用注重价值的思维制定保护目标

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
David M. Martin, Joshua H. Goldstein, David R. Smith, G. A. Pabodha Galgamuwa, Aileen Craig, Michelle Dietz, Caitlin Kerr
{"title":"用注重价值的思维制定保护目标","authors":"David M. Martin,&nbsp;Joshua H. Goldstein,&nbsp;David R. Smith,&nbsp;G. A. Pabodha Galgamuwa,&nbsp;Aileen Craig,&nbsp;Michelle Dietz,&nbsp;Caitlin Kerr","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The approach common to well-known conservation planning frameworks is rooted in values, like species persistence and quality habitat, and expectations resulting from conservation actions, like restoration and protection. We evaluated value-focused thinking (VFT) as a framework for setting objectives based on personal or group values. Our approach included five steps: eliciting individual participant values, specifying objectives, organizing objectives, structuring multiple objectives, and a quality check. We implemented these steps with 12 conservation planning teams at a global conservation organization. We performed descriptive analyses based on comparisons between final group objectives and initial individual objectives as well as the quality check. We found that participants could only self-identify a proportion of the team's objectives, which VFT strengthened. Participants were equally challenged with identifying means and ends objectives, contrasting with general VFT theory. Both experienced and newly formed teams effectively applied VFT. Our study formalizes a common-sense approach to evaluating the underlying drivers of conservation planning so that its resulting outcomes can be most impactful.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting conservation objectives with value-focused thinking\",\"authors\":\"David M. Martin,&nbsp;Joshua H. Goldstein,&nbsp;David R. Smith,&nbsp;G. A. Pabodha Galgamuwa,&nbsp;Aileen Craig,&nbsp;Michelle Dietz,&nbsp;Caitlin Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.13155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The approach common to well-known conservation planning frameworks is rooted in values, like species persistence and quality habitat, and expectations resulting from conservation actions, like restoration and protection. We evaluated value-focused thinking (VFT) as a framework for setting objectives based on personal or group values. Our approach included five steps: eliciting individual participant values, specifying objectives, organizing objectives, structuring multiple objectives, and a quality check. We implemented these steps with 12 conservation planning teams at a global conservation organization. We performed descriptive analyses based on comparisons between final group objectives and initial individual objectives as well as the quality check. We found that participants could only self-identify a proportion of the team's objectives, which VFT strengthened. Participants were equally challenged with identifying means and ends objectives, contrasting with general VFT theory. Both experienced and newly formed teams effectively applied VFT. Our study formalizes a common-sense approach to evaluating the underlying drivers of conservation planning so that its resulting outcomes can be most impactful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13155\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知的保护规划框架所采用的方法都植根于价值观,如物种的持久性和优质栖息地,以及对保护行动的期望,如恢复和保护。我们对以价值为中心的思维(VFT)进行了评估,将其作为根据个人或团体价值设定目标的框架。我们的方法包括五个步骤:激发参与者的个人价值观、明确目标、组织目标、构建多个目标以及质量检查。我们在一个全球性保护组织的 12 个保护规划团队中实施了这些步骤。我们根据最终小组目标与最初个人目标以及质量检查之间的比较进行了描述性分析。我们发现,参与者只能自我确定团队目标的一部分,而 VFT 强化了这一部分。参与者在确定手段和目的目标方面同样面临挑战,这与一般的 VFT 理论形成了鲜明对比。经验丰富的团队和新组建的团队都有效地应用了 VFT。我们的研究正式确定了一种常识性方法,用于评估保护规划的基本驱动因素,从而使其产生的结果最具影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Setting conservation objectives with value-focused thinking

Setting conservation objectives with value-focused thinking

The approach common to well-known conservation planning frameworks is rooted in values, like species persistence and quality habitat, and expectations resulting from conservation actions, like restoration and protection. We evaluated value-focused thinking (VFT) as a framework for setting objectives based on personal or group values. Our approach included five steps: eliciting individual participant values, specifying objectives, organizing objectives, structuring multiple objectives, and a quality check. We implemented these steps with 12 conservation planning teams at a global conservation organization. We performed descriptive analyses based on comparisons between final group objectives and initial individual objectives as well as the quality check. We found that participants could only self-identify a proportion of the team's objectives, which VFT strengthened. Participants were equally challenged with identifying means and ends objectives, contrasting with general VFT theory. Both experienced and newly formed teams effectively applied VFT. Our study formalizes a common-sense approach to evaluating the underlying drivers of conservation planning so that its resulting outcomes can be most impactful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信