{"title":"研磨和各向异性环境:对第 15 组烯丙基络合物非对映选择性形成的影响†。","authors":"Lauren E. Wenger and Timothy P. Hanusa","doi":"10.1039/D4MR00001C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The heavy Group 15 allyls <img> (E = As, Sb, Bi; [A′] = [1,3-(SiMe<small><sub>3</sub></small>)<small><sub>2</sub></small>C<small><sub>3</sub></small>H<small><sub>3</sub></small>]<small><sup>−</sup></small>) can be prepared either in solution or mechanochemically, and exist in two diastereomeric forms of C<small><sub>1</sub></small> and C<small><sub>3</sub></small> symmetry. For E = As and Sb, their ratio varies with the method of preparation: the C<small><sub>1</sub></small> diastereomer is the major form by both methods, but the mechanochemical route increases the C<small><sub>1</sub></small> : C<small><sub>3</sub></small> ratio compared to synthesis in hexanes solution. The difference in selectivity has previously been identified as a consequence of the layered crystal lattices of the EX<small><sub>3</sub></small> reagents, which provide a templating effect through an anisotropic grinding environment. How this selectivity changes with other typical mechanochemical variables is explored here, including the use of different reagents and LAG solvents, pre-grinding the reagents, the use of different milling media (stainless steel, Teflon, <em>etc.</em>) and apparatus (mixer mill, planetary mill), and the number and size of balls. The extent to which the anisotropic environment is either maintained or modified during synthesis (especially by LAG and the choice of metal reagent) affects the diastereomeric ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":101140,"journal":{"name":"RSC Mechanochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/mr/d4mr00001c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grinding and the anisotropic environment: influences on the diastereoselective formation of Group 15 allyl complexes†\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Wenger and Timothy P. Hanusa\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4MR00001C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The heavy Group 15 allyls <img> (E = As, Sb, Bi; [A′] = [1,3-(SiMe<small><sub>3</sub></small>)<small><sub>2</sub></small>C<small><sub>3</sub></small>H<small><sub>3</sub></small>]<small><sup>−</sup></small>) can be prepared either in solution or mechanochemically, and exist in two diastereomeric forms of C<small><sub>1</sub></small> and C<small><sub>3</sub></small> symmetry. For E = As and Sb, their ratio varies with the method of preparation: the C<small><sub>1</sub></small> diastereomer is the major form by both methods, but the mechanochemical route increases the C<small><sub>1</sub></small> : C<small><sub>3</sub></small> ratio compared to synthesis in hexanes solution. The difference in selectivity has previously been identified as a consequence of the layered crystal lattices of the EX<small><sub>3</sub></small> reagents, which provide a templating effect through an anisotropic grinding environment. How this selectivity changes with other typical mechanochemical variables is explored here, including the use of different reagents and LAG solvents, pre-grinding the reagents, the use of different milling media (stainless steel, Teflon, <em>etc.</em>) and apparatus (mixer mill, planetary mill), and the number and size of balls. The extent to which the anisotropic environment is either maintained or modified during synthesis (especially by LAG and the choice of metal reagent) affects the diastereomeric ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSC Mechanochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/mr/d4mr00001c?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSC Mechanochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/mr/d4mr00001c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Mechanochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/mr/d4mr00001c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
第 15 组重金属烯丙基(E = As、Sb、Bi;[A′] = [1,3-(SiMe3)2C3H3]-)既可以在溶液中制备,也可以通过机械化学方法制备,存在 C1 和 C3 两种非对映对称形式。对于 E = As 和 Sb,它们的比例随制备方法的不同而变化:两种方法都以 C1 非对映异构体为主要形式,但与在溶液中合成相比,机械化学方法提高了 C1 :C3 的比例。选择性的差异以前被认为是 EX3 试剂的层状晶格造成的,这种晶格通过各向异性的研磨环境提供了模板效应。本文探讨了这种选择性如何随其他典型的机械化学变量而变化,包括使用不同的试剂和 LAG 溶剂、试剂的预研磨、使用不同的研磨介质(不锈钢、聚四氟乙烯等)和设备(混合磨、行星磨)以及球的数量和大小。合成过程中各向异性环境的维持或改变程度(尤其是 LAG 和金属试剂的选择)会影响非对映异构体的比例。
Grinding and the anisotropic environment: influences on the diastereoselective formation of Group 15 allyl complexes†
The heavy Group 15 allyls (E = As, Sb, Bi; [A′] = [1,3-(SiMe3)2C3H3]−) can be prepared either in solution or mechanochemically, and exist in two diastereomeric forms of C1 and C3 symmetry. For E = As and Sb, their ratio varies with the method of preparation: the C1 diastereomer is the major form by both methods, but the mechanochemical route increases the C1 : C3 ratio compared to synthesis in hexanes solution. The difference in selectivity has previously been identified as a consequence of the layered crystal lattices of the EX3 reagents, which provide a templating effect through an anisotropic grinding environment. How this selectivity changes with other typical mechanochemical variables is explored here, including the use of different reagents and LAG solvents, pre-grinding the reagents, the use of different milling media (stainless steel, Teflon, etc.) and apparatus (mixer mill, planetary mill), and the number and size of balls. The extent to which the anisotropic environment is either maintained or modified during synthesis (especially by LAG and the choice of metal reagent) affects the diastereomeric ratio.