关于癌症治疗误导的医患沟通:错误信息应对模式

M. Devyn Mullis , Carla L. Fisher , Skyler B. Johnson , Tianshi Liu , Tithi B. Amin , Sherise Rogers , Kennan DeGruccio , Carma L. Bylund
{"title":"关于癌症治疗误导的医患沟通:错误信息应对模式","authors":"M. Devyn Mullis ,&nbsp;Carla L. Fisher ,&nbsp;Skyler B. Johnson ,&nbsp;Tianshi Liu ,&nbsp;Tithi B. Amin ,&nbsp;Sherise Rogers ,&nbsp;Kennan DeGruccio ,&nbsp;Carma L. Bylund","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Cancer treatment misinformation (CTM) is pervasive and impacts patient health outcomes. Cancer clinicians play an essential role in addressing CTM. We previously identified four self-reported responses that characterize the communication process clinicians engage in to address CTM. Clinicians 1) work to understand the misinformation; 2) correct the misinformation through education; 3) advise about future online searches; and 4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. We sought to confirm and expand on the model we developed by observing cancer clinicians' communication while addressing CTM with a standardized patient (SP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>17 cancer clinicians were audio recorded in a SP encounter, in which a breast cancer SP asked three questions based on CTM. We thematically analyzed transcriptions of the recordings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinicians used four responses with associated strategies and skills to address CTM in a standardized clinical encounter, confirming the previously developed model. The four responses were: (1) work to understand the misinformation; (2) correct the misinformation through education; (3) advise about future online searches; and (4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. This observational approach allowed us to refine strategies within each response and identify communication skills clinicians enact to address CTM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings provide a strong foundation for the Misinformation Response Model for cancer clinicians. Future research should examine which components of the model are most effective in improving patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>This is the first study observing clinicians' communication through simulated practice with SPs about CTM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000670/pdfft?md5=796a7c80f3fe3f183dd7f66a01540384&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000670-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician-patient communication about cancer treatment misinformation: The Misinformation Response Model\",\"authors\":\"M. Devyn Mullis ,&nbsp;Carla L. Fisher ,&nbsp;Skyler B. Johnson ,&nbsp;Tianshi Liu ,&nbsp;Tithi B. Amin ,&nbsp;Sherise Rogers ,&nbsp;Kennan DeGruccio ,&nbsp;Carma L. Bylund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Cancer treatment misinformation (CTM) is pervasive and impacts patient health outcomes. Cancer clinicians play an essential role in addressing CTM. We previously identified four self-reported responses that characterize the communication process clinicians engage in to address CTM. Clinicians 1) work to understand the misinformation; 2) correct the misinformation through education; 3) advise about future online searches; and 4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. We sought to confirm and expand on the model we developed by observing cancer clinicians' communication while addressing CTM with a standardized patient (SP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>17 cancer clinicians were audio recorded in a SP encounter, in which a breast cancer SP asked three questions based on CTM. We thematically analyzed transcriptions of the recordings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinicians used four responses with associated strategies and skills to address CTM in a standardized clinical encounter, confirming the previously developed model. The four responses were: (1) work to understand the misinformation; (2) correct the misinformation through education; (3) advise about future online searches; and (4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. This observational approach allowed us to refine strategies within each response and identify communication skills clinicians enact to address CTM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings provide a strong foundation for the Misinformation Response Model for cancer clinicians. Future research should examine which components of the model are most effective in improving patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>This is the first study observing clinicians' communication through simulated practice with SPs about CTM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000670/pdfft?md5=796a7c80f3fe3f183dd7f66a01540384&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000670-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标癌症治疗误导信息(CTM)普遍存在并影响患者的健康结果。癌症临床医生在应对 CTM 方面发挥着至关重要的作用。我们先前确定了临床医生为解决 CTM 而参与的沟通过程中的四种自我报告反应。临床医生:1)努力了解错误信息;2)通过教育纠正错误信息;3)就未来的在线搜索提供建议;以及 4)维护临床医生与患者之间的关系。我们试图通过观察癌症临床医生在与标准化患者(SP)讨论 CTM 时的交流情况来证实并扩展我们开发的模型。方法:我们对 17 名癌症临床医生在 SP 会诊中的谈话进行了录音,其中一名乳腺癌 SP 根据 CTM 提出了三个问题。我们对录音转录进行了专题分析。结果临床医生在标准化临床会诊中使用了四种反应及相关策略和技巧来应对 CTM,证实了之前开发的模型。这四种应对方法是(1) 努力了解错误信息;(2) 通过教育纠正错误信息;(3) 就未来的在线搜索提供建议;(4) 维护临床医生与患者之间的关系。这些发现为癌症临床医生的错误信息应对模式奠定了坚实的基础。未来的研究应探讨该模型的哪些部分对改善患者预后最有效。创新这是第一项通过模拟实践观察临床医生与 SPs 就 CTM 进行沟通的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician-patient communication about cancer treatment misinformation: The Misinformation Response Model

Objective

Cancer treatment misinformation (CTM) is pervasive and impacts patient health outcomes. Cancer clinicians play an essential role in addressing CTM. We previously identified four self-reported responses that characterize the communication process clinicians engage in to address CTM. Clinicians 1) work to understand the misinformation; 2) correct the misinformation through education; 3) advise about future online searches; and 4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. We sought to confirm and expand on the model we developed by observing cancer clinicians' communication while addressing CTM with a standardized patient (SP).

Methods

17 cancer clinicians were audio recorded in a SP encounter, in which a breast cancer SP asked three questions based on CTM. We thematically analyzed transcriptions of the recordings.

Results

Clinicians used four responses with associated strategies and skills to address CTM in a standardized clinical encounter, confirming the previously developed model. The four responses were: (1) work to understand the misinformation; (2) correct the misinformation through education; (3) advise about future online searches; and (4) preserve the clinician-patient relationship. This observational approach allowed us to refine strategies within each response and identify communication skills clinicians enact to address CTM.

Conclusion

These findings provide a strong foundation for the Misinformation Response Model for cancer clinicians. Future research should examine which components of the model are most effective in improving patient outcomes.

Innovation

This is the first study observing clinicians' communication through simulated practice with SPs about CTM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信