为什么犀鸟没有过河?高地栖息地而非物理障碍限制了褐犀鸟的分布

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ramamoorthi Chaitanya, Rohit Naniwadekar, Shai Meiri
{"title":"为什么犀鸟没有过河?高地栖息地而非物理障碍限制了褐犀鸟的分布","authors":"Ramamoorthi Chaitanya,&nbsp;Rohit Naniwadekar,&nbsp;Shai Meiri","doi":"10.1111/jbi.14979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>In continuous environments, niche limits of species often determine their distribution limits. However, when these limits spatially coincide with a perceived dispersal barrier, the determinants of species' ranges may be confounded. We investigate the distribution pattern of the Brown Hornbill (Aves: Bucerotidae), which spans significant riverine barriers, but stops south of the Brahmaputra River. Considering its preference for low-elevation evergreen forests, we posit that the lack of sufficient habitats north of the Brahmaputra prevents dispersal of the Brown Hornbill, and not the river itself.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The Brahmaputra valley and the Indo-Burma hotspot.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxa</h3>\n \n <p><i>Anorrhinus austeni</i>, <i>Aceros nipalensis.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed citizen-science occurrence data on hornbill presence against a suite of climatic, canopy-specific and topographical predictors to model the environmental niche of the Brown Hornbill. We used presence-only maximum entropy modelling in an information theoretic framework, in conjunction with constructing binary logistic regression models using presence and pseudoabsence data. We compared niche models of the Brown Hornbill and the Rufous-necked hornbill, a close relative with a similar distribution, but which has spanned the Brahmaputra River.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the presence of suitable wet-evergreen forests north of the Brahmaputra River, the hilly terrains in the region act as a biogeographic barrier for the Brown Hornbill, which prefers lowland evergreen forests. Further, highly suitable regions for the Brown and the Rufous-necked Hornbills precisely delineate low and high-elevation evergreen forests respectively, indicating that these birds are separated along an elevational axis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Brahmaputra River lies at the cusp of two subtly different environmental regimes. It may therefore serve as the niche limit for certain organisms and not as a physical obstacle to their dispersal. Our study implicitly predicts how widespread deforestation prevalent in the lowland evergreen forests of this region adversely impacts the distributions of organisms that depend on them, such as the Brown Hornbill. Further, our study proffers an approach to ascertain determinants of species distributions in a hypothesis testing framework.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbi.14979","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why did the Hornbill not cross the river? Upland habitats rather than a physical barrier limit the distribution of the Brown Hornbill\",\"authors\":\"Ramamoorthi Chaitanya,&nbsp;Rohit Naniwadekar,&nbsp;Shai Meiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.14979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>In continuous environments, niche limits of species often determine their distribution limits. However, when these limits spatially coincide with a perceived dispersal barrier, the determinants of species' ranges may be confounded. We investigate the distribution pattern of the Brown Hornbill (Aves: Bucerotidae), which spans significant riverine barriers, but stops south of the Brahmaputra River. Considering its preference for low-elevation evergreen forests, we posit that the lack of sufficient habitats north of the Brahmaputra prevents dispersal of the Brown Hornbill, and not the river itself.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Brahmaputra valley and the Indo-Burma hotspot.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxa</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>Anorrhinus austeni</i>, <i>Aceros nipalensis.</i></p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analysed citizen-science occurrence data on hornbill presence against a suite of climatic, canopy-specific and topographical predictors to model the environmental niche of the Brown Hornbill. We used presence-only maximum entropy modelling in an information theoretic framework, in conjunction with constructing binary logistic regression models using presence and pseudoabsence data. We compared niche models of the Brown Hornbill and the Rufous-necked hornbill, a close relative with a similar distribution, but which has spanned the Brahmaputra River.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the presence of suitable wet-evergreen forests north of the Brahmaputra River, the hilly terrains in the region act as a biogeographic barrier for the Brown Hornbill, which prefers lowland evergreen forests. Further, highly suitable regions for the Brown and the Rufous-necked Hornbills precisely delineate low and high-elevation evergreen forests respectively, indicating that these birds are separated along an elevational axis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Brahmaputra River lies at the cusp of two subtly different environmental regimes. It may therefore serve as the niche limit for certain organisms and not as a physical obstacle to their dispersal. Our study implicitly predicts how widespread deforestation prevalent in the lowland evergreen forests of this region adversely impacts the distributions of organisms that depend on them, such as the Brown Hornbill. Further, our study proffers an approach to ascertain determinants of species distributions in a hypothesis testing framework.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbi.14979\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.14979\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.14979","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在连续环境中,物种的生态位极限往往决定了它们的分布范围。然而,当这些界限在空间上与可感知的扩散障碍重合时,物种分布范围的决定因素可能会被混淆。我们研究了褐犀鸟(鸟类:Bucerotidae)的分布模式,它跨越了重要的河流障碍,但在雅鲁藏布江以南停止了分布。考虑到褐犀鸟对低海拔常绿林的偏好,我们认为是雅鲁藏布江以北缺乏足够的栖息地阻碍了褐犀鸟的扩散,而不是雅鲁藏布江本身。方法我们根据一系列气候、树冠特异性和地形预测因子分析了关于犀鸟出现情况的公民科学出现数据,以建立褐犀鸟的环境生态位模型。我们在信息论框架下使用了仅存在的最大熵模型,并利用存在和伪存在数据构建了二元逻辑回归模型。我们比较了褐犀鸟和红颈犀鸟的生态位模型,红颈犀鸟是褐犀鸟的近亲,分布范围相似,但已跨越雅鲁藏布江。结果尽管雅鲁藏布江以北有适宜的常绿湿林,但该地区的丘陵地形成为褐犀鸟的生物地理屏障,因为褐犀鸟更喜欢低地常绿林。此外,褐犀鸟和红颈犀鸟的高度适宜区分别精确地划分为低海拔常绿林和高海拔常绿林,这表明这些鸟类是沿着海拔轴线分开的。因此,雅鲁藏布江可能是某些生物的生态位极限,而不是其扩散的物理障碍。我们的研究隐含地预测了该地区低地常绿林中普遍存在的森林砍伐如何对依赖森林的生物(如褐犀鸟)的分布产生不利影响。此外,我们的研究还提出了一种在假设检验框架下确定物种分布决定因素的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Why did the Hornbill not cross the river? Upland habitats rather than a physical barrier limit the distribution of the Brown Hornbill

Why did the Hornbill not cross the river? Upland habitats rather than a physical barrier limit the distribution of the Brown Hornbill

Aim

In continuous environments, niche limits of species often determine their distribution limits. However, when these limits spatially coincide with a perceived dispersal barrier, the determinants of species' ranges may be confounded. We investigate the distribution pattern of the Brown Hornbill (Aves: Bucerotidae), which spans significant riverine barriers, but stops south of the Brahmaputra River. Considering its preference for low-elevation evergreen forests, we posit that the lack of sufficient habitats north of the Brahmaputra prevents dispersal of the Brown Hornbill, and not the river itself.

Location

The Brahmaputra valley and the Indo-Burma hotspot.

Taxa

Anorrhinus austeni, Aceros nipalensis.

Methods

We analysed citizen-science occurrence data on hornbill presence against a suite of climatic, canopy-specific and topographical predictors to model the environmental niche of the Brown Hornbill. We used presence-only maximum entropy modelling in an information theoretic framework, in conjunction with constructing binary logistic regression models using presence and pseudoabsence data. We compared niche models of the Brown Hornbill and the Rufous-necked hornbill, a close relative with a similar distribution, but which has spanned the Brahmaputra River.

Results

Despite the presence of suitable wet-evergreen forests north of the Brahmaputra River, the hilly terrains in the region act as a biogeographic barrier for the Brown Hornbill, which prefers lowland evergreen forests. Further, highly suitable regions for the Brown and the Rufous-necked Hornbills precisely delineate low and high-elevation evergreen forests respectively, indicating that these birds are separated along an elevational axis.

Main Conclusions

The Brahmaputra River lies at the cusp of two subtly different environmental regimes. It may therefore serve as the niche limit for certain organisms and not as a physical obstacle to their dispersal. Our study implicitly predicts how widespread deforestation prevalent in the lowland evergreen forests of this region adversely impacts the distributions of organisms that depend on them, such as the Brown Hornbill. Further, our study proffers an approach to ascertain determinants of species distributions in a hypothesis testing framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信