评估车载光伏应用中两种稳态温度模型的准确性

IF 8 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Neel Patel, Bart E. Pieters, Karsten Bittkau, Evgenii Sovetkin, Kaining Ding, Angèle Reinders
{"title":"评估车载光伏应用中两种稳态温度模型的准确性","authors":"Neel Patel,&nbsp;Bart E. Pieters,&nbsp;Karsten Bittkau,&nbsp;Evgenii Sovetkin,&nbsp;Kaining Ding,&nbsp;Angèle Reinders","doi":"10.1002/pip.3832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We assess the accuracy of two steady-state temperature models, namely, Ross and Faiman, in the context of photovoltaics (PV) systems integrated in vehicles. Therefore, we present an analysis of irradiance and temperature data monitored on a PV system on top of a vehicle. Next, we have modeled PV cell temperatures in this PV system, representing onboard vehicle PV systems using the Ross and Faiman model. These models could predict temperatures with a coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) in the range of 0.61–0.88 for the Ross model and 0.63–0.93 for the Faiman model. It was observed that the Ross and Faiman model have high errors when instantaneous data are used but become more accurate when averaged to timesteps of greater than 1000–1500 s. The Faiman model's instantaneous response was independent of the variations in the weather conditions, especially wind speed, due to a lack of thermal capacitance term in the model. This study found that the power and energy yield calculations were minimally affected by the errors in temperature predictions. However, a transient model, which includes the thermal mass of the vehicle and PV modules, is necessary for an accurate instantaneous temperature prediction of PV modules in vehicle-integrated (VIPV) applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":223,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Photovoltaics","volume":"32 11","pages":"790-798"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pip.3832","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the accuracy of two steady-state temperature models for onboard passenger vehicle photovoltaics applications\",\"authors\":\"Neel Patel,&nbsp;Bart E. Pieters,&nbsp;Karsten Bittkau,&nbsp;Evgenii Sovetkin,&nbsp;Kaining Ding,&nbsp;Angèle Reinders\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pip.3832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We assess the accuracy of two steady-state temperature models, namely, Ross and Faiman, in the context of photovoltaics (PV) systems integrated in vehicles. Therefore, we present an analysis of irradiance and temperature data monitored on a PV system on top of a vehicle. Next, we have modeled PV cell temperatures in this PV system, representing onboard vehicle PV systems using the Ross and Faiman model. These models could predict temperatures with a coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) in the range of 0.61–0.88 for the Ross model and 0.63–0.93 for the Faiman model. It was observed that the Ross and Faiman model have high errors when instantaneous data are used but become more accurate when averaged to timesteps of greater than 1000–1500 s. The Faiman model's instantaneous response was independent of the variations in the weather conditions, especially wind speed, due to a lack of thermal capacitance term in the model. This study found that the power and energy yield calculations were minimally affected by the errors in temperature predictions. However, a transient model, which includes the thermal mass of the vehicle and PV modules, is necessary for an accurate instantaneous temperature prediction of PV modules in vehicle-integrated (VIPV) applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Photovoltaics\",\"volume\":\"32 11\",\"pages\":\"790-798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pip.3832\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Photovoltaics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.3832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.3832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们以集成在车辆中的光伏(PV)系统为背景,评估了两种稳态温度模型(即罗斯模型和费曼模型)的准确性。因此,我们对车辆顶部光伏系统监测到的辐照度和温度数据进行了分析。接下来,我们使用罗斯和费曼模型对该光伏系统中的光伏电池温度进行了建模,该模型代表了车载光伏系统。这些模型可以预测温度,罗斯模型的判定系数 (R2) 在 0.61-0.88 之间,费曼模型的判定系数 (R2) 在 0.63-0.93 之间。据观察,在使用瞬时数据时,Ross 和 Faiman 模型的误差较大,但当平均时间步长大于 1000-1500 秒时,误差就会变得更加精确。Faiman 模型的瞬时响应与天气条件的变化无关,尤其是风速,这是因为模型中缺少热电容项。这项研究发现,功率和能量产出计算受温度预测误差的影响很小。不过,要准确预测车载一体化(VIPV)应用中光伏模块的瞬时温度,必须建立一个包含车辆和光伏模块热质量的瞬态模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the accuracy of two steady-state temperature models for onboard passenger vehicle photovoltaics applications

Assessing the accuracy of two steady-state temperature models for onboard passenger vehicle photovoltaics applications

We assess the accuracy of two steady-state temperature models, namely, Ross and Faiman, in the context of photovoltaics (PV) systems integrated in vehicles. Therefore, we present an analysis of irradiance and temperature data monitored on a PV system on top of a vehicle. Next, we have modeled PV cell temperatures in this PV system, representing onboard vehicle PV systems using the Ross and Faiman model. These models could predict temperatures with a coefficient of determination (R2) in the range of 0.61–0.88 for the Ross model and 0.63–0.93 for the Faiman model. It was observed that the Ross and Faiman model have high errors when instantaneous data are used but become more accurate when averaged to timesteps of greater than 1000–1500 s. The Faiman model's instantaneous response was independent of the variations in the weather conditions, especially wind speed, due to a lack of thermal capacitance term in the model. This study found that the power and energy yield calculations were minimally affected by the errors in temperature predictions. However, a transient model, which includes the thermal mass of the vehicle and PV modules, is necessary for an accurate instantaneous temperature prediction of PV modules in vehicle-integrated (VIPV) applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Photovoltaics
Progress in Photovoltaics 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
130
审稿时长
5.4 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Photovoltaics offers a prestigious forum for reporting advances in this rapidly developing technology, aiming to reach all interested professionals, researchers and energy policy-makers. The key criterion is that all papers submitted should report substantial “progress” in photovoltaics. Papers are encouraged that report substantial “progress” such as gains in independently certified solar cell efficiency, eligible for a new entry in the journal''s widely referenced Solar Cell Efficiency Tables. Examples of papers that will not be considered for publication are those that report development in materials without relation to data on cell performance, routine analysis, characterisation or modelling of cells or processing sequences, routine reports of system performance, improvements in electronic hardware design, or country programs, although invited papers may occasionally be solicited in these areas to capture accumulated “progress”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信