如何准确量化帕金森病的脑磁感应强度:在 1.5 和 3 T 下对模型和健康志愿者进行验证。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
NMR in Biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1002/nbm.5182
Aurélien Hervouin, Johanne Bézy-Wendling, Fanny Noury
{"title":"如何准确量化帕金森病的脑磁感应强度:在 1.5 和 3 T 下对模型和健康志愿者进行验证。","authors":"Aurélien Hervouin, Johanne Bézy-Wendling, Fanny Noury","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, brain iron content represents a new neuromarker for understanding the physiopathological mechanisms leading to Parkinson's disease (PD). In vivo quantification of biological iron is possible by reconstructing magnetic susceptibility maps obtained using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Applying QSM is challenging, as up to now, no standardization of acquisition protocols and phase image processing has emerged from referenced studies. Our objectives were to compare the accuracy and the sensitivity of 10 QSM pipelines built from algorithms from the literature, applied on phantoms data and on brain data. Two phantoms, with known magnetic susceptibility ranges, were created from several solutions of gadolinium chelate. Twenty healthy volunteers from two age groups were included. Phantoms and brain data were acquired at 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. Susceptibility-weighted images were obtained using a 3D multigradient-recalled-echo sequence. For brain data, 3D anatomical T1- and T2-weighted images were also acquired to segment the deep gray nuclei of interest. Concerning in vitro data, the linear dependence of magnetic susceptibility versus gadolinium concentration and deviations from the theoretically expected values were calculated. For brain data, the accuracy and sensitivity of the QSM pipelines were evaluated in comparison with results from the literature and regarding the expected magnetic susceptibility increase with age, respectively. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the magnetic susceptibility quantification in deep gray nuclei between the two age groups. Our methodology enabled quantifying magnetic susceptibility in human brain and the results were consistent with those from the literature. Statistically significant differences were obtained between the two age groups in all cerebral regions of interest. Our results show the importance of optimizing QSM pipelines according to the application and the targeted magnetic susceptibility range, to achieve accurate quantification. We were able to define the optimal QSM pipeline for future applications on patients with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"e5182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to accurately quantify brain magnetic susceptibility in the context of Parkinson's disease: Validation on phantoms and healthy volunteers at 1.5 and 3 T.\",\"authors\":\"Aurélien Hervouin, Johanne Bézy-Wendling, Fanny Noury\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nbm.5182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Currently, brain iron content represents a new neuromarker for understanding the physiopathological mechanisms leading to Parkinson's disease (PD). In vivo quantification of biological iron is possible by reconstructing magnetic susceptibility maps obtained using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Applying QSM is challenging, as up to now, no standardization of acquisition protocols and phase image processing has emerged from referenced studies. Our objectives were to compare the accuracy and the sensitivity of 10 QSM pipelines built from algorithms from the literature, applied on phantoms data and on brain data. Two phantoms, with known magnetic susceptibility ranges, were created from several solutions of gadolinium chelate. Twenty healthy volunteers from two age groups were included. Phantoms and brain data were acquired at 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. Susceptibility-weighted images were obtained using a 3D multigradient-recalled-echo sequence. For brain data, 3D anatomical T1- and T2-weighted images were also acquired to segment the deep gray nuclei of interest. Concerning in vitro data, the linear dependence of magnetic susceptibility versus gadolinium concentration and deviations from the theoretically expected values were calculated. For brain data, the accuracy and sensitivity of the QSM pipelines were evaluated in comparison with results from the literature and regarding the expected magnetic susceptibility increase with age, respectively. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the magnetic susceptibility quantification in deep gray nuclei between the two age groups. Our methodology enabled quantifying magnetic susceptibility in human brain and the results were consistent with those from the literature. Statistically significant differences were obtained between the two age groups in all cerebral regions of interest. Our results show the importance of optimizing QSM pipelines according to the application and the targeted magnetic susceptibility range, to achieve accurate quantification. We were able to define the optimal QSM pipeline for future applications on patients with PD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NMR in Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e5182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NMR in Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,脑铁含量是了解导致帕金森病(PD)的生理病理机制的一种新的神经标记物。通过使用定量磁感应强度图谱(QSM)重建磁感应强度图谱,可以实现生物铁的体内定量。定量磁感应强度绘图的应用具有挑战性,因为到目前为止,参考研究还没有对采集协议和相位图像处理进行标准化。我们的目标是比较 10 个 QSM 管道的准确性和灵敏度,这些管道采用文献中的算法,应用于模型数据和大脑数据。我们用几种钆螯合物溶液制作了两个具有已知磁感应强度范围的模型。研究对象包括来自两个年龄组的 20 名健康志愿者。模型和大脑数据分别在 1.5 和 3 T 下采集。使用三维多radient-recalled-echo序列获得感度加权图像。对于脑部数据,还采集了三维解剖 T1 和 T2 加权图像,以分割感兴趣的深灰色核团。关于体外数据,计算了磁感应强度与钆浓度的线性关系以及与理论预期值的偏差。对于脑部数据,通过与文献结果的比较,以及与预期磁感应强度随年龄增长的比较,分别评估了 QSM 管道的准确性和灵敏度。使用非参数曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较了两个年龄组之间深灰核的磁感应强度量化情况。我们的方法可以量化人脑的磁感应强度,结果与文献报道一致。在所有感兴趣的脑区,两个年龄组之间都存在统计学意义上的显著差异。我们的结果表明,根据应用和目标磁感应强度范围优化 QSM 管道对于实现精确量化非常重要。我们能够确定未来应用于帕金森病患者的最佳 QSM 管道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to accurately quantify brain magnetic susceptibility in the context of Parkinson's disease: Validation on phantoms and healthy volunteers at 1.5 and 3 T.

Currently, brain iron content represents a new neuromarker for understanding the physiopathological mechanisms leading to Parkinson's disease (PD). In vivo quantification of biological iron is possible by reconstructing magnetic susceptibility maps obtained using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Applying QSM is challenging, as up to now, no standardization of acquisition protocols and phase image processing has emerged from referenced studies. Our objectives were to compare the accuracy and the sensitivity of 10 QSM pipelines built from algorithms from the literature, applied on phantoms data and on brain data. Two phantoms, with known magnetic susceptibility ranges, were created from several solutions of gadolinium chelate. Twenty healthy volunteers from two age groups were included. Phantoms and brain data were acquired at 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. Susceptibility-weighted images were obtained using a 3D multigradient-recalled-echo sequence. For brain data, 3D anatomical T1- and T2-weighted images were also acquired to segment the deep gray nuclei of interest. Concerning in vitro data, the linear dependence of magnetic susceptibility versus gadolinium concentration and deviations from the theoretically expected values were calculated. For brain data, the accuracy and sensitivity of the QSM pipelines were evaluated in comparison with results from the literature and regarding the expected magnetic susceptibility increase with age, respectively. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the magnetic susceptibility quantification in deep gray nuclei between the two age groups. Our methodology enabled quantifying magnetic susceptibility in human brain and the results were consistent with those from the literature. Statistically significant differences were obtained between the two age groups in all cerebral regions of interest. Our results show the importance of optimizing QSM pipelines according to the application and the targeted magnetic susceptibility range, to achieve accurate quantification. We were able to define the optimal QSM pipeline for future applications on patients with PD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信