对医疗机构临床洗手盆下水道中产碳青霉烯酶生物的取样和检测方法进行比较。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
{"title":"对医疗机构临床洗手盆下水道中产碳青霉烯酶生物的取样和检测方法进行比较。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are currently no standardized methods for the sampling and testing of clinical handwash basin (HWB) samples for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). Methods used for sampling (drain aspirate vs swab from top of drain) and detection of CPOs in clinical HWB drains in two different healthcare settings, one which was dealing with a hospital-wide CPO outbreak (Hospital A) and another with no reported outbreaks (Hospital B), were compared. Drain aspirates and swabs from HWB drains were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) together with culture-based methods. No significant difference in detection of CPOs was found between drain aspirate or swab methods of sampling. Direct PCR on samples detected significantly more carbapenemase genes than culture on CARBA agar (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001 and 0.0045, respectively). A higher percentage of HWB drains were positive in Hospital A both by culture and by direct PCR, and a significantly higher number of carbapenemase genes were detected in HWB drain aspirates at Hospital A, both by PCR and by culture (<em>P</em>=0.014 and 0.0071, respectively). There was high correlation between drain swab positivity by PCR and culture in Hospital A (91%) compared with Hospital B (33%). No difference in drain contamination rates was found when HWBs with a rear drain were compared with HWBs with the drain directly below the tap. Colonization of HWBs at the top of the drain may be related to risk of cross-transmission of CPOs from the healthcare environment to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methods for sampling and detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms in clinical handwash basin drains in health care\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are currently no standardized methods for the sampling and testing of clinical handwash basin (HWB) samples for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). Methods used for sampling (drain aspirate vs swab from top of drain) and detection of CPOs in clinical HWB drains in two different healthcare settings, one which was dealing with a hospital-wide CPO outbreak (Hospital A) and another with no reported outbreaks (Hospital B), were compared. Drain aspirates and swabs from HWB drains were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) together with culture-based methods. No significant difference in detection of CPOs was found between drain aspirate or swab methods of sampling. Direct PCR on samples detected significantly more carbapenemase genes than culture on CARBA agar (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001 and 0.0045, respectively). A higher percentage of HWB drains were positive in Hospital A both by culture and by direct PCR, and a significantly higher number of carbapenemase genes were detected in HWB drain aspirates at Hospital A, both by PCR and by culture (<em>P</em>=0.014 and 0.0071, respectively). There was high correlation between drain swab positivity by PCR and culture in Hospital A (91%) compared with Hospital B (33%). No difference in drain contamination rates was found when HWBs with a rear drain were compared with HWBs with the drain directly below the tap. Colonization of HWBs at the top of the drain may be related to risk of cross-transmission of CPOs from the healthcare environment to patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还没有对临床洗手盆(HWB)样本进行采样和检测以检测碳青霉烯酶产细菌(CPO)的标准化方法。我们比较了两种不同医疗机构的取样方法(下水道吸出物和下水道顶部拭子)和临床洗手盆下水道中产碳青霉烯菌的检测方法,其中一家医院(A 医院)正在处理医院范围内爆发的产碳青霉烯菌疫情,而另一家医院(B 医院)则没有爆发疫情的报告。采用多重 PCR 和培养方法对 HWB 引流管的引流液吸出物和拭子进行了检测。结果发现,采用引流液抽吸法或拭子取样法检测出的 CPO 没有明显差异。与在 CARBA 琼脂上培养相比,在样本上直接 PCR 检测出的碳青霉烯酶基因明显更多(p < 0.0001 和 0.0045)。A 医院的 HWB 引流管培养和直接 PCR 阳性比例较高,A 医院的 HWB 引流管抽吸物 PCR 和培养检出的碳青霉烯酶基因数量明显较多(p = 0.014 和 0.0071)。在 A 医院,引流管拭子的 PCR 和培养阳性率之间的相关性很高(91%),而 B 医院仅为 33%。如果将排水口在后部的 HWB 与排水口在水龙头正下方的 HWB 进行比较,则排水口污染率没有差异。下水道顶部的 HWB 定殖可能与 CPO 从医疗环境交叉传染给病人的风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of methods for sampling and detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms in clinical handwash basin drains in health care

There are currently no standardized methods for the sampling and testing of clinical handwash basin (HWB) samples for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). Methods used for sampling (drain aspirate vs swab from top of drain) and detection of CPOs in clinical HWB drains in two different healthcare settings, one which was dealing with a hospital-wide CPO outbreak (Hospital A) and another with no reported outbreaks (Hospital B), were compared. Drain aspirates and swabs from HWB drains were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) together with culture-based methods. No significant difference in detection of CPOs was found between drain aspirate or swab methods of sampling. Direct PCR on samples detected significantly more carbapenemase genes than culture on CARBA agar (P<0.0001 and 0.0045, respectively). A higher percentage of HWB drains were positive in Hospital A both by culture and by direct PCR, and a significantly higher number of carbapenemase genes were detected in HWB drain aspirates at Hospital A, both by PCR and by culture (P=0.014 and 0.0071, respectively). There was high correlation between drain swab positivity by PCR and culture in Hospital A (91%) compared with Hospital B (33%). No difference in drain contamination rates was found when HWBs with a rear drain were compared with HWBs with the drain directly below the tap. Colonization of HWBs at the top of the drain may be related to risk of cross-transmission of CPOs from the healthcare environment to patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信