声影促进超声引导下的动脉插管:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lipi Mishra, Chandra Rath, Bradley Wibrow, Matthew Anstey, Kwok Ho
{"title":"声影促进超声引导下的动脉插管:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Lipi Mishra, Chandra Rath, Bradley Wibrow, Matthew Anstey, Kwok Ho","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization is a frequently performed procedure. Additional techniques such as acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound may be useful in improving success rate. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of acoustic shadowing assisted ultrasound for arterial catheterization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EMCARE, and MedNar were searched in January 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the first attempt success rate of arterial catheterization using acoustic shadowing ultrasound vs unassisted ultrasound were included. Data were pooled for risk ratios (RRs) using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on a single or double acoustic line. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken after excluding pediatric data. The certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 777) were included. A meta-analysis found the first attempt success rate is significantly higher in the acoustic ultrasound group (<i>n</i> = 6, RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.66, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.00001). Hematoma formation was significantly less in the acoustic ultrasound group (<i>n</i> = 6, RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.003). First attempt success was significantly higher in the single acoustic line ultrasound (USG) group compared to the unassisted ultrasound group (<i>n</i> = 3, RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis after excluding pediatric data was similar to the primary analysis (<i>n</i> = 5, RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.70, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.00001). Certainty of evidence was \"Moderate\" for the first attempt cannulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound improved first-attempt arterial catheterization success rate and was associated with reduced hematoma formation.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mishra L, Rath C, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Ho K. Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):677-685.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"28 7","pages":"677-685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11234128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Lipi Mishra, Chandra Rath, Bradley Wibrow, Matthew Anstey, Kwok Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization is a frequently performed procedure. Additional techniques such as acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound may be useful in improving success rate. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of acoustic shadowing assisted ultrasound for arterial catheterization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EMCARE, and MedNar were searched in January 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the first attempt success rate of arterial catheterization using acoustic shadowing ultrasound vs unassisted ultrasound were included. Data were pooled for risk ratios (RRs) using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on a single or double acoustic line. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken after excluding pediatric data. The certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 777) were included. A meta-analysis found the first attempt success rate is significantly higher in the acoustic ultrasound group (<i>n</i> = 6, RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.66, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.00001). Hematoma formation was significantly less in the acoustic ultrasound group (<i>n</i> = 6, RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.003). First attempt success was significantly higher in the single acoustic line ultrasound (USG) group compared to the unassisted ultrasound group (<i>n</i> = 3, RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis after excluding pediatric data was similar to the primary analysis (<i>n</i> = 5, RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.70, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.00001). Certainty of evidence was \\\"Moderate\\\" for the first attempt cannulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound improved first-attempt arterial catheterization success rate and was associated with reduced hematoma formation.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mishra L, Rath C, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Ho K. Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):677-685.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 7\",\"pages\":\"677-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11234128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和背景:超声引导下的动脉导管插入术是一种经常使用的手术。声影辅助超声等附加技术可能有助于提高成功率。本系统综述旨在评估声影辅助超声对动脉导管插入术的疗效:于 2024 年 1 月检索了 PubMed、Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、EMCARE 和 MedNar。纳入的随机对照试验比较了使用声影超声与无辅助超声进行动脉导管插入术的首次尝试成功率。采用随机效应模型对数据进行风险比 (RR) 的汇总。根据单声道线或双声道线进行了分组分析。在排除儿科数据后进行了敏感性分析。采用 GRADE 框架对证据的确定性(COE)进行评估:结果:共纳入六项随机对照试验(n = 777)。荟萃分析发现,声学超声组的首次尝试成功率明显更高(n = 6,RR:0.47,95% CI:0.34-0.66,p ≤ 0.00001)。声学超声组血肿形成明显较少(n = 6,RR:0.52,95% CI:0.34-0.80,p = 0.003)。与无辅助超声组相比,单声道超声(USG)组的首次尝试成功率明显更高(n = 3,RR:0.41,95% CI:0.28-0.59,p ≤ 0.00001)。排除儿科数据后的敏感性分析结果与主要分析结果相似(n = 5,RR:0.50,95% CI:0.33-0.70,p ≤ 0.00001)。首次尝试插管的证据确定性为 "中度":声影辅助超声提高了首次尝试动脉导管插入术的成功率,并减少了血肿的形成:Mishra L, Rath C, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Ho K. Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):677-685.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Aim and background: Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization is a frequently performed procedure. Additional techniques such as acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound may be useful in improving success rate. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of acoustic shadowing assisted ultrasound for arterial catheterization.

Materials and methods: PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EMCARE, and MedNar were searched in January 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the first attempt success rate of arterial catheterization using acoustic shadowing ultrasound vs unassisted ultrasound were included. Data were pooled for risk ratios (RRs) using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on a single or double acoustic line. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken after excluding pediatric data. The certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the GRADE framework.

Results: Six randomized controlled trials (n = 777) were included. A meta-analysis found the first attempt success rate is significantly higher in the acoustic ultrasound group (n = 6, RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.66, p ≤ 0.00001). Hematoma formation was significantly less in the acoustic ultrasound group (n = 6, RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.80, p = 0.003). First attempt success was significantly higher in the single acoustic line ultrasound (USG) group compared to the unassisted ultrasound group (n = 3, RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, p ≤ 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis after excluding pediatric data was similar to the primary analysis (n = 5, RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.70, p ≤ 0.00001). Certainty of evidence was "Moderate" for the first attempt cannulation.

Conclusions: Acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound improved first-attempt arterial catheterization success rate and was associated with reduced hematoma formation.

How to cite this article: Mishra L, Rath C, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Ho K. Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):677-685.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信