胰腺癌术后监测:全球指南范围综述和北欧当代实践调查。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Daniel Ansari, Kjetil Søreide, Bodil Andersson, Carsten Palnæs Hansen, Hanna Seppänen, Ernesto Sparrelid, Knut Jørgen Labori, Jakob Kirkegård, Saila Kauhanen, Christopher Månsson, Linn Såve Nymo, Minna Nortunen, Bergthor Björnsson, Antti Kivivuori, Bobby Tingstedt, Svein-Olav Bratlie, Kim Waardal, Johanna Laukkarinen, Asif Halimi, Hannes Lindberg, Håkan Olin, Roland Andersson
{"title":"胰腺癌术后监测:全球指南范围综述和北欧当代实践调查。","authors":"Daniel Ansari, Kjetil Søreide, Bodil Andersson, Carsten Palnæs Hansen, Hanna Seppänen, Ernesto Sparrelid, Knut Jørgen Labori, Jakob Kirkegård, Saila Kauhanen, Christopher Månsson, Linn Såve Nymo, Minna Nortunen, Bergthor Björnsson, Antti Kivivuori, Bobby Tingstedt, Svein-Olav Bratlie, Kim Waardal, Johanna Laukkarinen, Asif Halimi, Hannes Lindberg, Håkan Olin, Roland Andersson","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. ‍This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1097-1104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a global scoping review of guidelines and a nordic Survey of contemporary practice.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Ansari, Kjetil Søreide, Bodil Andersson, Carsten Palnæs Hansen, Hanna Seppänen, Ernesto Sparrelid, Knut Jørgen Labori, Jakob Kirkegård, Saila Kauhanen, Christopher Månsson, Linn Såve Nymo, Minna Nortunen, Bergthor Björnsson, Antti Kivivuori, Bobby Tingstedt, Svein-Olav Bratlie, Kim Waardal, Johanna Laukkarinen, Asif Halimi, Hannes Lindberg, Håkan Olin, Roland Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. ‍This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1097-1104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数接受过手术切除的胰腺癌患者最终都会复发。‍本研究旨在调查是否有证据支持胰腺癌手术后的常规监测,其次是分析北欧国家监测策略的实施情况:对全球范围内与胰腺癌切除术后监控相关的临床实践指南和研究进行了范围界定。随后对四个北欧国家的 20 个胰腺科室进行了调查,以评估他们目前对手术患者的随访情况:结果:共纳入了 16 份临床实践指南和 17 项研究。这些指南对胰腺癌术后监测提出了不一致的建议。临床研究数据主要基于证据水平较低的回顾性队列研究,且未涉及准备时间偏差。瑞典和丹麦建议进行积极的监测,但挪威建议在术后/辅助治疗期后不进行监测。芬兰没有全国性的监测建议。北欧调查显示,不同单位报告的做法差异很大。约 75%(20 个单位中的 15 个)进行了常规术后监测。作为监测的一部分,80%的中心进行了常规CA 19-9检测,67%的中心进行了常规CT检测。约 73% 的中心继续随访至术后 5 年:结论:胰腺癌术后长期(即 5 年)常规监测的证据仍然有限。北欧国家的大多数胰腺科室都会进行定期随访,但方案各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a global scoping review of guidelines and a nordic Survey of contemporary practice.

Objectives: Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. ‍This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.

Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.

Results: Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.

Conclusion: Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信