{"title":"对医疗机构临床洗手盆下水道中产碳青霉烯酶生物的取样和检测方法进行比较。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are currently no standardized methods for the sampling and testing of clinical handwash basin (HWB) samples for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). Methods used for sampling (drain aspirate vs swab from top of drain) and detection of CPOs in clinical HWB drains in two different healthcare settings, one which was dealing with a hospital-wide CPO outbreak (Hospital A) and another with no reported outbreaks (Hospital B), were compared. Drain aspirates and swabs from HWB drains were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) together with culture-based methods. No significant difference in detection of CPOs was found between drain aspirate or swab methods of sampling. Direct PCR on samples detected significantly more carbapenemase genes than culture on CARBA agar (<em>P</em><0.0001 and 0.0045, respectively). A higher percentage of HWB drains were positive in Hospital A both by culture and by direct PCR, and a significantly higher number of carbapenemase genes were detected in HWB drain aspirates at Hospital A, both by PCR and by culture (<em>P</em>=0.014 and 0.0071, respectively). There was high correlation between drain swab positivity by PCR and culture in Hospital A (91%) compared with Hospital B (33%). No difference in drain contamination rates was found when HWBs with a rear drain were compared with HWBs with the drain directly below the tap. Colonization of HWBs at the top of the drain may be related to risk of cross-transmission of CPOs from the healthcare environment to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"152 ","pages":"Pages 28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of methods for sampling and detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms in clinical handwash basin drains in health care\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are currently no standardized methods for the sampling and testing of clinical handwash basin (HWB) samples for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). Methods used for sampling (drain aspirate vs swab from top of drain) and detection of CPOs in clinical HWB drains in two different healthcare settings, one which was dealing with a hospital-wide CPO outbreak (Hospital A) and another with no reported outbreaks (Hospital B), were compared. Drain aspirates and swabs from HWB drains were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) together with culture-based methods. No significant difference in detection of CPOs was found between drain aspirate or swab methods of sampling. Direct PCR on samples detected significantly more carbapenemase genes than culture on CARBA agar (<em>P</em><0.0001 and 0.0045, respectively). A higher percentage of HWB drains were positive in Hospital A both by culture and by direct PCR, and a significantly higher number of carbapenemase genes were detected in HWB drain aspirates at Hospital A, both by PCR and by culture (<em>P</em>=0.014 and 0.0071, respectively). There was high correlation between drain swab positivity by PCR and culture in Hospital A (91%) compared with Hospital B (33%). No difference in drain contamination rates was found when HWBs with a rear drain were compared with HWBs with the drain directly below the tap. Colonization of HWBs at the top of the drain may be related to risk of cross-transmission of CPOs from the healthcare environment to patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 28-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of methods for sampling and detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms in clinical handwash basin drains in health care
There are currently no standardized methods for the sampling and testing of clinical handwash basin (HWB) samples for the detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs). Methods used for sampling (drain aspirate vs swab from top of drain) and detection of CPOs in clinical HWB drains in two different healthcare settings, one which was dealing with a hospital-wide CPO outbreak (Hospital A) and another with no reported outbreaks (Hospital B), were compared. Drain aspirates and swabs from HWB drains were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) together with culture-based methods. No significant difference in detection of CPOs was found between drain aspirate or swab methods of sampling. Direct PCR on samples detected significantly more carbapenemase genes than culture on CARBA agar (P<0.0001 and 0.0045, respectively). A higher percentage of HWB drains were positive in Hospital A both by culture and by direct PCR, and a significantly higher number of carbapenemase genes were detected in HWB drain aspirates at Hospital A, both by PCR and by culture (P=0.014 and 0.0071, respectively). There was high correlation between drain swab positivity by PCR and culture in Hospital A (91%) compared with Hospital B (33%). No difference in drain contamination rates was found when HWBs with a rear drain were compared with HWBs with the drain directly below the tap. Colonization of HWBs at the top of the drain may be related to risk of cross-transmission of CPOs from the healthcare environment to patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.