning. We discuss these three explanations with reference to previous findings on navigational learning in homing pigeons. We suggest that experiments should continue to examine navigational ontogeny in homing pigeons to help address this major problem for the field of navigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"214 ","pages":"Pages 157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334722400160X/pdfft?md5=8420224f870439070d5b7e6b86c05e6b&pid=1-s2.0-S000334722400160X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homing pigeon navigational ontogeny: no evidence that exposure to a novel release site is sufficient for learning\",\"authors\":\"Joe Morford ,&nbsp;Anna Gagliardo ,&nbsp;Enrica Pollonara ,&nbsp;Tim Guilford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The navigational mechanisms of homing pigeons, <em>Columba livia</em>, have been extensively studied and represent a useful model for the navigation of birds and other animals. Pigeons navigate with an olfactory map and sun compass from unfamiliar areas and, in familiar areas, are largely guided by visual landscape cues, following stereotyped and idiosyncratic routes. However, the mechanisms by which they gain familiarity, improve their navigation and transition between navigational strategies during learning are not fully understood. Addressing these outstanding questions in this navigational model will help to improve our understanding of navigational ontogeny. We sought to investigate whether passive exposure to the cues at a site, without release, was sufficient for navigational learning, given that pigeons can determine the home direction before taking off. We exposed pigeons to cues at a novel site before returning them to the site the next day and releasing them alongside controls. We found no differences in the directional distributions, mean vector lengths, virtual vanishing times, efficiency indices or homing efficiency indices between birds that had and had not previously visited the site. We therefore found no evidence to suggest that passive exposure to the cues at a novel site was sufficient to facilitate a detectable improvement in navigational performance. There are three possible explanations for this result: first, a larger sample size would have detected a weak effect of learning; second, passive exposure to a release site is insufficient to generate navigational learning; and third, pigeons learn from passive exposure but do not rely upon this information, showing no difference in performance, despite learning. We discuss these three explanations with reference to previous findings on navigational learning in homing pigeons. We suggest that experiments should continue to examine navigational ontogeny in homing pigeons to help address this major problem for the field of navigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334722400160X/pdfft?md5=8420224f870439070d5b7e6b86c05e6b&pid=1-s2.0-S000334722400160X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334722400160X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334722400160X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对归巢鸽(Columba livia)的导航机制进行了广泛的研究,它是鸟类和其他动物导航的一个有用模型。鸽子在不熟悉的地区利用嗅觉地图和太阳罗盘导航,而在熟悉的地区则主要依靠视觉景观线索的指引,遵循定型和特异的路线。然而,它们在学习过程中获得熟悉感、改善导航能力以及在不同导航策略之间转换的机制尚未完全明了。在这一导航模型中解决这些悬而未决的问题将有助于提高我们对导航本体的理解。考虑到鸽子在起飞前就能确定归巢方向,我们试图研究在不放飞的情况下被动地暴露于某一地点的线索是否足以促进导航学习。我们先让鸽子在一个新地点接触提示物,第二天再将它们送回该地点,然后将它们与对照组一起放飞。我们发现,在方向分布、平均矢量长度、虚拟消失时间、效率指数或归巢效率指数方面,到访过和未到访过该地点的鸽子没有差异。因此,我们没有发现任何证据表明,被动接触新地点的提示足以促进导航性能的明显改善。对这一结果有三种可能的解释:第一,更大的样本量会检测到微弱的学习效果;第二,被动接触放飞地点不足以产生导航学习;第三,鸽子从被动接触中学到了信息,但并不依赖于这些信息,尽管鸽子进行了学习,但它们的表现并无差异。我们结合以前对归巢鸽导航学习的研究结果,对这三种解释进行了讨论。我们建议应继续通过实验研究归巢鸽的导航本体,以帮助解决导航领域的这一重大问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Homing pigeon navigational ontogeny: no evidence that exposure to a novel release site is sufficient for learning

The navigational mechanisms of homing pigeons, Columba livia, have been extensively studied and represent a useful model for the navigation of birds and other animals. Pigeons navigate with an olfactory map and sun compass from unfamiliar areas and, in familiar areas, are largely guided by visual landscape cues, following stereotyped and idiosyncratic routes. However, the mechanisms by which they gain familiarity, improve their navigation and transition between navigational strategies during learning are not fully understood. Addressing these outstanding questions in this navigational model will help to improve our understanding of navigational ontogeny. We sought to investigate whether passive exposure to the cues at a site, without release, was sufficient for navigational learning, given that pigeons can determine the home direction before taking off. We exposed pigeons to cues at a novel site before returning them to the site the next day and releasing them alongside controls. We found no differences in the directional distributions, mean vector lengths, virtual vanishing times, efficiency indices or homing efficiency indices between birds that had and had not previously visited the site. We therefore found no evidence to suggest that passive exposure to the cues at a novel site was sufficient to facilitate a detectable improvement in navigational performance. There are three possible explanations for this result: first, a larger sample size would have detected a weak effect of learning; second, passive exposure to a release site is insufficient to generate navigational learning; and third, pigeons learn from passive exposure but do not rely upon this information, showing no difference in performance, despite learning. We discuss these three explanations with reference to previous findings on navigational learning in homing pigeons. We suggest that experiments should continue to examine navigational ontogeny in homing pigeons to help address this major problem for the field of navigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信