无创肝脏脂肪定量:多回波 Dixon 能帮上忙吗?

Q3 Medicine
Radiologia Brasileira Pub Date : 2024-05-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0125
Akarshi Gupta, Rashmi Dixit, Anjali Prakash
{"title":"无创肝脏脂肪定量:多回波 Dixon 能帮上忙吗?","authors":"Akarshi Gupta, Rashmi Dixit, Anjali Prakash","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatic fat quantification, in comparison with that of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), on 3.0-T MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-five adults with no known liver disease underwent MRI in a 3.0-T scanner for determination of the hepatic fat fraction, with two techniques: multi-echo Dixon, in a manually drawn region of interest (ROI) and in the entire liver parenchyma (automated segmentation); and MRS. The diagnostic accuracy and cutoff value for multi-echo Dixon were determined, with MRS being used as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean fat fraction obtained by multi-echo Dixon in the manually drawn ROI and in the entire liver was 5.2 ± 5.8% and 6.6 ± 5.2%, respectively, whereas the mean hepatic fat fraction obtained by MRS was 5.7 ± 6.4%. A very strong positive correlation and good agreement were observed between MRS and multi-echo Dixon, for the ROI (r = 0.988, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.978, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and for the entire liver parenchyma (r = 0.960, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.922, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the hepatic fat fraction and body mass index of the participants, regardless of the fat estimation technique employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For hepatic fat quantification, multi-echo Dixon MRI demonstrated a very strong positive correlation and good agreement with MRS (often considered the gold-standard noninvasive technique). Because multi-echo Dixon MRI is more readily available than is MRS, it can be used as a rapid tool for hepatic fat quantification, especially when the hepatic fat distribution is not homogeneous.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":"57 ","pages":"e20230125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive hepatic fat quantification: Can multi-echo Dixon help?\",\"authors\":\"Akarshi Gupta, Rashmi Dixit, Anjali Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatic fat quantification, in comparison with that of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), on 3.0-T MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-five adults with no known liver disease underwent MRI in a 3.0-T scanner for determination of the hepatic fat fraction, with two techniques: multi-echo Dixon, in a manually drawn region of interest (ROI) and in the entire liver parenchyma (automated segmentation); and MRS. The diagnostic accuracy and cutoff value for multi-echo Dixon were determined, with MRS being used as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean fat fraction obtained by multi-echo Dixon in the manually drawn ROI and in the entire liver was 5.2 ± 5.8% and 6.6 ± 5.2%, respectively, whereas the mean hepatic fat fraction obtained by MRS was 5.7 ± 6.4%. A very strong positive correlation and good agreement were observed between MRS and multi-echo Dixon, for the ROI (r = 0.988, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.978, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and for the entire liver parenchyma (r = 0.960, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.922, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the hepatic fat fraction and body mass index of the participants, regardless of the fat estimation technique employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For hepatic fat quantification, multi-echo Dixon MRI demonstrated a very strong positive correlation and good agreement with MRS (often considered the gold-standard noninvasive technique). Because multi-echo Dixon MRI is more readily available than is MRS, it can be used as a rapid tool for hepatic fat quantification, especially when the hepatic fat distribution is not homogeneous.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"e20230125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估多回波 Dixon 磁共振成像(MRI)与磁共振波谱成像(MRS)在 3.0-T 磁共振成像中对肝脏脂肪定量的诊断准确性:55名无已知肝病的成年人在3.0T扫描仪上接受了核磁共振成像检查,以确定肝脏脂肪比例,检查采用了两种技术:在手动绘制的感兴趣区(ROI)和整个肝实质(自动分割)内进行多回波Dixon;以及MRS。以 MRS 作为参考标准,确定了多回波 Dixon 的诊断准确性和临界值:结果:多回波 Dixon 在手动绘制的 ROI 和整个肝脏中获得的平均脂肪率分别为 5.2 ± 5.8% 和 6.6 ± 5.2%,而 MRS 获得的平均肝脏脂肪率为 5.7 ± 6.4%。MRS 和多回波 Dixon 在 ROI(r = 0.988,r2 = 0.978,p < 0.001)和整个肝实质(r = 0.960,r2 = 0.922,p < 0.001)方面具有很强的正相关性和良好的一致性。无论采用哪种脂肪估算技术,参与者的肝脏脂肪分数与体重指数之间都呈中度正相关:结论:在肝脏脂肪定量方面,多回波 Dixon MRI 与 MRS(通常被认为是黄金标准的无创技术)具有很强的正相关性和良好的一致性。由于多回波 Dixon MRI 比 MRS 更容易获得,因此可用作肝脏脂肪定量的快速工具,尤其是在肝脏脂肪分布不均匀的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-invasive hepatic fat quantification: Can multi-echo Dixon help?

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatic fat quantification, in comparison with that of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), on 3.0-T MRI.

Materials and methods: Fifty-five adults with no known liver disease underwent MRI in a 3.0-T scanner for determination of the hepatic fat fraction, with two techniques: multi-echo Dixon, in a manually drawn region of interest (ROI) and in the entire liver parenchyma (automated segmentation); and MRS. The diagnostic accuracy and cutoff value for multi-echo Dixon were determined, with MRS being used as the reference standard.

Results: The mean fat fraction obtained by multi-echo Dixon in the manually drawn ROI and in the entire liver was 5.2 ± 5.8% and 6.6 ± 5.2%, respectively, whereas the mean hepatic fat fraction obtained by MRS was 5.7 ± 6.4%. A very strong positive correlation and good agreement were observed between MRS and multi-echo Dixon, for the ROI (r = 0.988, r2 = 0.978, p < 0.001) and for the entire liver parenchyma (r = 0.960, r2 = 0.922, p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the hepatic fat fraction and body mass index of the participants, regardless of the fat estimation technique employed.

Conclusion: For hepatic fat quantification, multi-echo Dixon MRI demonstrated a very strong positive correlation and good agreement with MRS (often considered the gold-standard noninvasive technique). Because multi-echo Dixon MRI is more readily available than is MRS, it can be used as a rapid tool for hepatic fat quantification, especially when the hepatic fat distribution is not homogeneous.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Brasileira
Radiologia Brasileira Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信