科罗拉多州音乐节和音乐会参加者同时使用大麻和迷幻剂的情况:使用混合方法描述增强和不良反应的特征。

IF 4.1 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cianna J Piercey, Eleftherios Hetelekides, Hollis C Karoly
{"title":"科罗拉多州音乐节和音乐会参加者同时使用大麻和迷幻剂的情况:使用混合方法描述增强和不良反应的特征。","authors":"Cianna J Piercey, Eleftherios Hetelekides, Hollis C Karoly","doi":"10.1186/s42238-024-00235-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most studies examining the simultaneous use of cannabis with other drugs have focused on cannabis and alcohol, with fewer studies examining simultaneous use of cannabis with other drugs. The United States is currently experiencing an upward trend in psychedelic use and there is an increasing need to characterize cannabis and psychedelic drug interactions to best inform public health recommendations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods field study design was used to survey participants (N = 128) on their lifetime co-use of cannabis with other drugs. Participants who reported lifetime co-use of cannabis and psychedelics (N = 63) were then asked open-ended questions about their most recent simultaneous co-use experience (i.e., how cannabis enhanced their psychedelic experience and whether they experienced any adverse reactions). We conducted a thematic analysis of responses describing how cannabis enhanced the psychedelic experience (N = 54). However, due to low response rate for participants reporting an adverse reaction (N = 7, 11.1%), responses to this question were not analyzed thematically and are instead presented individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes included tension reduction and balancing of drug effects (N = 27, 50%), enhancement to psychological processes (N = 11, 20.4%), intensified psychedelic drug effects (N = 12, 22.2%), enhanced psychedelic come-down experience (N = 8, 14.8%), and overall ambiguous enhancement (N = 7, 13%). Among participants reporting an adverse reaction, individual responses included increased anxiety and intensity of the experience, decreased sociability, increased negative affect, sleepiness, disassociation, and confusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional research is warranted to better characterize cannabis and psychedelic drug interactions to best inform public health recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous cannabis and psychedelic use among festival and concert attendees in Colorado: characterizing enhancement and adverse reactions using mixed methods.\",\"authors\":\"Cianna J Piercey, Eleftherios Hetelekides, Hollis C Karoly\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42238-024-00235-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most studies examining the simultaneous use of cannabis with other drugs have focused on cannabis and alcohol, with fewer studies examining simultaneous use of cannabis with other drugs. The United States is currently experiencing an upward trend in psychedelic use and there is an increasing need to characterize cannabis and psychedelic drug interactions to best inform public health recommendations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods field study design was used to survey participants (N = 128) on their lifetime co-use of cannabis with other drugs. Participants who reported lifetime co-use of cannabis and psychedelics (N = 63) were then asked open-ended questions about their most recent simultaneous co-use experience (i.e., how cannabis enhanced their psychedelic experience and whether they experienced any adverse reactions). We conducted a thematic analysis of responses describing how cannabis enhanced the psychedelic experience (N = 54). However, due to low response rate for participants reporting an adverse reaction (N = 7, 11.1%), responses to this question were not analyzed thematically and are instead presented individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes included tension reduction and balancing of drug effects (N = 27, 50%), enhancement to psychological processes (N = 11, 20.4%), intensified psychedelic drug effects (N = 12, 22.2%), enhanced psychedelic come-down experience (N = 8, 14.8%), and overall ambiguous enhancement (N = 7, 13%). Among participants reporting an adverse reaction, individual responses included increased anxiety and intensity of the experience, decreased sociability, increased negative affect, sleepiness, disassociation, and confusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional research is warranted to better characterize cannabis and psychedelic drug interactions to best inform public health recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-024-00235-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-024-00235-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数关于大麻与其他药物同时使用的研究都侧重于大麻和酒精,而关于大麻与其他药物同时使用的研究较少。美国目前的迷幻药使用呈上升趋势,因此越来越需要了解大麻与迷幻药相互作用的特点,以便为公共健康建议提供最佳信息:采用混合方法实地研究设计,调查参与者(128 人)一生中大麻与其他药物共同使用的情况。然后向报告一生中曾同时吸食大麻和迷幻药的参与者(63 人)提出开放式问题,询问他们最近同时吸食大麻和迷幻药的经历(即大麻如何增强了他们的迷幻体验,以及他们是否经历过任何不良反应)。我们对描述大麻如何增强迷幻体验的回答进行了主题分析(N = 54)。然而,由于报告出现不良反应的参与者的回复率较低(7 人,11.1%),我们没有对这一问题的回复进行专题分析,而是逐一列出:主题包括减轻紧张和平衡药效(27 人,50%)、增强心理过程(11 人,20.4%)、加强迷幻药效(12 人,22.2%)、增强迷幻药的下坠体验(8 人,14.8%)和整体模糊增强(7 人,13%)。在报告不良反应的参与者中,个人反应包括焦虑增加和体验强度增加、交际能力下降、负面情绪增加、困倦、不合群和困惑:有必要开展更多研究,以更好地描述大麻和迷幻药之间的相互作用,从而为公共健康建议提供最佳信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simultaneous cannabis and psychedelic use among festival and concert attendees in Colorado: characterizing enhancement and adverse reactions using mixed methods.

Background: Most studies examining the simultaneous use of cannabis with other drugs have focused on cannabis and alcohol, with fewer studies examining simultaneous use of cannabis with other drugs. The United States is currently experiencing an upward trend in psychedelic use and there is an increasing need to characterize cannabis and psychedelic drug interactions to best inform public health recommendations.

Materials and methods: A mixed methods field study design was used to survey participants (N = 128) on their lifetime co-use of cannabis with other drugs. Participants who reported lifetime co-use of cannabis and psychedelics (N = 63) were then asked open-ended questions about their most recent simultaneous co-use experience (i.e., how cannabis enhanced their psychedelic experience and whether they experienced any adverse reactions). We conducted a thematic analysis of responses describing how cannabis enhanced the psychedelic experience (N = 54). However, due to low response rate for participants reporting an adverse reaction (N = 7, 11.1%), responses to this question were not analyzed thematically and are instead presented individually.

Results: Themes included tension reduction and balancing of drug effects (N = 27, 50%), enhancement to psychological processes (N = 11, 20.4%), intensified psychedelic drug effects (N = 12, 22.2%), enhanced psychedelic come-down experience (N = 8, 14.8%), and overall ambiguous enhancement (N = 7, 13%). Among participants reporting an adverse reaction, individual responses included increased anxiety and intensity of the experience, decreased sociability, increased negative affect, sleepiness, disassociation, and confusion.

Conclusion: Additional research is warranted to better characterize cannabis and psychedelic drug interactions to best inform public health recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信